This paper presents a design of rope–bar variable geometry truss manipulator, which consists of two models. Then, the revised kinematics with the n-module manipulator is analyzed. Based on the revised kinematic model, the workspace of a manipulator is solved. These results could be potentially applied to the engineering application.
This work is financially supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number U1613201).
K Miura, H Furuya, K Suzuki. Variable geometry truss and its application to deployable truss and space crane arm. Acta Astronautica. 1985, 12(7-8): 599-607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
K Miura, H Furuya. Adaptive structure concept for future space applications. AIAA Journal. 1988, 26(26): 995-1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Y Zhao, S Hu, Y Yang. Inverse kinematics for the variable geometry truss manipulator via a Lagrangian dual method. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems. 2016, 13(6): 256114315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
J M Porta, F Thomas. Closed-form position analysis of variable geometry trusses. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 2017, 109: 14-21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R L Williams. Kinematic Modeling of a Double Octahedral Variable Geometry Truss (VGT) as an Extensible Gimbal. NASA Technical Memorandum 109127, NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA 1994.Google Scholar
R L Williams, E R Hexter. Maximizing kinematic motion for a 3-DOF VGT module. Journal of Mechanical Design. 1998, 120(2): 333-336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L M Macareno, J Agirrebeitia, C Angulo, et al. FEM subsystem replacement techniques for strength problems in variable geometry trusses. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design. 2008, 44(6-7): 346-357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar