Advertisement

Gender-Biased Sex Selection in Asia: Motives, Methods, Magnitudes

  • Laura Rahm
Chapter
Part of the Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development book series (DTSD, volume 11)

Abstract

This chapter sets the scene by exploring the motives, methods and magnitudes of gender-biased sex selection (GBSS) drawing from socio-demographic and anthropological research. It starts out by discussing the motives (or reasons) behind GBSS, reviewing gender preferences, family structures, as well as fertility, economic, and political pressures to sex select. These factors are intricately connected. Son preference is ultimately rooted in patrilineal and patrilocal kinship systems, where assets are passed through the male line and sons reside with their parents in old age. Additional economic and political factors (such as major shifts in population policies, economic shocks and political instability) can also contribute to the existence of GBSS. The focus then turns to the different methods used by parents to influence the sex composition of their families and the evolution of these methods (or practices) over time. Special attention is given to female infanticide and neglect, continued child bearing, ultrasound in combination with selective abortions allowing couples to prenatally deselect daughters, and more advanced technologies such as preconception and pre-implementation sex selection. Finally, this chapter highlights the magnitudes (or outcome) of sex selection by giving an overview of affected countries, the number of missing women as well as long-term socio-demographic consequences of sex imbalances at birth.

Keywords

Sex selection and sex determination Kinship systems Gender preferences Marriage squeeze Asia 

References

  1. Almond, D., Edlund, L., & Milligan, K. (2013). Son preference and the persistence of culture: Evidence from South and East Asian immigrants to Canada. Population and Development Review, 39(1), 75–95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00574.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond, D., Li, H., & Zhang, S. (2013). Land reform and sex selection in China (no. w19153). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, F. (1997). Gender preferences for children. Calverton, UK: Macro International.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Attané, I., & Guilmoto, C. Z. (Eds.). (2007). Watering the neighbour’s garden. the growing demographic female deficit in Asia. Paris, France: CICRED.Google Scholar
  6. Barbiéri, M., & Bélanger, D. (Eds.). (2009). Reconfiguring families in contemporary Vietnam. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baruch, S., Kaufman, D., & Hudson, K. L. (2008). Genetic testing of embryos: Practices and perspectives of US in vitro fertilization clinics. Fertility and Sterility, 89(5), 1053–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Basu, D., & de Jong, R. (2010). Son targeting fertility behavior: Some consequences and determinants. Demography, 47(2), 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BBC. (2006, April 5). India’s “bride buying” country. Retrieved February 20, 2016, from http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4862434.stm
  10. Becquet, V. (2015). De l’Iinégalité de Genre à la Sélection Sexuelle Prénatale: La Masculinité des Naissances au Viêt Nam. Retrieved from http://www.theses.fr/s120435
  11. Bennett, N. G. (Ed.). (1983). Sex selection of children. New York, NY: Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Besselink, D. E., Farquhar, C., Kremer, J. A., Marjoribanks, J., & O’Brien, P. A. (2008). Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility. In The Cochrane Collaboration (Ed.), Cochrane database of systematic reviews. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Bhat, P. N. M., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in Northern India. Demography, 40(4), 637–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bien, C. H., Cai, Y., Emch, M. E., Parish, W., & Tucker, J. D. (2013). High adult sex ratios and risky sexual behaviors: A systematic review. PLoS One, 8(8), e71580.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bongaarts, J. (2001). Fertility and reproductive preferences in post-transitional societies. Population and Development Review, 27, 260–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bongaarts, J. (2013). The implementation of preferences for male offspring. Population and Development Review, 39(2), 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bongaarts, J., & Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015). How many more missing women? Excess female mortality and prenatal sex selection, 1970–2050. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caldwell, J. C., & Caldwell, B. K. (2005). Family size control by infanticide in the Great Agrarian Societies of Asia. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36(2), 205–226.Google Scholar
  19. Carlson, E. A. (2013). The 7 sexes: Biology of sex determination. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cho, N.-H. (1994). Gender preference and sex imbalance in the population and their implications in Korea. The Journal of The Population Association of Korea, 17(1), 87–114.Google Scholar
  21. Chun, H., & Das Gupta, M. (2009). Gender discrimination in sex selective abortions and its transition in South Korea. Women’s Studies International Forum, 32(2), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chung, W., & Das Gupta, M. (2007). Why is son preference declining in South Korea? The role of development and public policy, and the implications for China and India (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1020841; p. 33). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
  23. Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coale, A. J. (1991). Excess female mortality and the balance of the sexes in the population: An estimate of the number of “missing females”. Population and Development Review, 17(3), 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Croll, E. (2000). Endangered daughters: Discrimination and development in Asia. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Das Gupta, M. (2015). “Missing girls” in the South Caucasus countries: Trends, possible causes, and policy options (No. WPS7236; pp. 1–34). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  27. Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Bohua, L., Zhenming, X., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Jong, A., Dondorp, W. J., de Die-Smulders, C. E. M., Frints, S. G. M., & de Wert, G. M. W. R. (2010). Non-invasive prenatal testing: Ethical issues explored. European Journal of Human Genetics, 18(3), 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dubuc, S., & Coleman, D. (2007). An increase in the sex ratio of births to india-born mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for sex-selective abortion. Population and Development Review, 33(2), 383–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Durante, K. M., Griskevicius, V., Redden, J. P., & Edward White, A. (2015). Spending on daughters versus sons in economic recessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(3), 435–457.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Duthé, G., Meslé, F., Vallin, J., Badurashvili, I., & Kuyumjyan, K. (2012). High sex ratios at birth in the Caucasus: Modern technology to satisfy old desires. Population and Development Review, 38(3), 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ebenstein, A. (2010). The “missing girls” of China and the unintended consequences of the one child policy. Journal of Human Resources, 45(1), 87–115.  https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.45.1.87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Efrat, Z., Akinfenwa, O. O., & Nicolaides, K. H. (1999). First-trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 13(5), 305–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Eklund, L. (2011). Rethinking son preference – Gender, population dynamics and social change in the People’s Republic of China (Dissertation). Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
  35. Ethics Committee of the American Society of Reproductive Medicine. (2004). Sex selection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Fertility and Sterility, 82(1), 245–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frost, M. D., Puri, M., & Hinde, P. R. A. (2013). Falling sex ratios and emerging evidence of sex-selective abortion in Nepal: Evidence from nationally representative survey data. BMJ Open, 3(5), e002612.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fuse, K. (2008). Cross-national variation in attitudinal measures of gender preference for children: An examination of demographic and health surveys from 40 countries. Calverton, UK: Demographic and Health Research.Google Scholar
  38. Fuse, K., & Crenshaw, E. M. (2006). Gender imbalance in infant mortality: A cross-national study of social structure and female infanticide. Social Science & Medicine, 62(2), 360–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gammeltoft, T. (2007). Prenatal diagnosis in postwar Vietnam: Power, subjectivity, and citizenship. American Anthropologist, 109(1), 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gammeltoft, T., & Nguyen, H. T. T. (2007). The commodification of obstetric ultrasound scanning in Hanoi, Viet Nam. Reproductive Health Matters, 15(29), 163–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. George, S. M. (2013). Hearing on India’s missing girls. Washington, DC: US Congress.Google Scholar
  42. Gleicher, N., & Barad, D. H. (2007). The choice of gender: Is elective gender selection, indeed, sexist? Human Reproduction, 22(11), 3038–3041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Goodkind, D. (1996). On substituting sex preference strategies in East Asia: Does prenatal sex selection reduce postnatal discrimination? Population and Development Review, 22(1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Goodkind, D. (2015). The claim that China’s fertility restrictions contributed to the use of prenatal sex selection: A sceptical reappraisal. Population Studies, 69(3), 263–279.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2015.1103565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012a). Sex imbalances at birth: Current trends, consequences and policy implications. Bangkok, Thailand: UNFPA APRO.Google Scholar
  46. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012b). Skewed sex ratios at birth and future marriage squeeze in China and India, 2005–2100. Demography, 49(1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2013, October 7). Cost of inaction: A focus on prenatal sex selection. Presented at the UNFPA, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015a). Mapping the diversity of gender preferences and sex imbalances in Indonesia in 2010. Population Studies, 69(3), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015b). The masculinization of births. Overview and current knowledge. Population, 70(02), 201–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Guilmoto, C. Z., Dudwick, N., Gjonça, A., & Rahm, L. (2018). How do demographic trends change? The onset of birth masculinization in Albania, Georgia, and Vietnam 1990–2005. Population and Development Review, 44(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Guilmoto, C. Z., & Duthé, G. (2013). Masculinization of births in Eastern Europe. Population & Societies, 506, 4.Google Scholar
  52. Guo, Z., Das Gupta, M., & Li, S. (2016). ‘Missing girls’ in China and India: Trends and policy challenges. Asian Population Studies, 12(2), 135–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gupta, J. A. (2000). New reproductive technologies, women’s health and autonomy: Freedom or dependency. In Indo-Dutch studies on development alternatives (Vol. 25). New Delhi, India: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Hakim, C. (2015). The male sexual deficit: A social fact of the 21st century. International Sociology, 30(3), 314–335.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580915569090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hall, A., Bostanci, A., & John, S. (2009). Ethical, legal and social issues arising from cell-free fetal DNA technologies. Appendix III to the report: Cell-free fetal nucleic acids for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Retrieved from PHG Foundation website: http://www.phgfoundation.org/download/ffdna/ffDNA_appendix.pdf.
  56. Haughton, J., & Haughton, D. (1995). Son preference in Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 26(6), 325–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hesketh, T., & Xing, Z. W. (2006). Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(36), 13271–13275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hudson, V. M. (2016, January 5). Europe’s man problem. Migrants to Europe skew heavily male—and that’s dangerous. Politico Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/europe-refugees-migrant-crisis-men-213500
  59. Hudson, V. M., & Den Boer, A. (2002). A surplus of men, a deficit of peace: Security and sex ratios in Asia’s largest states. International Security, 26(4), 5–38.  https://doi.org/10.1162/016228802753696753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hudson, V. M., & Den Boer, A. (2004). Bare branches: The security implications of Asia’s surplus male population. In BCSIA studies in international security. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. (2014, August 5). Intrauterine insemination (IUI) – Chance of success. Retrieved February 4, 2016, from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/iui-success-rate.html
  62. Hunter, T. M. (2014, June 14). Sex ratio at birth world map 2012. Retrieved March 7, 2018, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2012_Birth_Sex_Ratio_World_Map.jpg
  63. ISUOG. (2011). ISUOG-WFUMB statement on the non-medical use of ultrasound, 2011. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 38(5), 608–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jha, P., Kesler, M. A., Kumar, R., Ram, F., Ram, U., Aleksandrowicz, L., … Banthia, J. K. (2011). Trends in selective abortions of girls in India: Analysis of nationally representative birth histories from 1990 to 2005 and census data from 1991 to 2011. The Lancet, 377(9781), 1921–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jha, P., Kumar, R., Vasa, P., Dhingra, N., Thiruchelvam, D., & Moineddin, R. (2006). Low male-to-female sex ratio of children born in India: National survey of 1·1 million households. The Lancet, 367(9506), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jiang, Q., Li, S., & Feldman, M. W. (2013). China’s population policy at the crossroads: Social impacts and prospects. Asian Journal of Social Science, 41(2), 193–218.  https://doi.org/10.1163/15685314-12341298 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Johansson, S., & Nygren, O. (1991). The missing girls of China: A new demographic account. Population and Development Review, 17(1), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Johnson, K. A. (2016). China’s hidden children: Abandonment, adoption, and the human costs of the one-child policy. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jones, G. W. (2010). Changing marriage patterns in Asia. Singapore, Singapore: Asia Research Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Karabinus, D. S., Marazzo, D. P., Stern, H. J., Potter, D. A., Opanga, C. I., Cole, M. L., … Schulman, J. D. (2014). The effectiveness of flow cytometric sorting of human sperm (MicroSort®) for influencing a child’s sex. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 12(1), 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Kaur, R. (2012). Marriage and migration citizenship and marital experience in cross-border marriages between Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Bangladesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(43), 78–89.Google Scholar
  72. Kawaguchi, D., & Lee, S. (2012). Brides for sale: Cross-border marriages and female immigration. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–37.Google Scholar
  73. Kaye, B., & Jittapong, K. (2014, July 15). In Thailand, baby gender selection loophole draws China, HK women to IVF clinics. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-thailand-ivf-gender-selection/in-thailand-baby-gender-selection-loophole-draws-china-hk-women-to-ivf-clinics-idUSKBN0FK2H020140715
  74. KIHASA, & UNFPA. (1996). Sex preference for children and gender discrimination in Asia. Seoul, South Korea: KIHASA.Google Scholar
  75. Klasen, S., & Wink, C. (2003). “Missing women”: Revisiting the debate. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 263–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kostenzer, J. (2013). Female genital mutilation & cutting in Europe: An overall approach to eliminate the practice. Saarbrücken, Germany: AV Akademikerverlag.Google Scholar
  77. Larsen, U., Chung, W., & Gupta, M. D. (1998). Fertility and son preference in Korea. Population Studies, 52(3), 317–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Le Bach, D., Bélanger, D., & Khuat, T. H. (2007). Transnational migration, marriage and trafficking at the China-Vietnam Border. In I. Attané & C. Z. Guilmoto (Eds.), Watering the neighbour’s garden: The growing demographic female deficit in Asia (pp. 393–425). Paris, France: CICRED.Google Scholar
  79. Lee, H.-K. (2013). Marriage migration. In I. Ness (Ed.), The encyclopedia of global human migration.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444351071.wbeghm353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Li, N., Feldman, M. W., & Tuljapurkar, S. (2000). Sex ratio at birth and son preference. Mathematical Population Studies, 8(1), 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Li, S. (2007, October 29). Imbalanced sex ratio at birth and comprehensive intervention in China (Vol. 24). Hyderabad, India: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  82. McLennan, J. F. (1896). Studies in ancient history: The second series. London, UK: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
  83. Merli, M. G., & Raftery, A. E. (2000). Are births underreported in rural China? Manipulation of statistical records in response to China’s population policies. Demography, 37(1), 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Meslé, F., Vallin, J., & Badurashvili, I. (2007). A sharp increase in sex ratio at birth in the Caucasus. Why? How? In I. Attané & C. Z. Guilmoto (Eds.), Watering the neighbour’s garden. The growing female demographic deficit in Asia (pp. 73–89). Paris, France: CICRED.Google Scholar
  85. Miller, B. D. (1985). Prenatal and postnatal sex-selection in India: The patriarchal context, ethical questions and public policy. Retrieved from http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNAAX045.pdf
  86. Miller, B. D. (1987). Female infanticide and child neglect in rural North India. In N. Scheper-Hughes (Ed.), Child survival (pp. 95–112). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mittwoch, U. (2013). Sex determination. EMBO Reports, 14(7), 588–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Mujezinovic, F., & Alfirevic, Z. (2007). Procedure-related complications of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling: A systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110(3), 687–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Nederhof, A. J. (1985). Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15(3), 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Park, C. B. (1983). Preference for sons, family size, and sex ratio: An empirical study in Korea. Demography, 20(3), 333–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Park, C. B., & Cho, N.-H. (1995). Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: Imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review, 21(1), 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Peng, X., & Huang, J. (1999). Chinese traditional medicine and abnormal sex ratio at birth in China. Journal of Biosocial Science, 31(4), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Pham, B. N., Adair, T., Hill, P. S., & Rao, C. (2012). The impact of the stopping rule on sex ratio of last births in Vietnam. Journal of Biosocial Science, 44(02), 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Population Council, & CREHPA. (2015). Gender-baised sex selection and unbalanced sex ratios at birth in South Asia: Case studies of the situation and promising approaches (p. 122). New Delhi, India: Population Council.Google Scholar
  95. Purewal, N. K. (2010). Son preference: Sex selection, gender and culture in South Asia (English ed). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  96. Puri, M., & Tamang, A. (2015). Understanding factors influencing adverse sex ratios at birth and exploring what works to achieve balance: The situation in selected districts of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Population Council.Google Scholar
  97. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  98. Seidl, C. (1995). The desire for a son is the father of many daughters: A sex ratio paradox. Journal of Population Economics, 8(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. In The New York review of books. New York, NY: Rea S. Hederman.Google Scholar
  100. Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  101. Sen, A. (2003). Missing women: Revisited. BMJ, 327(7427), 1297–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Shijith, V. P., & Sekher, T. V. (2017). ‘Unwanted’ is my name: Culture, patriarchy and gender bias surrounding the Nakusa Girls of Maharashtra. Sociological Bulletin, 66(1), 58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022916687063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (Ed.). (2010). Frameworks of choice: Predictive and genetic testing in Asia. Amsterdam, Netherland: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  104. South, S. J., & Trent, K. (2010). Imbalanced sex ratios, men’s sexual behavior, and risk of sexually transmitted infection in China. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(4), 376–390.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510386789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. ToI. (2012, January 7). Govt mulls ban on portable ultrasound machines. The Times of India.Google Scholar
  106. Tucker, J. D., Henderson, G. E., Wang, T. F., Huang, Y. Y., Parish, W., Pan, S. M., … Cohen, M. S. (2005). Surplus men, sex work, and the spread of HIV in China. AIDS, 19(6), 539–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. UNDESA. (2013). World population policies 2013. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  108. UNFPA. (2012). Sex imbalances at birth: Current trends, consequences and policy implications. Bangkok, Thailand: UNFPA Asia and the Pacific Regional Office.Google Scholar
  109. UNFPA Georgia. (2017). Trends in the sex ratio at birth in Georgia. An overview based on the 2014 general population census data. Tbilisi, Georgia: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  110. UNFPA Vietnam. (2011). Son preference in Viet Nam: Ancient desires, advancing technologies (p. 60). Hanoi, Vietnam: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  111. UNFPA Vietnam. (2015). Sex ratio at birth in Viet Nam: New evidence from the intercensal population and housing survey in 2014 (p. 44). Hanoi, Vietnam: UNFPA.Google Scholar
  112. University of Zurich. (2016, June 16). Type of Kinship system. Retrieved December 7, 2017, from http://www.worlddevelopment.uzh.ch/dam/jcr:00000000-1f1f-184b-0000-00004203bdfb/a6-vws1.pdf
  113. Urdal, H. (2006). A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), 607–629.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2006.00416.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Walonick, D. S. (1993). An overview of forecasting methodology. Retrieved February 20, 2016, from http://www.statpac.org/research-library/forecasting.htm
  115. Whittaker, A. (2011). Cross-border assisted reproduction care in Asia: Implications for access, equity and regulations. Reproductive Health Matters, 19(37), 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. WHO. (2011). Preventing gender-biased sex selection: An interagency statement OHCHR, UNFPA, UNICEF, UN Women and WHO. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  117. WHO. (2016). Gender and genetics: Sex selection and discrimination. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from World Health Organization: Genomic Resource Centre website: http://www.who.int/genomics/gender/en/index4.html
  118. Williamson, L. (1978). Infanticide: An anthropological analysis. In M. Kohl (Ed.), Infanticide and the value of life (pp. 61–73). Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  119. Woetzel, J., Madgavkar, A., Ellingrud, K., Labaye, E., Devillard, S., Kutcher, E., … Krishnan, M. (2015). The power of parity: How advancing women’s equality can add $12 trillion to global growth (p. 168). New York, NY: McKinsey Global Institute.Google Scholar
  120. Woo, J. (2002). A short history of amniocentesis, fetoscopy and chorionic villus sampling. Retrieved February 5, 2016, from http://www.ob-ultrasound.net/amniocentesis.html
  121. World Bank. (2018). Total population and fertility rate in selected countries of Asia and the Caucasus. Retrieved December 14, 2018, from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?end=2017&locations=CN-VN-IN-KR-AL-XK-ME-AZ-GE-AM&start=2017&view=bar
  122. Wright, C. F., & Burton, H. (2008). The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis. Human Reproduction Update, 15(1), 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Zeng, Y., Tu, P., Gu, B., Xu, Y., Li, B., & Li, Y. (1993). Causes and implications of the recent increase in the reported sex ratio at birth in China. Population and Development Review, 19(2), 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zhou, C., Wang, X., Zhou, X., & Hesketh, T. (2012). Son preference and sex-selective abortion in China: Informing policy options. International Journal of Public Health, 57(3), 459–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Zhu, W. X., Lu, L., & Hesketh, T. (2009). China’s excess males, sex selective abortion, and one child policy: Analysis of data from 2005 national intercensus survey. BMJ, 338, b1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Rahm
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Population and DevelopmentParisFrance

Personalised recommendations