Advertisement

The Practical Applications of Self-Transcendent Wisdom

  • Carolyn M. AldwinEmail author
  • Michael R. Levenson
Chapter

Abstract

Practical wisdom is focused on sound decisions to promote a good life, while self-transcendent wisdom focuses on making ethical decisions for the greater good. Self-transcendence develops through self-knowledge, integration, and non-attachment, which focuses on decentering from egoistic perspectives. It emphasizes the interconnectedness of people and life in general, leading to a focus on ethical issues. Wisdom is generally perceived to be a characteristic of individuals, but it is clear that it develops in a social context. Further, wisdom can be considered an organizational attribute. Not only can organizational cultures promote and support the development of wisdom in individuals, but some have argued that wisdom can also be a characteristic of organizations, such as learning and adapting to new situations, making wise judgments, and focusing on the inherent ethics of any decision-making. Both practical and self-transcendent wisdom are clearly needed in our current economic and political institutions.

Keywords

Self-transcendence Practical wisdom Organizations Ethical decisions 

References

  1. Aldwin, C. M., & Levenson, M. R. (2004). Post-traumatic growth: A developmental perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 19–22.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldwin, C. M., Igarashi, H., & Levenson, M. R. (2019). Wisdom as self-transcendence. In R. Sternberg & J. Glück (Eds.), Handbook of wisdom (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Ardelt, M. (2004). Wisdom as expert knowledge system: A critical review of a contemporary operationalization of an ancient concept. Human Development, 47(5), 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ardelt, M. (2011). Wisdom, age, and well-being. In K. W. Schaie & S. Willis (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (7th ed., pp. 279–291). San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2007). Snakes in suits. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  7. Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom: A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55(1), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnhardt, C. L., & Phillips, C. W. (2017). A developmental perspective on organizing for social responsibility: A framework of wise action for higher education organizations. In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (pp. 77–97). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Bell, C. (2005). Wise organizations? In J. F. Courtney, J. D. Haynes, & D. B. Paradice (Eds.), Inquiring organizations: Moving from knowledge management to wisdom (pp. 229–271). London: IGI Global.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Biloslavo, R., & McKenna, B. (2016). Evaluating the process of wisdom in wise political leaders using a developmental wisdom model. In W. Küpers & D. Pauleen (Eds.), A handbook of practical wisdom (pp. 111–132). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2014). The foundations of posttraumatic growth: An expanded framework. In C. G. Calhoun & R. G. Tedeschi (Eds.), Handbook of posttraumatic growth (pp. 17–37). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Cantal, C., Milfont, T. L., Wilson, M. S., & Gouveia, V. V. (2015). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on dimensions of generalized prejudice in Brazil. European Journal of Personality, 29(1), 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archive of General Psychiatry, 50, 975–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curnow, T. (1999). Wisdom, intuition, and ethics. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  15. Glück, J. (2018). New developments in psychological wisdom research: A growing field of increasing importance. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 73, 1335–1338.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Glück, J., & Bluck, S. (2011). Laypeople’s conceptions of wisdom and its development: Cognitive and integrative views. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(3), 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grossmann, I. (2017). Wisdom in context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience: The disturbing world of the psychopaths among us. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  19. Helson, R., & Wink, P. (1987). Two conceptions of maturity examined in the findings of a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holliday, S. G., & Chandler, M. J. (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Contributions to Human Development, 17, 100.Google Scholar
  21. Igarashi, H., Levenson, M. R., & Aldwin, C. M. (2018). The development of wisdom: A social ecological approach. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Science: Series B, 73(8), 1350–1358.  https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jung, C. G. (1965). Dreams, memories and reflections. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  23. Kohlberg, L., & Ryncarz, R. A. (1990). Beyond justice reasoning: Moral development and consideration of a seventh stage. In C. N. Alexander & E. J. Langer (Eds.), Higher stages of human development: Perspectives on adult growth (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Koller, I., Levenson, M. R., & Glück, J. (2017). What do you think you are measuring? A mixed-methods procedure for assessing the content validity of test items and theory-based scaling. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Küpers, W. M. (2016). The art of practical wisdom: Phenomenology of an embodied, wise ‘inter-practice’ in organization and leadership. In W. Küpers & D. Pauleen (Eds.), A handbook of practical wisdom (pp. 37–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Levenson, M. R. (1992). Rethinking psychopathy. Theory & Psychology, 2(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levenson, M. R., & Aldwin, C. M. (2013). The transpersonal in personal wisdom. In M. Ferrari & N. M. Westrate (Eds.), The scientific study of personal wisdom: From contemplative traditions to neuroscience (pp. 213–228). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Levenson, M. R., & Crumpler, C. A. (1996). Three models of adult development. Human Development, 39(3), 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levenson, M. R., Jennings, P. A., Aldwin, C. M., & Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 60, 127–143.  https://doi.org/10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Limas, M. J., & Hansson, R. O. (2004). Organizational wisdom. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 59(2), 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maxwell, N. (2019). The urgent need for social wisdom. In R. Sternberg & J. Glück (Eds.), Handbook of wisdom (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McKee, P., & Barber, C. (1999). On defining wisdom. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 49, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does spirituality represent the sixth factor of personality? Spiritual transcendence and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reed, P. G. (1991). Toward a nursing theory of self-transcendence: Deductive reformulation using developmental theories. Advance in Nursing Science, 13, 64–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rowley, J., & Gibbs, P. (2008). From learning organization to practically wise organization. The Learning Organization, 15(5), 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sortheix, F. M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2017). Values that underlie and undermine well-being: Variability across countries. European Journal of Personality, 31(2), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Words to the wise about wisdom? Human Development, 47(5), 286–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (2014). A balance theory of wisdom. In J. C. Kaufman & E. F. Grigorenko (Eds.), The essential Sternberg (pp. 353–376). New York: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
  42. Sternberg, R. J. (2018a). Wisdom, foolishness, and toxicity in human development. Research in Human Development, 15(3–4), 200–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2018.1491216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sternberg, R. J. (2018b). Creativity is not enough: The WICS model of leadership. In C. Mainemelis, O. Epitropaki, & R. Kark (Eds.), Creative leadership (pp. 139–155). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Templeton, J. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Spirituality, “expanding circle morality,” and positive youth development. In R. M. Lerner, R. W. Roeser, & E. Phelps, E. (Eds.), Positive youth development & spirituality: From theory to research (pp. 197–209). West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  45. Tornstam, L. (1994). Gerotranscendence: A theoretical and empirical exploration. In L. E. Thomas & S. A. Eisenhandler (Eds.), Aging and the religious dimension (pp. 203–226). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.Google Scholar
  46. Vaillant, G. E. (1995). The wisdom of the ego. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wink, P., & Helson, R. (1997). Practical and transcendent wisdom: Their nature and some longitudinal findings. Journal of Adult Development, 4(1), 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Healthy Aging ResearchOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Human Development & Family SciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations