Advertisement

Gender and Class Tensions in Hungarian LGBTQ Activism: The Case of Ambiguous Bisexual Representation

  • Ráhel Katalin Turai
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines how bisexuality is represented in contemporary Hungary and what it implies for the local LGBTQ movement specifically. I argue that the images of bisexuality which Hungarian mainstream sexist-heteronormative media, dating sites, and LGBTQ activism create and reproduce, reveal the sexist and classist elements of identity politics pursued by the Hungarian LGBTQ movement. Analysis of these discourses shows how bisexual representations build on women’s sexual objectification and the classed opportunities of coming out. Trapped between homophobic nation states and identity politics driven by Western donors, Hungarian LGBTQ activism lacks both the resources and the necessary critical perspective to address and represent a wide range of people with non-heterosexual practices. This results in a widening, gendered and classed, split between various non-heterosexual lifestyles.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am greatly indebted to the two volume editors Radzhana Buyantueva and Maryna Shevtsova, as well as to Adriana Qubaiova, Amy Soto and Anna Szlávi for helping me edit this chapter. Any mistakes that remain are my own.

References

  1. Ayoub, P. M., & Paternotte, D. (2014). Introduction. In P. M. Ayoub & D. Paternotte (Eds.), Gender and Politics: LGBT Activism and the Making of Europe: A Rainbow Europe? (pp. 1–25). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Baer, B. J. (2005). The New Visibility: Representing Sexual Minorities in the Popular Culture in Post-Soviet Russia. In A. Štulhofer & T. Sandfort (Eds.), Sexuality and Gender in Postcommunist Eastern Europe and Russia (pp. 193–205). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bilić, B. (2016). Europeanization, LGBT Activism, and Non-heteronormativity in the Post-Yugoslav Space: An Introduction. In B. Bilić (Ed.), LGBT Activism and Europeanisation in the Post-Yugoslav Space (pp. 1–22). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borgos, A. (2007). The Boundaries of Identity: Bisexuality in Everyday and Theoretical Contexts. In R. Kuhar & J. Takács (Eds.), Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe (pp. 169–183). Ljubljana: Mirovni Institut.Google Scholar
  5. Borgos, A. (2014). Eltitkolt évek – mozaikok a magyar leszbikus herstoryból [Secret Years—Mosaics from Hungarian Lesbian Herstory]. Replika, 85–86, 123–146.Google Scholar
  6. Böröcz, J. (2006). Goodness Is Elsewhere: The Rule of European Difference. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 48(1), 110–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bunzl, M. (2000). The Prague Experience: Gay Male Sex Tourism and the Neo-Colonial Invention of an Embodied Border. In D. Berdahl, M. Bunzl, & M. Lampland (Eds.), Ethnographies of Transition in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union (pp. 70–95). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  8. Butterfield, N. (2016). Discontents of Professionalisation: Sexual Politics and Activism in Croatia in the Context of EU Accession. In B. Bilić (Ed.), LGBT Activism and Europeanisation in the Post-Yugoslav Space (pp. 23–58). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisner, S. (2013). Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution. Berkeley: Seal Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fahs, B. (2009). Compulsory Bisexuality? The Challenges of Modern Sexual Fluidity. Journal of Bisexuality, 9(3), 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fahs, B., Plante, R. F., & McClelland, S. I. (2018). Working at the Crossroads of Pleasure and Danger: Feminist Perspectives on Doing Critical Sexuality Studies. Sexualities, 21(4), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser, N. (1995). From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a ‘Post-Socialist’ Age. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.Google Scholar
  13. Gagyi, Á. (2012). Anti-populism as an Element of Postsocialism. Paper presented at the 44th Annual Convention of the Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  14. Garber, M. (1996). Vice Versa: Bisexuality and the Eroticism of Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Hemmings, C. (2002). Bisexual Spaces. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hoy, J. L. (2007). Secret Sex and the Down Low Brotherhood. In S. Seidman, N. Fischer, & C. Meeks (Eds.), Introducing the New Sexuality Studies: Original Essays and Interviews (pp. 209–302). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hura, R. (2016). Against Bisexual Erasure: The Beginnings of Bi Activism in Serbia. In B. Bilić & S. Kajinić (Eds.), Intersectionality and LGBT Activist Politics: Multiple Others in Croatia and Serbia (pp. 55–76). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Imre, A. (2009). Identity Games: Globalization and the Transformation of Media Cultures in the New Europe. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kašić, B. (2005). The Spatiality of Identities and Sexualities: Is ‘Transition’ a Challenging Point at All? In A. Štulhofer & T. Sandfort (Eds.), Sexuality and Gender in Postcommunist Eastern Europe and Russia (pp. 95–108). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kis, K. (2012). Identity Politics, Authenticity and Romantic Love: American Telecinematic Discourses on Homosexuality and the Hungarian ‘Gay Boom’ of the 2000’s [Thematic issue: ‘In Transition?’ Central/Eastern European Sexualities]. lambda nordica, 17(4), 153–185.Google Scholar
  21. Mészáros, G. (2017). Reconsidering the Identity Approach of the EU LGBT+ Architecture from a Feminist Perspective. In E. Kováts (Ed.), The Future of the European Union: Feminist Perspectives from East-Central Europe. Budapest: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  22. Monro, S. (2015). Bisexuality. Identities, Politics, and Theories. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Nádasdy, Á. (2015a). A vastagbőrű mimóza [Thick- and Thin-Skinned]. Budapest: Magvető.Google Scholar
  24. Nádasdy, Á. (2015b, June 13). Be akarom lopni a melegeket a polgári társadalomba [I Want to Shuffle Gays into Bourgeois Society]. Interview by M. Pálos. Origo.hu. http://www.origo.hu/kultura/kotve-fuzve/20150611-nadasdy-adam-meleg-konzervativ-irodalom-kozelet-orban.html. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.
  25. Renkin, H. Z. (2015). Perverse Frictions: Pride, Dignity, and the Budapest LGBT March. Ethnos—Journal of Anthropology, 80(3), 409–432.Google Scholar
  26. Ritter, K. (2014). ‘Dieses Gefühl irgendwie so ‘n Zuhause gefunden zu haben’. Biografische Konstruktionen von Bisexualität im Kontext monosexueller Ordnung [‘This Feeling of Somehow Having Found a Home’. Biographic Constructions of Bisexuality in the Context of the Monosexual Order]. In B. Magnus Hirschfeld (Ed.), Forschung im Queerformat (pp. 199–214). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Rotkirch, A. (2004). ‘What Kind of Sex Can You Talk About?’ Acquiring Sexual Knowledge in Three Soviet generations. In D. Bertaux, A. Rotkirch, & P. Thompson (Eds.), On Living Through Soviet Russia (pp. 93–119). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Rust, P. C. (1993). ‘Coming Out’ in the Age of Social Constructionism: Sexual Identity Formation Among Lesbian and Bisexual Women. Gender and Society, 7(1), 50–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stella, F. (2015). Lesbian Lives in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia: Post/Socialism and Gendered Sexualities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. szinhaz.hu. (2015, July 13). ‘A világ nem fekete-fehér, hanem színes’ - Fischer Iván Pride beszéde [‘The World Is Not Black-and-White, But Colourful‘—Iván Fischer’s Pride Speech]. szinhaz.hu [‘theatre’.hu]. http://szinhaz.hu/2015/07/13/_a_vilag_nem_fekete-feher_hanem_szines_fischer_ivan_pride_beszede. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.
  31. Takács, J. (2004). Homoszexualitás és társadalom [Homosexuality and Society]. Budapest: ÚMK.Google Scholar
  32. Takács, J. (2015). Disciplining Gender and (Homo)Sexuality in State-Socialist Hungary in the 1970s. European Review of History: Revue Européenne D’histoire, 22(1), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Turai, K. R. (2011). A biszexualitás, a homofóbia és a bifóbia összefüggései. In J. Takács (Ed.), Homofóbia Magyarországon [Homophobia in Hungary] (pp. 55–68). Budapest: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  34. Turai, K. R. (2018). Sexual Transitions: Biographical Bisexuality in Post-Socialist Hungary. Ph.D. Dissertation, Central European University, Budapest.Google Scholar
  35. Ward, J. (2015). Not Gay: Sex Between Straight White Men. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warner, M. (1999). Normal and Normaller: Beyond Gay Marriage. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 5(2), 119–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woodcock, S. (2004). Globalization of LGBT Identities: Containment Masquerading as Salvation or Why Lesbians Have less Fun. In M. Frunză & T.-E. Văcărescu (Eds.), Gender and the (Post) ‘East’/’West’ Divide (pp. 171–188). Cluj-Napoca: LIMES.Google Scholar
  38. Woodcock, S. (2011). A Short History of the Queer Time of ‘Post-Socialist’ Romania, or Are We There Yet? Let’s Ask Madonna! In R. Kulpa & J. Mizielińska (Eds.), De-centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives (pp. 63–84). Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ráhel Katalin Turai
    • 1
  1. 1.Central European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations