Advertisement

Influence of imperfect joints and geometrical tolerances on a circuit breaker dynamics

  • Narendra AkhadkarEmail author
  • Vincent Acary
  • Bernard Brogliato
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to understand the influence of clearances in the kinematic joints, dimensional and geometrical tolerances associated with the parts, on the performance of a circuit breaker mechanism in the trip operation. Operating mechanism and trip unit are the essential components of a miniature circuit breaker. The operating and trip mechanisms are made of ten parts with revolute and cylindrical joints with clearance, and five unilateral contacts with friction. This mechanism is based on quick-make and quick-break principle. The Moreau-Jean nonsmooth contact dynamics (NSCD) numerical method is used to perform the simulations. The numerical results are validated by careful comparisons with experimental data.

Keywords

Joint clearance geometrical tolerances unilateral constraints Coulomb’s friction impacts circuit breaker 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ISO-1101: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Geometrical tolerancing – Tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out. International Organization for Standardization (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO-5458: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Geometrical tolerancing – Positional tolerancing. International Organization for Standardization (2018)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISO-5459: Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS) – Geometrical tolerancing – Datums and datum systems. International Organization for Standardization (2018)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abadie, M.: Dynamic simulation of rigid bodies: Modelling of frictional contact. In: B. Brogliato (ed.) Impacts in Mechanical Systems: Analysis and Modelling, Lecture Notes in Physics (LNP), vol. 551, pp. 61–144. Springer (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Acary, V.: Projected event-capturing time-stepping schemes for nonsmooth mechanical systems with unilateral contact and Coulomb’s friction. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 256, 224–250 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Acary, V., Brogliato, B.: Numerical Methods for Nonsmooth Dynamical Systems. Applications in Mechanics and Electronics. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics 35. Berlin: Springer. xxi, 525 p. (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Acary, V., Cadoux, F., Lemarechal, C., Malick, J.: A formulation of the linear discrete Coulomb friction problem via convex optimization. ZAMM-Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics/Zeitschrift f¨ur Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik 91(2), 155–175 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Akhadkar, N., Acary, V., Brogliato, B.: Analysis of collocated feedback controllers for four-bar planar mechanisms with joint clearances. Multibody System Dynamics 38(2), 101–136 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Akhadkar, N., Acary, V., Brogliato, B.: 3D revolute joint with clearance in multibody systems. In: Computational Kinematics, pp. 11–18. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akhadkar, N., Acary, V., Brogliato, B.: Multibody systems with 3D revolute joints with clearances: an industrial case study with an experimental validation. Multibody System Dynamics 42(3), 249–282 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brogliato, B.: Nonsmooth Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control, 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag, London (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Colosimo, B., Senin, N.: Geometric Tolerances. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Saxcé, G.: Une généralisation de l’inégalité de Fenchel et ses applications aux lois constitutives. C.R.A.S. Paris t 314,série II, 125–129 (1992)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Flores, P.: A parametric study on the dynamic response of planar multibody systems with multiple clearance joints. Nonlinear Dynamics 61(4), 633–653 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flores, P., R.Leine, Glocker, C.: Modeling and analysis of planar rigid multibody systems with translational clearance joints based on the non-smooth dynamics approach. Multibody System Dynamics 23, 165–190 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gauthier, L.: General principles and rules for technical drawing. Technical Note FT15 057Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gummer, A., Sauer, B.: Influence of contact geometry on local friction energy and stiffness of revolute joints. Journal of tribology 134(2), 021,402 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Haroun, A., Megahed, S.: Simulation and experimentation of multibody mechanical systems with clearance revolute joints. In: Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 63. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jean, M.: The non-smooth contact dynamics method. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 177(3), 235–257 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jean, M., Moreau, J.: Dynamics in the presence of unilateral contacts and dry friction: a numerical approach. In: G. del Piero, F. Maceri (eds.) Unilateral Problems in Structural Analysis II, no. 304 in CISM Courses and Lectures, pp. 151–196. Springer Verlag (1987)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krinner, A., Thümmel, T.: Non-smooth behaviour of a linkage mechanism with revolute clearance joints. In: New Advances in Mechanisms, Transmissions and Applications, pp. 233–241. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orden, J.G.: Analysis of joint clearances in multibody systems. Multibody System Dynamics 13(4), 401–420 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S.Yan, Xiang, W., Zhang, L.: A comprehensive model for 3d revolute joints with clearances in mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dynamics pp. 1–20 (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. Thümmel and K. Funk: Multibody modelling of linkage mechanisms including friction, clearance and impact. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms in Oulu, June 20 to 24, vol. 4, pp. 1387–1392. Oulu University Press, Finland (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Narendra Akhadkar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vincent Acary
    • 2
  • Bernard Brogliato
    • 2
  1. 1.Schneider ElectricMeylanFrance
  2. 2.Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, INRIA, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LJKGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations