Advertisement

Simulating the Ridesharing Economy: The Individual Agent Metro-Washington Area Ridesharing Model (IAMWARM)

  • Joseph A. E. ShaheenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

The ridesharing economy is experiencing rapid growth and innovation. Companies such as Uber and Lyft are continuing to grow at a considerable pace while providing their platform as an organizing medium for ridesharing services, increasing consumer utility as well as employing thousands in part-time positions. However, many challenges remain in the modeling of ridesharing services, many of which are not currently under wide consideration. In this paper, an agent-based model is developed to simulate a ridesharing service in the Washington, D.C. metropolitan region. The model is used to examine levels of utility gained for both riders (customers) and drivers (service providers) of a generic ridesharing service. A description of the Individual Agent Metro-Washington Area Ridesharing Model (IAMWARM) is provided, as well as a description of a typical simulation run. We investigate the financial gains of drivers for a 24 hour period under two scenarios and two spatial movement behaviors. The two spatial behaviors were random movement and Voronoi movement, which we describe. Both movement behaviors were tested under a stationary run conditions scenario and a variable run conditions scenario. We find that Voronoi movement increased drivers’ utility gained but that emergence of this system property was only viable under variable scenario conditions. This result provides two important insights: The first is that driver movement decisions prior to passenger pickup can impact financial gain for the service and drivers, and consequently, rate of successful pickup for riders. The second is that this phenomenon is only evident under experimentation conditions where variability in passenger and driver arrival rates are administered.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, D.N.: Not just a taxi: for-profit ridesharing, driver strategies, and VMT. Transportation 41(5), 1099–1117 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9531-8MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bash, E.: Dynamic ridesharing: an exploration of the potential for reduction in vehicle miles traveled. Ph.D. Proposal (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cho, S., Yasar, A.U.H., Knapen, L., Bellemans, T., Janssens, D., Wets, G.: A conceptual design of an agent-based interaction model for the carpooling application. Procedia Comput. Sci. 10, 801–807 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.06.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho, S., Yasar, A.-U.-H., Knapen, L., Patil, B., Bellemans, T., Janssens, D., Wets, G.: Social networks in agent-based models for carpooling. In: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, pp. 13–2055 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furuhata, M., Dessouky, M., F., Brunet, M. E., Wang, X., Koenig, S.: Ridesharing: the state-of-the-art and future directions. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 57, 28–46 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.08.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hussain, I., Knapen, L., Galland, S., Yasar, A.-U.-H., Bellemans, T., Janssens, D., Wets, G.: Agent-based simulation model for long-term carpooling: effect of activity planning constraints. Procedia Comput. Sci. 52(Ant), 412–419 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knapen, L., Keren, D., Yasar, A.U.H., Cho, S., Bellemans, T., Janssens, D., Wets, G.: Analysis of the co-routing problem in agent-based carpooling simulation. Procedia Comput. Sci. 10(270833), 821–826 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2012.06.106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knapen, L., Keren, D., Yasar, A.-U.-H., Cho, S., Bellemans, T., Janssens, D., Wets, G.: Estimating scalability issues while finding an optimal assignment for carpooling. Procedia Comput. Sci. 19(Ant), 372–379 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.06.051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, C.J.: The sharing economy: a pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism? Ecol. Econ. 121, 149–159 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.11.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen, J.R., Hovmøller, H., Blyth, P.L., Sovacool, B.K.: Of “white crows” and “cash savers:” a qualitative study of travel behavior and perceptions of ridesharing in Denmark. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 78, 113–123 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nourinejad, M., Roorda, M.J.: Agent-based model for dynamic ridesharing. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 1, 117–132 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.07.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pelzer, D., Xiao, J., Zehe, D., Lees, M.H., Knoll, A.C., Aydt, H.: A partition-based match making algorithm for dynamic ridesharing. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16(5), 2587–2598 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2413453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rayle, L., Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Dai, D., Cervero, R.: App-based, on-demand ride services: comparing taxi and ridesourcing trips and user characteristics in San Francisco. Univ. Calif. Transp. Cent. 94720(August), 1–20 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rayle, L., Dai, D., Chan, N., Cervero, R., Shaheen, S.: Just a better taxi? a survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco. Transp. Policy 45, 168–178 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shaheen, S. A.: Shared mobility innovations and the sharing economy. Transp. Policy, 1–2 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaheen, S. A., Chan, N. D., Gaynor, T.: Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transp. Policy, 1–9 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tran, Q. T., Tainar, D., Safar, M.: Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems. p. 357 (2009). ISBN 9783642037214Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Voronoi, G.: Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Premier mémoire. Sur quelques propriétés des formes quadratiques positives parfaites. Journal Für Die Reine Und Angewandte Mathematik (Crelle’s Journal), 1908 133 (1908).  https://doi.org/10.1515/crll.1908.133.97
  19. 19.
    Wilensky, U.: NetLogo. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL (1999). http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
  20. 20.
    Zargayouna, M., Zeddini, B., Scemama, G., Othman, A.: Agent-based simulator for travelers multimodal mobility. Front. Artif. Intell. Appl. 252, 81–90 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-254-7-81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 22.
    Zolnik, E.J.: The effect of gasoline prices on ridesharing. J. Transp. Geogr. 47, 47–58 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.07.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ORISE Intelligence Community Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Computational and Data SciencesGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations