Advertisement

Utilization of Non-Conformal Wheel Surfaces for Railway Dynamics

  • Filipe MarquesEmail author
  • Hugo Magalhães
  • João Pombo
  • Jorge Ambrósio
  • Paulo Flores
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

The dynamic analysis of railway systems using multibody systems formulation is nowadays a reliable tool for several studies, in which the wheelrail contact interaction has significant importance. The definition of contacting geometries affects directly the dynamic response of the system. For sake of simplicity and computational efficiency, some authors simplify the wheel profile to avoid its concave part. This work intends to study the impact of utilizing a simplified non-conformal profile instead of a real wheel profile. For this purpose, an Hertzian-based contact force model is used to compute either the normal and creep forces. A wheelset rolling over a straight track is used as demonstration case. The results show that although the location of the contact points is similar, the use of simplified wheel profile may have an extensive impact on the dynamic response of the system.

Keywords

Railway Dynamics Wheel Profile Conformal Contact 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first and second authors are supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under grant PD/BD/114154/2016, MIT Portugal Program, and SFRH/BD/96695/2013, respectively. This work has been supported by FCT with the reference project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-028424, by FEDER funds through the COMPETE 2020 - Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização. This work is also supported by FCT with the reference project UID/EEA/04436/2019.

References

  1. 1.
    Magalhães, H., Madeira, J.F.A., Ambrósio, J., Pombo, J.: Railway vehicle performance optimisation using virtual homologation. Vehicle System Dynamics 54(9), 1177-1207 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruni, S., Vinolas, J., Berg, M., Polach, O., Stichel, S.: Modelling of suspension compo-nents in a rail vehicle dynamics context. Vehicle System Dynamics 49(7), 1021-1072 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meymand, S.Z., Keylin, A., Ahmadian, M.: A survey of wheel–rail contact models for rail vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 54(3), 386-428 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Persson, I., Iwnicki, S.D.: Optimization of railway wheel profiles using a genetic algo-rithm. Vehicle System Dynamics, 41, 517-527 (2004).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braghin, F., Lewis, R., Dwyer-Joyce, R.S., Bruni, S.: A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear, 261(11-12), 1253-1264 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Silva, M.: A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Vehicle System Dynamics, 45(2), 165-189 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marquis, B., Pascal, J.P.: Report on a railway Benchmark simulating a single wheelset without friction impacting a rigid track. Vehicle System Dynamics 46(1-2), 93-116 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sugiyama, H., Araki, K., Suda, Y.: On-line and off-line wheel/rail contact algorithm in the analysis of multibody railroad vehicle systems. Journal of Mechanical Science and Tech-nology, 23, 991-996 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Recuero, A.M., Shabana, A.A.: A Simple Procedure for the Solution of Three-Dimensional Wheel/Rail Conformal Contact Problem. Journal of Computational and Non-linear Dynamics, 9(3), 034501 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marques, F., Magalhães, H., Ambrósio, J., Flores, P.: Approach for Conformal Contact Detection for Wheel-Rail Interaction, in B. Corves, P. Wenger and M. Hüsing (Eds.), Eu-CoMeS 2018: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Mechanism Science, Mech-anisms and Machine Science, vol. 59, pp. 71-78 (2019).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    UIC 510-2. Trailing Stock: Wheels and Wheelsets. Conditions Concerning the Use of Wheels of Various Diameters. (2004).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hertz, H.: Über die Berührung fester elastischer Körper. Journal reine und an-gewandte Mathematik, 92, 156-171 (1881)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lankarani, H.M., Nikravesh, P.E.: A Contact Force Model With Hysteresis Damping for Impact Analysis of Multibody Systems. Journal of Mechanical Design, 112(3), 369-376 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Polach, O.: A Fast Wheel-Rail Forces Calculation Computer Code. Vehicle System Dy-namics, Sup. 33, 728-739 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nikravesh, P.E.: Computer-Aided Analysis of Mechanical Systems, Prentice Hall, Eng-lewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1988).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pombo, J. A Multibody Methodology for Railway Dynamics Applications. PhD Thesis, Instituto Superior Técnico, Portugal (2004).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    BS EN 13674-1: 2011. Railway applications - Track - Rail - Part 1: Vignole railway rails 46 kg/m and above. (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CMEMS-UMinho, Universidade do MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.LAETA, IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Institute of Railway Research, School of Computing and EngineeringUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK
  4. 4.ISEL, IPLLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations