Advertisement

Analysis of printing direction impact on dimensional accuracy of spur gears

  • Robert MašovićEmail author
  • Valentina Jagarčec
  • Daniel Miler
  • Zoran Domitran
  • Nenad Bojčetić
  • Dragan Žeželj
Conference paper
Part of the Mechanisms and Machine Science book series (Mechan. Machine Science, volume 73)

Abstract

In this article the authors analyzed the material deposition direction influence on the geometrical tolerances of spur gears. Gears were manufactured using the fused filament fabrication (FDM) process; one polyamide (PA) and two acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) gears were made. One of the ABS gears was manufactured in vertical and the other one in horizontal position, while the gear made of PA was manufactured in horizontal position. The deviations were determined using both the contact-type and optical measurement instruments. The results have shown the biggest deviations in tooth thickness and tooth space width among all gears. Additionally, comparison between contact-type and optical measurement method is presented. The best dimensional properties are achieved with gear made of ABS printed in horizontal position. Obtained data may serve as indicator regarding capabilities of 3D printing in spur gears production process.

Keywords

spur gears FDM printing direction dimensional accuracy ABS PA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1] I. Gibson, D. Rosen, and B. Stucker, Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Second Edi. Springer, 2015.Google Scholar
  2. [2] A. Boschetto and L. Bottini, “Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling,” Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 37, pp. 103–114, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] C. K. Chua, K. F. Leong, and C. S. Lim, “Rapid Prototyping.” WORLD SCIENTIFIC, Jan-2014.Google Scholar
  4. [4] A. Gebhardt and J.-S. Hötter, Additive Manufacturing. München: Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG, 2016.Google Scholar
  5. [5] A. Boschetto and L. Bottini, “Accuracy prediction in fused deposition modeling,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 73, no. 5–8, pp. 913–928, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6] L. M. Galantucci, F. Lavecchia, and G. Percoco, “Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts,” CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 189–192, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] T. M. Wang, J. T. Xi, and Y. Jin, “A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 33, no. 11–12, pp. 1087–1096, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] R. Anitha, S. Arunachalam, and P. Radhakrishnan, “Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 118, no. 1–3, pp. 385–388, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] K. Thrimurthulu, P. M. Pandey, and N. V. Reddy, “Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling,” Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 585–594, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] A. K. Sood, R. K. Ohdar, and S. S. Mahapatra, “Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method,” Mater. Des., vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 4243–4252, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] D. Ahn, J. H. Kweon, S. Kwon, J. Song, and S. Lee, “Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 209, no. 15–16, pp. 5593–5600, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] M. K. Kim, I. H. Lee, and H. C. Kim, “Effect of fabrication parameters on surface roughness of FDM parts,” Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 137–142, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] D. Y. Chang and B. H. Huang, “Studies on profile error and extruding aperture for the RP parts using the fused deposition modeling process,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 53, no. 9–12, pp. 1027–1037, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] M. Mahesh, Y. S. Wong, J. Y. H. Fuh, and H. T. Loh, “Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes,” Rapid Prototyp. J., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 123–135, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] ISO, “ISO 1328-1 Cylindrical gears — ISO system of flank tolerance classification,” 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Mašović
    • 1
    Email author
  • Valentina Jagarčec
    • 1
  • Daniel Miler
    • 1
  • Zoran Domitran
    • 1
  • Nenad Bojčetić
    • 1
  • Dragan Žeželj
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations