The Best Possible Self Intervention: Evidence for Its Efficacy in Multi-cultural Contexts

  • Guadalupe Molinari
  • Ángel Enrique
  • María Dragomir-Davis
  • Cristina BotellaEmail author


Positive psychology interventions (PPI) have proved to produce mild to moderate effects in reducing depression and promoting subjective and psychological wellbeing. However, it is important to explore the optimal conditions under which these interventions work best. In this sense, it has been suggested that for a PPI to be effective in increasing wellbeing is important to take into account not only the characteristics of the exercise but also cultural background. This chapter presents preliminary efficacy of the Best Possible Self Intervention (BPS) supported by Information and Communication Technologies in different populations: Spanish clinical patients, Spanish participants from the general population, and Romanian immigrants. The intervention consists of a written guided imagery exercise that promotes positive future thinking by asking the participants to think about the best possible way that their life could turn out in four life domains: personal, relational, health, and professional. Participants from the Spanish populations used a virtual system to visualize their BPS and incorporate multimedia content to enrich the experience. Moreover, participants had the support of an internet platform to practice the guided imagery exercise online. Participants from the Romanian population performed the BPS exercise in a paper and pencil format. Assessments were conducted at pre-intervention and post-intervention after one month. To improve adherence, we provided support to all participants through text messages twice a week. Results demonstrated changes in depressive symptomatology, positive affect and positive future expectancies.


Best Possible Self Positive psychology intervention Guided imagery Multi-cultural contexts 


  1. Agudelo-Suárez, A., Gil-González, D., Ronda-Pérez, E., Porthé, V., Paramio-Pérez, G., García, A. M., et al. (2009). Discrimination, work and health in immigrant populations in Spain. Social Science and Medicine, 68(10), 1866–1874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agudelo-Suárez, A. A., Ronda-Pérez, E., Gil-González, D., Vives-Cases, C., García, A. M., Ruiz-Frutos, C. … Benavides, F. G. (2011). The effect of perceived discrimination on the health of immigrant workers in Spain. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 652.Google Scholar
  3. Baños, R. M., Etchemendy, E., Farfallini, L., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., & Botella, C. (2014). EARTH of well-being system: A pilot study of an information and communication technology-based positive psychology intervention. Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boselie, J. J., Vancleef, L. M., Smeets, T., & Peters, M. L. (2014). Increasing optimism abolishes pain-induced impairments in executive task performance. Pain, 155, 334–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Botella, J., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en Ciencias Sociales y de la Salud (Meta-analysis in social and health sciences). Madrid: Síntesis.Google Scholar
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Dobrean, A., & David, D. (2012). Adaptarea in limba romana a inventarului BDI-II, In Beck et al. 2012, Inventarul de depresie BDI-II, Editura RTS, Cluj-Napoca.Google Scholar
  9. Dragomir-Davis, A. (2014). Future-directed thinking in general and clinical samples: Validation of the Spanish version of the subjective probability task. Available at
  10. Eichner, K. V., Kwon, P., & Marcus, D. K. (2014). Optimists or optimistic? A taxometric study of optimism. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1056–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Enrique, Á., Bretón-López, J., Molinari, G., Baños, R. M., & Botella, C. (2018). Efficacy of an adaptation of the best possible self intervention implemented through positive technology: A randomized control trial. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 9, 67–69.Google Scholar
  12. Flink, I. K., Smeets, E., Bergbom, S., & Peters, M. L. (2015). Happy despite pain: A pilot study of a positive psychology intervention for patients with chronic pain. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 7, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Georgescu, A., Postelnicu, M., Popescu, A., & Iorgulescu, M. (n.d.). Retrieved from
  14. González-Castro, J. L., & Ubillos, S. (2011). Determinants of psychological distress among migrants from Ecuador and Romania in a Spanish city. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 57(1), 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hanssen, M. M., Peters, M. L., Vlaeyen, J. W. S., Meevissen, Y. M. C., & Vancleef, L. M. G. (2013). Optimism lowers pain: Evidence of the causal status and underlying mechanisms. Pain, 154, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harrist, S., Carlozzi, B. L., McGovern, A. R., & Harrist, A. W. (2007). Benefits of expressive writing and expressive talking about life goals. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(4), 923–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmes, E. A., & Mathews, A. (2005). Mental imagery and emotion: A special relationship? Emotion, 5, 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmes, E. A., & Mathews, A. (2010). Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huffman, J. C., DuBois, C. M., Healy, B. C., Boehm, J. K., Kashdan, T. B., Celano, C. M. … Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). Feasibility and utility of positive psychology exercises for suicidal inpatients. General Hospital Psychiatry, 36, 88–94.Google Scholar
  20. Layous, K., Lee, H., Choi, I., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2013). Culture matters when designing a successful happiness-increasing activity: A comparison of the United States and South Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 1294–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loveday, P. M., Lovell, G. P., & Jones, C. M. (2016). The best possible selves intervention: A review of the literature to evaluate efficacy and guide future research. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
  22. Lyubomirsky, S., & Layous, K. (2013). How do simple positive activities increase well-being? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyubomirsky, S., Diener, E., & King, L. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.Google Scholar
  24. MacLeod, A. K. (1996). Affect, emotional disorder, and future-directed thinking. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meevissen, Y. M., Peters, M. L., & Alberts, H. J. (2011). Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: Effects of a two week intervention. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Molinari, G., García-Palacios, A., Enrique, Á., Roca, P., Fernández-Llanio Comella, N., & Botella, C. (2018). The power of visualization: Back to the future for pain management in fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain Medicine, 19, 1451–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Otero, J. M., Luengo, A., Romero, E., Gómez, J. A., & Castro, C. (1998). Psicología de personalidad. Manual de prácticas (Psychology of personality. Practice manual). Barcelona: Ariel Practicum.Google Scholar
  28. Pascoe, E. A., & Smart Richman, L. (2009). Perceived discrimination and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Peters, M. L., Flink, I. K., Boersma, K., & Linton, S. J. (2010). Manipulating optimism: Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies? Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 204–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peters, M. L. S., Meevissen, Y. M. C., & Hanssen, M. M. (2013). Specificity of the best possible self intervention for increasing optimism: Comparison with a gratitude intervention. Terapia Psicológica, 31, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pietrowsky, R., & Mikutta, J. (2012). Effects of positive psychology interventions in depressive patients: A randomized control study. Psychology, 3, 1067–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quero, S., Molés, M., Pérez, M. A., Botella, C., & Baños, R. M. (2012). An online emotional system to deliver homework assignments for treating adjustment disorders. Journal of CyberTherapy and Rehabilitation, 5, 115–116.Google Scholar
  33. Sandin, B., Chorot, P., Lostao, L., Joiner, T. E., Santed, M. A., & Valiente, R. M. (1999). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo: Validación factorial y convergencia transcultural (The PANAS scales of positive and negative affect: Factor analytic validation and cross-cultural convergence). Psicothema, 11, 37–51.Google Scholar
  34. Sanz, J., García Vera, M. P., Espinosa, R., Fortin, M., & Vázquez, C. (2005). Adaptación española del inventario para la depresión de Beck- II (BDI-II): Propiedades psicométricas en pacientes con trastornos psicológicos (Spanish adaptation of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II): 3. Psychometric features in patients with psychological disorders). Clínica y Salud, 16, 121–142.Google Scholar
  35. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–1078.Google Scholar
  36. Shapira, L. B., & Mongrain, M. (2010). The benefits of self-compassion and optimism exercises for individuals vulnerable to depression. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(5), 377–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guadalupe Molinari
    • 1
  • Ángel Enrique
    • 2
  • María Dragomir-Davis
    • 3
  • Cristina Botella
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.CIBER of Physiopathology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBERObn)ValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Trinity College DublinDublinIreland
  3. 3.University of HoustonHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Universitat Jaume ICastellónSpain

Personalised recommendations