Advertisement

How to Create a Flourishing Classroom? An Intervention Protocol for Enhancing Teachers’ Social and Emotional Learning

  • Markus TalvioEmail author
  • Kirsti Lonka
Chapter

Abstract

The positive psychology movement values good atmosphere and flourishing in the classroom. In order to do this, it is important to develop teachers’ social and emotional learning (SEL) as a part of expertise, because teachers are in key position to create supportive and engaging learning environment. Even though promoting SEL as a means to create a flourishing classroom is often recommended in the literature, there is not much multi-national evidence about the development of the teachers’ competencies associated with SEL. Previous research indicates that it is difficult to aid students to flourish without teachers having the necessary skills to scaffold them. Focusing merely on cognitive outcomes is not helping, but instead, we need to train the teachers to support autonomy, agency and self-efficacy in classrooms to build sustainable success and happiness among youth. The whole classroom culture should be developed to support positive encounters. This chapter describes studies on SEL interventions on teachers. The participants of the first study were Finnish teachers who attended to Gordon’s Teacher Effectiveness Training (TET) workshops, based on humanistic psychology. For assessing teachers’ development of SEL, a new method, Dealing with Challenging Interaction (DCI) was developed. DCI helps to capture the real-life challenging situations at teacher’s work in various settings. In all, after the TET intervention the teachers really started using the studied skills, and they were more likely to support their students’ autonomy and agency than the teachers in the comparison groups. The next step was to carry out global investigations about the Lions Quest teacher workshops. These studies revealed increased readiness to develop teachers’ SEL competencies worldwide. Finally, various SEL interventions in nine European countries were looked at. So far, using mixed-method approach in several countries has produced consistent results with satisfactory effect sizes. The research methods appear ecologically valid, yet generalizable in various cultures and contexts. In all, these studies demonstrated that teachers benefit from SEL training. Diverse interventions appeared to increase teachers’ readiness to implement SEL. Especially, teachers’ sense of competence in teaching SEL increased. As such, the purpose of this chapter is to present an intervention protocol, based on the SEL interventions described above that aims at enhancing teachers’ social and emotional learning. The final aim is to develop classroom cultures that promote flourishing in both teachers and students. The present research adds to both theoretical and practical understanding of teachers’ continuing professional development worldwide.

Keywords

Social and emotional learning (SEL) Professional development Well-being Non-cognitive Intervention Continuing teacher training Mixed-method approach Classroom Dealing with challenging interaction (DCI) 

References

  1. Adams, L. (1989). Be your best. New York: The Putnam Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, L., Denslow, K. K., Emmons, S., Tyrrell, P., Miller, K., & Burch, N. (2006). Dr. Thomas Gordon’s teacher effectiveness training (T.E.T.). Instructor guide. Solana Beach, California: Gordon Training International.Google Scholar
  3. Allodi, M. W. (2010). The meaning of social climate of learning environments: Some reasons why we do not care enough about it. Learning Environments Research, 13(2), 89–104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9072-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teachers’ agency. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(6), 624–640.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brekelmans, M., Mainhard, T., den Brok, P., & Wubbels, T. (2011). Teacher control and affiliation: Do students and teachers agree? Journal of Classroom Interaction, 46(1), 17–26.Google Scholar
  7. Brophy-Herb, H. E., Lee, R. E., Nievar, M. A., & Stollak, G. (2007). Preschoolers’ social competence: Relations to family characteristics, teacher behaviors and classroom climate. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28(2), 134–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2006.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 678–707.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuijpers, P. (2002). Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs: A systematic review. Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and Prevention in the Community, 27(6), 1009–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00295-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. de Kock, A., Sleegers, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2005). New learning and choices of secondary school teachers when arranging learning environments. Teaching & Teacher Education, 21(7), 799–816.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3), 168–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, T. P., Frey, K. S., Greenberg, M. T., Haynes, N. M. … Shriver, T. P. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  17. Elliott, J. G., Stemler, S. E., Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Hoffman, N. (2011). The socially skilled teacher and the development of tacit knowledge. British Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920903420016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Emmer, E., Sabornie, E., Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2013). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships: Origins of communication, self, and culture. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey, L. R., Botan, C. H., Friedman, P. G., & Kreps, G. L. (1992). Interpreting communication research: A case study approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Gibbons, R. D., Hedeker, D. R., & Davis, J. M. (1993). Estimation of effect size from a series of experiments involving paired comparisons. Journal of Educational Statistics, 18, 271–279.  https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986018003271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gol-Guven, M. (2016). The Lions Quest Program in Turkey: Teachers’ views and classroom practices. International Journal of Emotional Education, 8(2), 60–69.Google Scholar
  24. Gol-Guven, M. (2017). The effectiveness of the Lions Quest Program: Skills for growing on school climate, students’ behaviors, perceptions of school, and conflict resolution skills. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(4), 575–594.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2016.1182311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gordon, T. (2003). Teacher effectiveness training. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
  26. Gordon, T., & Burch, N. (1974). TET, teacher effectiveness training. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  27. Grayson, J. L., & Alvarez, H. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(5), 1349–1363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guskey, R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers & Teaching, 8(3), 381–391.  https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hakkarainen, K., Palonen, T., Paavola, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Communities of networked expertise : Professional and educational perspectives. Advances in learning and instruction series; Sitra’s publication series; 257. Oxford: Elsevier. ISSN 0785-8388.Google Scholar
  30. Humphrey, N. (2013). Social and emotional learning: A critical appraisal. London: SAGE Publications Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ivey, A. E., Bradford-Ivey, M., & Zalaquett, C. P. (2009). Intentional interviewing and counselling: Facilitating client development in a multicultural society (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  32. Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 491–525.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ketonen, E., Talvio, M., & Lonka, K. (2014). Engaging Learning Environment (ELE) for leadership training: Fostering interest and epistemic change. In Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Advanced Education and Management (ICAEM2014) (pp. 104–111). Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  34. Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Lendrum, A., & Humphrey, N. (2012). The importance of studying the implementation of interventions in school settings. Oxford Review of Education, 38(5), 635–652.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.734800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leroy, N., Bressoux, P., Sarrazin, P., & Trouilloud, D. (2007). Impact of teachers’ implicit theories and perceived pressures on the establishment of an autonomy supportive climate. European Journal of Psychology of Education—EJPE (Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada), 22(4), 529–545.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lonka, K. (2018). Phenomenal learning from Finland. Keuruu: Edita.Google Scholar
  38. Lonka, K., & Ahola, K. (1995). Activating instruction: How to foster study and thinking skills in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(4), 351–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Matischek-Jauk, M., Krammer, G., & Reicher, H. (2018). The life-skills program Lions Questin Austrian schools: Implementation and outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  40. McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Latent class analysis. Beverly Hills: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. M. & Associates (Eds.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 1–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  42. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  43. Murtagh, L., & Baker, N. (2009). Feedback to Feed Forward: Student response to tutors’ written comments on assignments. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 3(1), 20–28.Google Scholar
  44. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2009). Categorical latent variable modeling using mplus: Cross-sectional data. Los Angeles, CA: Statmodel.Google Scholar
  45. Neill, A. S. (1960). Summerhill: A radical approach to child rearing. Summerhill: A radical approach to child rearing. Oxford, England: Hart.Google Scholar
  46. Patrick, H., Turner, J., Meyer, D., & Midgley, C. (2003). How teachers establish psychological environments during the first days of school: Associations with avoidance in mathematics. The Teachers College Record, 105(8), 1521–1558.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pulkkinen, L., & Kokko, K. (2017). Human development from middle childhood to middle adulthood: Growing up to be middle-aged. New York: Taylor and Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Pietarinen, J. (2010). Pupils’ pedagogical well-being in comprehensive school—Significant positive and negative school experiences of Finnish ninth graders. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(2), 207–221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-010-0013-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogers, K. (1970). On becoming a person: A therapeists’ view of psychotherapy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  50. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Salonen, P., Vauras, M., & Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction-what can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10(3), 199–208.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Seligman, M. E., Ernst, R. M., Gillham, J., Reivich, K., & Linkins, M. (2009). Positive education: Positive psychology and classroom interventions. Oxford review of education, 35(3), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Skinner, B. F. (2002). Beyond freedom and dignity (Reprinted ed.). Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company Inc.Google Scholar
  55. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Osterlind, S. J. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  56. Talvio, M. (2014). How do teachers benefit from training on social interaction skills? Developing and utilising an instrument for the evaluation of teachers’ social and emotional learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-51-0188-4.
  57. Talvio, M., Berg, M., Komulainen, E., & Lonka, K. (2016). Exploring the coherence of the goals achieved through a youth development programme. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 469–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Talvio, M., Hietajärvi, L., Matichek-Jauk, M. & Lonka, K. (2018). Do Lions Quest (LQ) workshops have systematic impact on teachers’ social and emotional learning (SEL)? Samples from nine different countries. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  59. Talvio, M., Ketonen, E., & Lonka, K. (2014). How long lasting are the effects of training on interaction skills? Teachers’ sample. In Proceedings of 2014 International Conference on Advanced Education and Management (ICAEM2014) (pp. 125–131). Beijing, China.Google Scholar
  60. Talvio, M., Lonka, K., Komulainen, E., Kuusela, M., & Lintunen, T. (2012). The development of the Dealing with Challenging Interaction (DCI) method to evaluate teachers’ social interaction skills. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 621–630.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Talvio, M., Lonka, K., Komulainen, E., Kuusela, M., & Lintunen, T. (2013). Revisiting Gordon’s teacher effectiveness training: An intervention study on teachers’ social and emotional learning. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(3), 693–716.  https://doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.31.13073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Talvio, M., Lonka, K., Komulainen, E., Kuusela, M., & Lintunen, T. (2015). The development of teachers’ responses to challenging situations during interaction training. Teacher Development, 19(1), 97–115.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.979298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences; 49 (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  65. Wenger, W. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.  https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1997). Paying attention to relationships. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 82.Google Scholar
  68. Zins, J. E., Payton, J. W., Weissberg, R. P., & O’Brien, M. U. (2007). Social and emotional learning and successful school performance. In G. Matthews, M. Zeidner, & R. D. Roberts (Eds.), The science of emotional intelligence: Knowns and unknowns (pp. 376–395). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Optentia Research Focus AreaVaal Triangle Campus, NWUVanderbijlparkSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations