Advertisement

Sex in the School: Adolescent Sexuality, Sexual Space and Sex Education in Marzipan

  • Dorottya Rédai
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education book series (GED)

Abstract

This chapter starts exploring young people’s sexuality. First, respondents’ start of sexual activity, ideas and practices about contraception and STI prevention, and experiences of sexual abuse are discussed. She also reflects on challenges with finding LGBT respondents. Then she discusses how sexuality is present in the physical space of Marzipan and argues that schools are a space for sexual activities, not only a space for the constitution of sexual subjectivities, and that school is a specific sexual space that disrupts the public/private divide. The following section introduces institutional sex education policies and practices in Hungarian schools. Rédai problematizes sex education in Marzipan from a methodological perspective and argues that sex education can reproduce social inequalities by addressing only specific issues of sexuality and students with specific subjectivities.

Bibliography

  1. Alldred, P., & David, M. E. (2007). Get real about sex: The politics and practice of sex education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, L. (2004). Beyond the birds and the bees: Constituting a discourse of erotics in sexuality education. Gender and Education, 16(2), 151–167.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250310001690546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen, L. (2007). Denying the sexual subject: Schools’ regulation of student sexuality. British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 221–234.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701208282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, L. (2013). Behind the bike sheds: Sexual geographies of schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34(1), 56–75.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.1012.704719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berlant, L., & Warner, M. (1998). Sex in public. Critical Inquiry, 24(2), 547–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braun, V. (2013). ‘Proper sex without annoying things’: Anti-condom discourse and the ‘nature’ of (hetero)sex. Sexualities, 16(3–4), 361–382.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460713479752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buston, K., Wight, D., & Scott, S. (2001). Difficulty and diversity: The context and practice of sex education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(3), 353–368.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690120067971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cameron-Lewis, V., & Allen, L. (2013). Teaching pleasure and danger in sexuality education. Sex Education, 13(2), 121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2012.697440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corteen, K. M. (2006). Schools’ fulfilment of sex and relationship education documentation: Three school-based case studies. Sex Education, 6(1), 77–99.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810500508741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epstein, D., O’Flynn, S., & Telford, D. (2001). “Othering” education: Sexualities, silences, and schooling. Review of Research in Education, 25, 127–179.Google Scholar
  11. Epstein, D., O’Flynn, S., & Telford, D. (2003). Silenced sexualities in schools and universities. Stoke on Trent, UK and Sterling, VA: Trentham Books.Google Scholar
  12. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA). (2014). Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. Main results. http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra-2014-vaw-survey-main-results-apr14_en.pdf.
  13. Fields, J., Gilbert, J., & Miller, M. (2015). Sexuality and education: Toward the promise of ambiguity. In J. DeLamater & R. F. Plante (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of sexualities (pp. 371–388). Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, and London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fields, J., Mamo, L., Gilbert, J., & Lesko, N. (2014). Beyong bullying. Contexts, 13(4), 80–83.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1536504214558226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fine, M., & McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review, 76(3), 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  18. García, L. (2009). “Now why do you want to know about that?” Heteronormativity, sexism, and racism in the sexual (mis)education of Latina youth. Gender and Society, 23, 520–541.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243209339498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorgos, L. M., & Marrazzo, J. M. (2011). Sexually transmitted infections among women who have sex with women. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 53, 84–91.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregor, A. (2014). Nyílt titkok – a nők elleni otthoni erőszak észlelése és az ezzel kapcsolatos vélemények a magyarországi lakosság körében [Open secrets. Perceptions and views of domestic violence against women in the Hungarian population]. Replika, 85–86, 13–33.Google Scholar
  21. Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hughes, C., & Evans, A. (2003). Health needs of women who have sex with women: Healthcare workers need to be aware of their specific needs. British Medical Journal, 327(7421), 939–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson, S., & Weatherall, A. (2010). The (im)possibilities of feminist school based sexuality education. Feminism Psychology, 20, 166–185.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353509349603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jeyasingham, D. (2010). Building heteronormativity: The social and material reconstruction of men’s public toilets as spaces of heterosexuality. Social and Cultural Geography, 11(4), 307–325.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14649361003787706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson, P. (2007). Ordinary folk and cottaging: Law, morality, and public sex. Journal of Law and Society, 34(4), 520–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kehily, M. J. (2002). Sexuality, gender and schooling: Shifting agendas in social learning. London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  27. Kehily, M. J. (2012). Contextualising the sexualisation of girls debate: Innocence, experience and young female sexuality. Gender and Education, 24(3), 255–268.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.670391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  29. Krebbekx, W. (2018). What else can sex education do? Logics and effects in classroom practices. Sexualities, 0(0), 1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718779967.
  30. Lahelma, E., Palmu, T., & Gordon, T. (2000). Intersecting power relations in teachers’ experiences of being sexualized or harassed by students. Sexualities, 3(4), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lees, S. (1993). Sugar and spice: Sexuality and adolescent girls. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Lewis, J., & Knijn, T. (2003). Sex education materials in the Netherlands and in England and Wales: A comparison of content, use and teaching practice. Oxford Review of Education, 29(1), 113–132.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498032000045395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moran, J. P. (2000). Teaching sex: The shaping of adolescence in the 20th century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. O’Flynn, S., & Epstein, D. (2005). Standardising sexuality: Embodied knowledge, “achievement” and “standards”. Social Semiotics, 15(2), 185–210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330500154741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parker, R., Wellings, K., & Lazarus, J. W. (2009). Sexuality education in Europe: An overview of current policies. Sex Education, 9(3), 227–242.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810903059060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parti, K., Szabó, J., & Virág, G. (2016). A média azt üzente… Szexuális erőszakkal kapcsolatos ismeretek, vélemények és attitűdök vizsgálata egy médiakampány kapcsán [The media says… An analysis of knowledges, opinions and attitudes about sexual violence apropos of a media campaign]. Médiakutató, 16(2), 7–24.Google Scholar
  37. Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Masculinity and sexuality in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Powell, A. (2010). Sex, power and consent: Youth culture and the unwritten rules. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rasmussen, M. L. (2009). Beyond gender identity? Gender and Education, 21(4), 431–447.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802473958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rasmussen, M. L. (2012). Pleasure/desire, sexularism and sexuality education. Sex Education, 12(4), 469–481.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2012.677204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rasmussen, M. L., Rofes, E., & Talburt, S. (Eds.). (2004). Youth and sexualities: Pleasure, subversion and insubordination in and out of schools. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Rédai, D., & Sáfrány, R. (Eds.). (2019). Gender in national education policy documents, teaching handbooks and guidelines and teacher training curricula in Austria, the Czech Republic and Hungary (Comparative Report for the Erasmus + Project “Towards Gender Sensitive Education”, Project No. 2017-1-CZ01-KA201-035485). http://gendersensed.eu/outputs/.
  43. Ringrose, J. (2013). Postfeminist education? Girls and the sexual politics of schooling. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Semsey, G. (2016). A szexuális nevelés gyakorlata a magyarországi gimnáziumokban [Practices of sexual education in grammar schools in Hungary] (PhD dissertation). Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology, Budapest.Google Scholar
  45. Simich, R., & Fábián R. (2010). Iskola – egészségfejlesztés – szexedukáció. Veszélyeztetett korú diákok prevenciós igényei és szükségletei [School—Health development—Sex education: The prevention wants and needs of students of at-risk age]. Budapest: Országos Egészségfejlesztési Intézet. http://www.oefi.hu/tanulmany_szex.pdf.
  46. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, self, culture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Talburt, S. (2004). Constructions of LGBT youth: Opening up subject positions. Theory into Practice, 43(2), 116–121.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4302_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Temple, J. R. (2005). “People who are different from you”: Heterosexism in Quebec high school textbooks. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(3), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tsaliki, L. (2015). Popular culture and moral panics about ‘children at risk’: Revisiting the sexualisation-of-young-girls debate. Sex Education, 15(5), 500–514.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2015.1022893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Waites, M. (2005). The age of consent: Young people, sexuality and citizenship. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. WHO Regional Office for Europe & BZgA. (2010). Standards for sexuality education in Europe: A framework for policy-makers, educational and health authorities and specialists. Cologne: Federal Centre for Health Education, BZgA.Google Scholar

Policy Documents

  1. A Nemzeti Alaptanterv 2007 [National Core Curriculum 2007]. Ministry of Human Resources. http://www.nefmi.gov.hu/kozoktatas/tantervek/nemzeti-alaptanterv-nat.
  2. A Nemzeti Alaptanterv 2012 [National Core Curriculum 2012]. Magyar Közlöny, 2012(66). http://www.budapestedu.hu/data/cms149320/MK_12_66_NAT.pdf.
  3. Kerettanterv a szakközépiskolák 9-12. évfolyama számára [Frame Curriculum for years 9–10 of technical schools]. (2008). Ministry of Human Resources. http://www.nefmi.gov.hu/kozoktatas/tantervek/oktatasi-kulturalis.
  4. Segédlet az iskolai egészségnevelési, egészségfejlesztési program elkészítéséhez [Guideline for schools for the preparation of health education programmes]. (2004). Ministry of Education. http://www.nefmi.gov.hu/kozoktatas/egeszsegfejlesztes/segedlet-iskolai.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorottya Rédai
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gender StudiesCentral European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations