Design Analysis Tasks in Simulation of Engine and Powertrain Dynamics: An Overview

  • Tigran ParikyanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)


The purpose of the present paper is to give an overview of the typical design analysis tasks referring to engine/powertrain dynamics in the concept phase of calculation project, and to show their sequence and interconnection within a single simulation workflow.

The role and place of the concept-phase simulation together with the high-end one within a calculation project is outlined and their synergy is discussed.


Powertrain dynamics simulation software design analysis concept phase 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Parikyan, T., „Early Concept Phase Simulation: How to Become Faster in Powertrain Dy-namics Calculation Project While Keeping High Quality of Results,“ Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Mechanical Engineering Solutions Design, Simulation, Testing and Manufacturing, Yere-van, Armenia, 2018, Abstract to keynote lecture MES2018-K1.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EXCITETM Designer, Software package for crank train and driveline analysis, AVL, Release v2018.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    EXCITETM Power Unit, Software package for flexible multi-body dynamics, AVL, Release v2018.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Parikyan, et al., „Equivalent Modeling of Torsional Vibration Dampers in Frequency and in Time Domain for a Smooth Transition Between Concept and Design Phases“, Torsional Vibration Symposium, Paper No. 3A–2, Salzburg (2017).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parikyan, T., Resch, T., and Priebsch, H.H., “Structured model of crankshaft in the simula-tion of engine dynamics with AVL EXCITE”, ASME Paper 2001-ICE-435, ICE-Vol. 37-3, p105-114 (2001).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Todorovic G. and Parikyan T., „Automated Generation of Crankshaft Dynamic Model to Reduce Engine Development Time“, SAE Paper 2003-01-0926 (2003).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Parikyan, N. Naranca, and J. Neher, “Powertrain Resilient Mounting Design Analysis”, ASME Paper ICEF2018-9539.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parikyan, T., “Unified Approach to Generate Crankshaft Dynamic Models for 3D and Tor-sional Vibration Analyses,” ASME Paper ICES2003-591 (2003).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parikyan, T., “Complex Modes Analysis for Powertrain and Driveline Applications”, pp. 2761-2774, International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering ISMA, Leu-ven, Belgium (2016).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Janic, et al., “Development of Industrial Continuously Variable Electromechanical Drivetrain Systems Based on Virtual Model Approach”, Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Mechanical En-gineering Solutions: Design, Simulation, Testing and Manufacturing (MES-2018), Paper No. MES2018-05 (accepted for publication), Yerevan, Armenia (Sept. 2018).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parikyan, T., “Multi-Cycle Torsional Vibration Simulation with AVL EXCITE Designer,” ASME Paper ICEF2011-60091 (2011).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parikyan, T., and Resch, T., “Statically indeterminate main bearing load calculation in fre-quency domain for usage in early concept phase, ASME Paper ICEF2012-92164 (2012).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Calculation of Crankshafts for Diesel Engines, Classification Notes No. 41.3, DNV, Janu-ary 2002.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Resch, T., Knaus, O., Mlinar, S., and Pogatsch, G., „Application of Multi-Body Dynamics for the Crankshaft Layout in the Concept Phase“, MTZ Paper 11 (2004).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sandberg, E. (DNV AS, Norway), “Some classification aspects on crankshafts”. CIMAC Congress 2004, Kyoto, Paper No. 13.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    H.-J. Butenschön, “Das hydrodynamische, zylindrische Gleitlager endlicher Breite unter in-stationärer Belastung”, Diss. Dr.-Ing., Karlsruhe, 1976.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AVL List GmbHGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations