Advertisement

Adaptive Backstepping Motion Control of a New Sitting-type Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot

  • J. K. Mohanta
  • S. MohanEmail author
  • Y. Takeda
  • B. Corves
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

This paper presents an adaptive backstepping motion control of a sitting- type lower limb rehabilitation robot (LLRR). The kinematics and dynamics of the proposed robot is discussed and its motion control design in the taskspace based on an adaptive backstepping control strategy is derived herein. The closed-loop system stability of the proposed motion control scheme is demonstrated by the Lyapunov’s direct method. Further performance analysis of the proposed system along with the proposed motion control design is demonstrated using computer based numerical simulations. For numerical simulations and to validate the effectiveness of the motion control strategy and the proposed lower limb rehabilitation robot design, the clinically obtained test gait data is used for the desired motion trajectory.

Keywords

Lower limb rehabilitation robot adaptive control design hybrid planar manipulator 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Diaz, I. and Gil, J.J. and S´anchez, E.: Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges, Journal of Robotics,2011, Article ID 759764 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnson, M.J. and Schmidt, H.: Robot assisted neurological rehabilitation at home: motivational aspects and concepts for tele-rehabilitation, Public Health Forum 17(4) 8e1–8e4 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akdoğan, E. and Adli, M.A.: The design and control of a therapeutic exercise robot for lower limb rehabilitation: Physiotherabot. Mechatronics,21(3), 509-522 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim,F.M, and Foong, R. and Yu, H.:A supine gait training device for stroke rehabilitation, Journal of Medical Devices 8 (2) (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bouri, M. and Le Gall, B. and Clavel, R.: A new concept of parallel robot for rehabilitation and fitness: The Lambda. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2503-2508 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mohanta, J.K. and Saxena, C. and Gupta, G. and Santhakumar, M.: Kinematic analysis of a passive sitting/lying type lower limb rehabilitation robot, in: Proc. of the 2nd international Conference on Machines and Mechanisms, Kanpur, India, 1–12 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohan, S. and Mohanta, J.K. and Kurtenbach, S. and Paris, J. and Corves, B. and Huesing, M.: Design, development and control of a 2PRP-2PPR planar parallel manipulator for lower limb rehabilitation therapies. Mech Mach Theory,112, 272–94 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohanta, J.K. and Mohan, S. and Deepasundar, P. and Kiruba-Shankar, R.: Development and control of a new sitting-type lower limb rehabilitation robot, Computers and Electrical Engineering, (2017), ISSN 0045-7906,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.09.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, C., Lan, B., Matsuura, D., Mougenot, C., Sugahara Y. and Takeda, Y.: Kinematic design of a footplate drive mechanism using a 3-DOF parallel mechanism for walking rehabilitation device, Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems, and Manufacturing, (2018)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Szigeti, Y. Takeda and D. Matsuura, Portable Design and Range of Motion Control for an Ankle Rehabilitation Mechanism Capable of Adjusting to Changes in Joint Axis, Recent Advances in Mechanism Design for Robotics, Mechanism and Machine Science 33, Springer, pp. 123- 132 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stansfield, B.W. and Hillman, S.J. and Hazlewood, M.E. and Robb, J.E.: Regression analysis of gait parameters with speed in normal children walking at self-selected speeds. Gait & Posture, 23, 288–294 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. K. Mohanta
    • 1
  • S. Mohan
    • 2
    Email author
  • Y. Takeda
    • 3
  • B. Corves
    • 4
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology KanpurKanpurIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology PalakkadPalakkadIndia
  3. 3.Tokyo Institute of TechnologyMeguro-kuJapan
  4. 4.RWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations