Advertisement

The Fundamentals of Complex Adaptive Systems

  • Ted CarmichaelEmail author
  • Mirsad Hadžikadić
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) is a framework for studying, explaining, and understanding systems of agents that collectively combine to form emergent, global level properties. These agents can be nearly anything, from ants or bees, to brain cells, to water particles in a weather pattern, to groups of cars or people in a city or town. These agents produce emergent patterns via correlated feedbacks throughout the system, feedbacks that create and fortify a basin of attraction: a persistent pattern of behavior that itself is outside of equilibrium. There is also an ever-growing understanding that similar features in complex systems across a diversity of domains may indicate similar fundamental principles at work, and as such there is often utility in using the key features of one system to gain insight into the workings of seemingly distinct fields. Here we also include a brief review of multiple models that attempt to do exactly this, including some of our previous work. Though there is not complete agreement on all aspects and definitions in this field, this introduction also summarizes our understanding of what defines a CAS, including the concepts of complexity, agents, adaptation, feedbacks, emergence, and self-organization; and places this definition and its key features in a historical context. Finally we briefly discuss two of the common biases often found that the tools of CAS can help counteract: the hierarchical bias, assuming a strong top-down organization; and the complexity bias, the tendency to assign complicated features to agents that turn out to be quite simple.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Some of this material appeared previously, in a slightly changed form, in Managing Complexity: Practical Considerations in the Development and Application of ABMs to Contemporary Policy Challenges [2].

References

  1. 1.
    Axelrod, R.: Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. In: Judd, K.L., Tesfatsion, L. (eds.) Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, pp. 1565–1584. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carmichael, T.: An overview of agent based models. In: Hadzikadic, M., OBrien, S., Khouja, M. (eds.) Managing Complexity: Practical Considerations in the Development and Application of ABMs to Contemporary Policy Challenges, vol. 504. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carmichael, T., Hadzikadic, M.: Emergent features in a general food web simulation: Lotka–Volterra, gause’s law, and the paradox of enrichment. Adv. Complex Syst. 16(08), 1350014 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carmichael, T., Hadzikadic, M.: Predator-prey dynamics and the red queen hypothesis: putting limits on the evolutionary arms race. J. Policy Complex Syst. 2, 1 (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmichael, T., Hadzikadic, M., Dréau, D., Whitmeyer, J.: Towards a general tool for studying threshold effects across diverse domains. In: Ras, Z.W., Ribarsky, W. (eds.) Advances in Information and Intelligent Systems, pp. 41–62. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chalmers, D.J.: Varieties of emergence. Technical Report preprint, Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Vries, H., Biesmeijer, J.C.: Modelling collective foraging by means of individual behaviour rules in honey-bees. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 44(2), 109–124 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Vries, H., Biesmeijer, J.C.: Self-organization in collective honeybee foraging: emergence of symmetry breaking, cross inhibition and equal harvest-rate distribution. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51(6), 557–569 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Epstein, J.M.: Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Epstein, J.M.: Remarks on the foundations of agent-based generative social science. Handb Comput Econ 2, 1585–1604 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Erol, K., Levy, R., Wentworth, J.: Application of agent technology to traffic simulation. In: Proceedings of the Complex Systems, Intelligent Systems and Interfaces (1998)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fromm, J.: Types and forms of emergence. arXiv:nlin/0506028 (2005)
  13. 13.
    Holland, J.H.: Emergence: From Chaos to Order. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, N.F.: Two’s Company, Three is Complexity: A Simple Guide to the Science of all Sciences. Oneworld Pubns Ltd, London (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson, S.: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities and Software. Scribner, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy, J., Eberhart, R.C., Shi, Y.: Swarm Intelligence. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Midgley, D., Marks, R., Kunchamwar, D.: Building and assurance of agent-based models: an example and challenge to the field. J. Bus. Res. 60(8), 884–893 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicolis, G., Prigogine, I.: Self-Organization in Nonequilibrium Systems (1977)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ryan, A.J.: Emergence is coupled to scope, not level. Complexity 13(2), 67–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schelling, T.C.: Dynamic models of segregation. J. Math. Sociol. 1(2), 143–186 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sumpter, D.J.: The principles of collective animal behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 361(1465), 5–22 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tay, N.S., Lusch, R.F.: A preliminary test of hunt’s general theory of competition: using artificial adaptive agents to study complex and ill-defined environments. J. Bus. Res. 58(9), 1155–1168 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Turing, A.M.: The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 237(641), 37–72 (1952)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Waldrop, M.M.: Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. Simon and Schuster, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weaver, W.: Science and complexity. Am. Sci. 36(4), 536–544 (1948)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wilensky, U.: Netlogo flocking model. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. Wiley, New York (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Software and Information SystemsUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.TutorGen, Inc.Fort ThomasUSA

Personalised recommendations