Simplified Map-based Selection of Optimal Spindle Speeds When Milling Complex Structures

  • Krzysztof J. Kalinski
  • Marek A. GalewskiEmail author
  • Michal R. Mazur
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)


In the paper a method for selecting optimal spindle speeds for complex structures during milling operations is presented. It is based on the selection of the spindle speed in accordance with a simple equation resulting from the minimisation of vibration energy, which leads to the minimisation of the work of cut-ting forces presented in previous elaborations by the authors [1]. Optimal spindle speeds are obtained for many points selected on machined surface thanks to the results of the modal test. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified based on the results of experimental research. Reduction of vibration level, improvement of surface quality and reduction of milling time were obtained.


Face milling Vibration surveillance Optimal spindle speed 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The research was carried out as a part of tasks financed by the Polish National Centre for Research and Development, project TANGO1/266350/NCBR/2015, on “Application of selected mechatronic solutions for supervising the machining of large-size work-pieces on multi-axis machining centres”.

Experimental investigations on the MIKROMAT 20V portal machining centre were made thanks to cooperation with PHS HYDROTOR S.A. in Tuchola, Poland.


  1. 1.
    Kaliński K. J., Galewski M. A.: Optimal Spindle Speed Determination for Vibration Reduction During Ball-End Milling of Flexible Details. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 92, 19-30 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quintana G., Ciurana J.: Chatter in machining processes: a review. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 51, 363-376 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tomkow J.:. Vibrostability of machine tools; The Scientific and Technical Publication: War-saw. Poland (1997) (in Polish).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Munoa J., Beudaert X., Dombovari Z., Altintas Y., Budak E., Brecher C., Stepan G.: Chatter suppression techniques in metal cutting. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 65, 785–808 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalinski K. J., Mazur M. R., Galewski M. A.: High speed milling vibration surveillance with the use of the map of optimal spindle speeds, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on High Speed Machining, ENIM, Metz, 300-305 (2010).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kalinski K. J., Mazur M. R., Galewski M. A.: Optimal Spindle Speed Map for Chatter Vibration Reduction During Milling of Bow Thruster Blade. Solid State Phenomena. 198, 686-691 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalinski K. J., Galewski M. A., Mazur M. R.: High Speed Milling vibration surveillance with optimal spindle speed based on optimal speeds map. Key Engineering Materials. 597, 125-130 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kalinski K. J., Galewski M. A.: Chatter vibration surveillance by the optimal-linear spindle speed control. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 25(1), 383-399 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soliman E., Ismail F.: Chatter suppression by adaptive speed modulation. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 37 (3), 355–369 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jemielniak K., Widota A.: Suppression of self-excited vibration by the spindle speed variation method. International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research. 24, 207-214 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liao Y. S., Young Y. C.: A new on-line spindle speed regulation strategy for chatter control. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 35(6), 651-660 (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tarng Y. S., Lee E. C.,: A Critical Investigation of the Phase Shift Between the Inner and Outer Modulation for the Control of Machine Tool Chatter, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture. 37, 1661–1672 (1997).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kalinski K. J.: The finite element method application to linear closed loop steady system vibration analysis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 39, 315-330 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Uriarte L., Zatarain M., Axinte D., et al.: Machine tools for large parts. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology. 62(2), 731–750 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarhan A. D., Besharaty S. R., Akbaria J., Hamdi M.: Improvement on a CNC Gantry Machine Structure Design for Higher Machining Speed Capability. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering. 9, 534–538 (2015).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heylen W., Lammens S., Sas P.: Modal analysis theory and testing. KU Leuven; (2007).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Galewski M.A.: Application of the LabView Environment for Experimental Modal Analysis Support. In: From Finite Elements Method to Mechatronics, Eds. K. J. Kaliński, K. Lipiński, The Publication of Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, 105-118 (2017) (in Polish).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringGdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations