Advertisement

Linear Pentapods with a Simple Singularity Variety – Part II: Computation of Singularity-Free Balls

  • Arvin RasoulzadehEmail author
  • Georg Nawratil
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

The configuration space of a linear pentapod can be defined as the set of all points (u, v, w, px , py , pz) 6 located on the singular quadric Γ : u 2 + v2 + w2 = 1, where (u, v, w) determines determines the orientation of the linear platform and (px , py , pz) its position. In such terminology, the set of all singular robot configurations is obtained by intersecting Γ with a cubic hypersurface Σ in ℝ6, which is only quadratic in the orientation variables and position variables, respectively. We study the computational aspects of the determination of singularity-free balls under the design restrictions that Σ is either (1) linear in position variables or (2) linear in orientation variables. It turns out that for these pentapod designs the computation of singularity-free balls in the configuration space simplifies considerably. One can even obtain a closed form solution, which is paving the way for a real-time singularity-free path planning/optimization in the configuration space.

Keywords

Linear pentapods Distance computation Singularity-free balls 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research is supported by Grant No. P 24927-N25 of the Austrian Science Fund FWF. Moreover the first author is funded by the Doctoral College “Computational Design” of Vienna University of Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Borràs, F. Thomas, Singularity-invariant leg substitutions in pentapods, in: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, IEEE, 2010, pp. 2766–2771Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Weck, D. Staimer, Parallel kinematic machine tools–current state and future potentials, CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology 51 (2) (2002) 671–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.-D. Zhang, S.-M. Song, Forward kinematics of a class of parallel (Stewart) platforms with closed-form solutions, Journal of Field Robotics 9 (1) (1992) 93–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Nawratil, J. Schicho, Self-motions of pentapods with linear platform, Robotica (2015) 1–29Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Nawratil, On the line-symmetry of self-motions of linear pentapods, in: Advances in Robot Kinematics 2016, Springer, 2018, pp. 149–159Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Rasoulzadeh, G. Nawratil, Rational parametrization of linear pentapod’s singularity variety and the distance to it, in: Computational Kinematics, Springer, 2018, pp. 516–524 (extended version on arXiv:1701.09107)
  7. 7.
    A. Rasoulzadeh, G. Nawratil, Linear pentapods with a simple singularity variety – part I: Determination and Redundant Designs, submitted to IFToMM World Congress 2019Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Rasoulzadeh, G. Nawratil, Variational path optimization of pentapods with simple singularity variety, in preparationGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Nawratil, Point-models for the set of oriented line-elements–a survey, Mechanism and Machine Theory 111 (2017) 118–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Borras, F. Thomas, E. Ottaviano, M. Ceccarelli, A reconfigurable 5-dof 5-spu parallel platform, in: Proc. of ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots (ReMAR), IEEE, 2009, pp. 617–623Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.-C. Fauge`re, D. Lazard, Combinatorial classes of parallel manipulators, Mechanism and Machine Theory 30 (6) (1995) 765–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Geometry and Computational DesignVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations