This work studies the influence of different geometrical configurations, which modify the mesh phasing and planet spacing of a planetary gear set, and its impact on the load sharing and transmission error in a three-planet planetary gear set. Geometry affects the performance of the gear set and therefore it has its influence in the behaviour of the transmission such as load sharing and transmission error, which are the focus of this work. At the same time, it is important to study the influence of different loads and therefore the incidence of the flexibility of the different elements that are part of the transmission.
meshing phase load sharing transmission error non-floating sun planetary transmission power level
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors would like to acknowledge Project DPI2017-85390-P funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry, and Competitiveness for supporting this
H. Ligata, A. Kahraman, and A. Singh. A Closed-Form Planet Load Sharing Formulation for Planetary Gear Sets Using a Translational Analogy. Journal of Mechanical Design, 131(2):021007, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. Singh. Load sharing behavior in epicyclic gears: Physical explanation and generalized formulation. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 45(3):511–530, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. Bodas and A. Kahraman. Influence of Carrier and Gear Manufacturing Errors on the Static Load Sharing Behavior of Planetary Gear Sets. JSME International Journal Series C, 47(3):908–915, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Y. Zhao, M. Ahmat, and K. Bari. Nonlinear dynamics modeling and analysis of transmission error of wind turbine planetary gear system. 228(1230):438–448, 2014.Google Scholar
X. Zhang and X. Tang. Analysis of transmission error and load distribution of a hoist two-stage planetary gear system. 0(0):1–14, 2018.Google Scholar
M. Iglesias, A. Fernandez del Rincon, A. De-Juan, P. Garcia, A. Diez-Ibarbia, and F. Viadero. Planetary transmission load sharing: Manufacturing errors and system configuration study. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 111:21–38, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
X. Gu and P. Velex. A dynamic model to study the influence of planet position errors in planetary gears. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 331(20):4554–4574, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D. Peng, W. A. Smith, R. B. Randall, and Z. Peng. Use of mesh phasing to locate faulty planet gears. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 116:12–24, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
A. Fernandez Rincon, F. Viadero, M. Iglesias, P. Garc´ıa, and R. Sancibrian. Amodel for the study of meshing stiffness in spur gear transmissions. MMT, 61:30–58, 2013.Google Scholar
M. Iglesias, A. Fernandez del Rincon, A. De-Juan, A. Diez-Ibarbia, P. Garcia, and F. Viadero. Advanced model for the calculation of meshing forces in spur gear planetary transmissions. Meccanica, 50(7):1869–1894, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
L. Vedmar and B. Henriksson. A General Approach for Determining Dynamic Forces in Spur Gears. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4):593, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M. Inalpolat and A. Kahraman. A theoretical and experimental investigation of modulation sidebands of planetary gear sets. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 323(3-5):677–696, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar