Advertisement

Kinematic Tangent Cone – A useful Concept for the local Mobility and Singularity Analysis

  • Andreas MüllerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

It is crucial to determine the mobility in regular and singular configurations of a mechanism. At a configuration space singularity, a mechanism can branch between different motion modes. All reported approaches to the local mobility analysis aim to identify possible finite motions, more precisely tangents to these motions. The latter is formalized by the concept of a kinematic tangent cone. It is shown how this can be used to identify the motion modes meeting at a singularity. A rigorous definition of motion modes is introduced, and smooth motion modes are defined as such were smooth finite motions are possible. An example is given for singularities leading to a smooth and a non-smooth motion mode.

Keywords

Mobility singularities configuration space higher-order analysis kinematic tangent cone kinematotropic reconfigurable 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Connelly and H. Servatius. Higher-order rigidity–what is the proper definition? Discrete. Comput. Geom., 11:193–200, 1994.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Gallardo-Alvarado and J.M. Rico-Martinez. Jerk influence coefficients via screw theory, of closed chains. Meccanica, 36:213–228, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    C. Galleti and P. Fangella. Single-loop kinematotropic mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory, 36:743–761, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    X. He, X. Kong, S. Caro D. Chablat, and G. Hao. Kinematic analysis of a single-loop reconfigurable 7r mechanism with multiple operation modes. Robotica, 32:1171–1188, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C.H. Kuo, J.S. Dai, and H.S. Yan. Reconfiguration principles and strategies for reconfigurable mechanism. ASME/IFToMM International Conference on Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots, pages 1–7, 22-24 June, 2009.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Lerbet. Analytic geometry and singularities of mechanisms. ZAMM, Z. angew. Math. Mech., 78(10b):687–694, 1999.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P.C. López-Custodio, A. Müller, and J.M. Ricoand J.S. Dai. A synthesis method for 1-dof mechanisms with a cusp in the configuration space. Mech. Mach. Theory, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2018.09.008, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    J.M. Rico Martinez, J. Gallardo, and J. Duffy. Screw theory and higher order kinematic analysis of open serial and closed chains. Mech. Mach. Theory, 34(4):559–586, 1999.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Müller. Local kinematic analysis of closed-loop linkages -mobility, singularities, and shakiness. ASME J. of Mech. and Rob., 8, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Müller. Higher-order constraints for linkages with lower kinematic pairs. Mech. Mach. Theory, 100:33–43, 2016.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    A. Müller. Higher-order analysis of kinematic singularities of lower pair linkages and serial manipulators. ASME J. Mech. Rob., 10(1), 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Müller. Local investigation of mobility and singularities of linkages. In A. Müller and D. Zlatanov, editors, Singular Configurations of Mechanisms and Manipulators, CISM 589. Springer, 2019.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Müller. A screw approach to the approximation of the local geometry of the configuration space and of the set of configurations of certain rank of lower pair linkages. ASME J. Mech. Rob., to appear 2019.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Müller and S. Piipponen. On regular kinematotropies. 14th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Taipei, Taiwan, pages 1–8. IFToMM, 25-30 October, 2015.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    D.B. O’Shea and L.C. Wilson. Limits of tangent spaces to real surfaces. American Journal of Mathematics, 126(5):951–980, 2004.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    H. Whitney. Local properties of analytic varieties. Differential and Combinatorial Topology, A Symposium in Honor of M. Morse. Princeton, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    K. Wohlhart. Kinematotropic linkages. In V. Parent-Castelli J. Lenarčič editor, Recent Advances in Robot Kinematics, pages 359–368. Springer, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Johannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations