Advertisement

A plane strain problem solved by the isogeometric boundary element method

  • S. V. Camacho GutierrezEmail author
  • J. C. Jauregui Correa
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

The solution to engineering problems usually involves the use of computer engineering software. Generally, this type of software is based on the finite element method, which corresponds to a numerical method to solve the mechanical problems of continuum mechanics. However, in recent years an alternative approach called isogeometric analysis method has been developed, which consists of taking as a model of analysis the design developed in computer-aided engineering software. Also, this method has been implemented with the other numerical methods used for continuum mechanics. The present work shows the implementation of the isogeometric analysis in conjunction with the boundary element method to solve a plane strain problem. The results show that it is efficient and also, due to its nature of working on the border of the study body, this methodology uses fewer degrees of freedom.

Keywords

Isogeometric analysis boundary element method plane strain 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    T. J. R. Hughes, J. A. Cottrell, and Y. Bazilevs, “Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 194, no. 39–41, pp. 4135–4195, 2005.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Y. Bazilevs and T. J. R. Hughes, “NURBS-based isogeometric analysis for the computation of flows about rotating components,” Comput. Mech., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 143–150, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Beer, V. Mallardo, E. Ruocco, and C. Dünser, “Isogeometric Boundary Element Analysis of steady incompressible viscous flow, Part 1: Plane problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 326, pp. 51–69, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    I. Temizer, P. Wriggers, and T. J. R. Hughes, “Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 209–212, no. 9–12, pp. 115–128, 2012.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    L. De Lorenzis, P. Wriggers, and G. Zavarise, “A mortar formulation for 3D large deformation contact using NURBS-based isogeometric analysis and the augmented Lagrangian method,” Comput. Mech., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2012.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    R. Dimitri, L. De Lorenzis, M. A. Scott, P. Wriggers, R. L. Taylor, and G. Zavarise, “Isogeometric large deformation frictionless contact using Tsplines,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 269, pp. 394–414, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Seitz, P. Farah, J. Kremheller, B. I. Wohlmuth, W. A. Wall, and A. Popp, “Isogeometric dual mortar methods for computational contact mechanics,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 301, pp. 259–280, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. M. Neto, M. C. Oliveira, and L. F. Menezes, “Surface Smoothing Procedures in Computational Contact Mechanics,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 37–87, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Dittmann, M. Franke, I. Temizer, and C. Hesch, “Isogeometric Analysis and thermomechanical Mortar contact problems,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 274, pp. 192–212, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Z. An, T. Yu, T. Q. Bui, C. Wang, and N. A. Trinh, “Implementation of isogeometric boundary element method for 2-D steady heat transfer analysis,” Adv. Eng. Softw., vol. 116, no. November 2017, pp. 36–49, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. N. Simpson, Z. Liu, R. Vázquez, and J. A. Evans, “An isogeometric boundary element method for electromagnetic scattering with compatible Bspline discretizations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 362, pp. 264–289, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. A. Becker, The Boundary Element Method in Engineering, 1°. Cambridge, 1992.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. A. Cruse, “Mathematical foundations of the boundary-integral equation method in solid mechanics,” PRATT WHITNEY Aircr. Gr. EAST HARTFORD CONN., vol. No. PWA-55, 1977.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. N. Simpson, S. P. A. Bordas, J. Trevelyan, and T. Rabczuk, “A twodimensional Isogeometric Boundary Element Method for elastostatic analysis,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., vol. 209–212, pp. 87–100, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. N. Simpson, S. P. A. Bordas, H. Lian, and J. Trevelyan, “An isogeometric boundary element method for elastostatic analysis: 2D implementation aspects,” Comput. Struct., vol. 118, pp. 2–12, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. V. Camacho Gutierrez
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. C. Jauregui Correa
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad Autonoma de QueretaroQueretaroMexico

Personalised recommendations