Advertisement

Axonal Delay Controller for Spiking Neural Networks Based on FPGA

  • Mireya ZapataEmail author
  • Jordi MadrenasEmail author
  • Miroslava ZapataEmail author
  • Jorge AlvarezEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 965)

Abstract

In this paper, the implementation of a programmable Axonal Delay Controller (ADyC) mapped on a hardware Neural Processor (NP) FPGA-based is reported. It is possible to define axonal delays between 1 to 31 emulation cycles to global and local pre-synaptic spikes generated by NP, extending the temporal characteristics supported by this architecture. The prototype presented in this work contributes to the realism of the network, which mimics the temporal biological characteristics of spike propagation through the cortex. The contribution of temporal information is strongly related to the learning process. ADyC operation is transparent for the rest of the system and neither affects the remaining tasks executed by the NP nor the emulation time period. In addition, an example implemented on hardware of a neural oscillator with programmable delays configured for a set of neurons is presented in order to demonstrate full platform functionality and operability.

Keywords

Axonal delay FPGA Spiking Neural Networks 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and the European Social Fund (ESF) under Projects TEC2011-27047 and TEC2015-67278-R. Mireya Zapata held a scholarship from National Secretary of High Education, Science, Technology, and Innovation (SENESCYT) of the Ecuadorian government.

References

  1. 1.
    Ghosh-Dastidar, S., Adeli, H.: Third generation neural networks: spiking neural networks. In: Advances in Computational Intelligence, pp. 167–178. Springer, Berlin (2009). ISBN: 978-3-642-03156-4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03156-4_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brunel, N.: Dynamics of sparsely connected networks of excitatory and inhibitory spiking neurons. J. Comput. Neurosci. 8(3), 183–208 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roxin, A., Brunel, N., Hansel, D.: Role of delays in shaping spatiotemporal dynamics of neuronal activity in large networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(23), 238103 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Izhikevich, E.M., Gally, J.A., Edelman, G.M.: Spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Cereb Cortex 14(8), 933–944 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bringuier, V., Chavane, F., et al.: Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. Science 283, 695–699 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scholze, S., et al.: VLSI implementation of a 2.8 Gevent/s packet-based AER interface with routing and event sorting functionality. Front. Neurosci. 5, 1–13 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00117
  7. 7.
    Wang, R.M., et al.: A mixed-signal implementation of a polychronous spiking neural network with delay adaptation. Front. Neurosci. 1–16 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00051
  8. 8.
    Sripad, A., et al.: SNAVA—a real-time multi-FPGA multi-model spiking neural network simulation architecture. Neural Netw. 97, 28–45 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2017.09.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zapata, M., Madrenas, J.: Synfire chain emulation by means of flexible SNN modeling on a SIMD multicore architecture. In: 25th International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks ICANN 2016, vol. 8681, pp. 222–229, September 2016. ISSN: 16113349.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11179-7Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Madrenas, J., Moreno, J.M.: Strategies in SIMD computing for complex neural bioinspired applications. In: Proceedings of 2009 NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems, AHS, pp. 376–381 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ahs.2009.31
  11. 11.
    Dorta, T., Zapata, M., Madrenas, J., et al.: AER-SRT: scalable spike distribution by means of synchronous serial ring topology address event representation. Neurocomputing 171, 1684–1690 (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.07.080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Izhikevich, E.M.: Which model to use for cortical spiking neurons? IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 15(5), 1063–1070 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Zapata, M., Jadán, J., Madrenas, J.: Efficient configuration for a scalable spiking neural network platform by means of a synchronous address event representation bus. In: 2018 NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptative Hardware and System, pp. 241–248 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/AHS.2018.8541463
  16. 16.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics EngineeringUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Research Center of Mechatronics and Interactive SystemsUniversidad Tecnológica IndoaméricaQuitoEcuador
  3. 3.Department of Electronics EngineeringUniversity of the Armed Forces ESPESangolquíEcuador

Personalised recommendations