Advertisement

Best-Practice Guidelines for Positive Psychological Intervention Research Design

  • Llewellyn Ellardus Van ZylEmail author
  • Emir Efendic
  • Sebastiaan RothmannSr.
  • Rebecca Shankland
Chapter

Abstract

Positive psychological interventions (PPIs) have been subjected to considerable criticism in recent years. Following similar movements across other domains of psychology, attempts to replicate classic PPI studies have failed or have produced mixed results. Such failures are often justified with arguments that invoke the complexity of human nature, the influence of contextual factors (for example, hidden moderators) that may arise in different populations, poor evaluation frameworks, or humans being reactive in PPIs and, as a result, modifying their behavior when observed. However, without replicability and consistency in results over time, the validity of PPIs will remain questionable in the broader scientific community unless acted on. In this chapter, it is argued that the lack of replicability and poor effectiveness of PPIs are a function of problems occurring in five areas: (a) intervention design, (b) recruitment and retention of participants, (c) adoption, (d) issues with intervention fidelity and implementation, and (e) efficacy or effectivity evaluation. This chapter focuses on the problems associated with each of these areas and presents general (albeit brief) best-practice guidelines for PPIs, inspired by recent developments in intervention methodology.

Keywords

Positive psychological interventions Intervention design Best practices Intervention guidelines 

References

  1. Agnoli, F., Wicherts, J. M., Veldkamp, C. L., Albiero, P., & Cubelli, R. (2017). Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists. PloS one, 12(3), e0172792.Google Scholar
  2. Antoine, P., Dauvier, B., Andreotti, E., & Congard, A. (2018). Individual differences in the effects of a positive psychology intervention: Applied psychology. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 140–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.024.Google Scholar
  3. Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J., Fiedler, K. … Perugini, M. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 108–119.Google Scholar
  4. Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 543–554.Google Scholar
  5. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273.Google Scholar
  6. Becker, G., & Newsom, E. (2003). Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction with health care among chronically ill African Americans. American Journal of Public Health, 93(5), 742–748.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Begun, A. L., Berger, L., & Otto-Salaj, L. L. (2018). Participant Recruitment and Retention in Intervention and Evaluation Research. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Biglan, A., Glasgow, R. E., & Singer, G. (1990). The need for a science of larger social units: A contextual approach. Behavior Therapy, 21(2), 195–215.Google Scholar
  9. Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G. J., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 119.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-119.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Borrelli, B., Sepinwall, D., Ernst, D., Bellg, A. J., Czajkowski, S., Breger, R., et al. (2005). A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 852.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradley, C. (1997). Psychological issues in clinical trial design. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 18(1), 67–87.Google Scholar
  12. Brauer, M., & Curtin, J. J. (2017). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods.  https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, N. J. L. (2017). An introduction to criticality for students of positive psychology. In The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Positive Psychology (pp. 173–192). Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, N. J. L., Sokal, A. D., & Friedman, H. L. (2014a). The persistence of wishful thinking. American Psychologist, 69, 629–632.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037050.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, N. J. L., Sokal, A. D., & Friedman, H. L. (2014b). Positive psychology and romantic scientism. American Psychologist, 69, 636–637.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brueton, V. C., Tierney, J. F., Stenning, S., Meredith, S., Harding, S., Nazareth, I., et al. (2014). Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal Open, 4(2), e003821.Google Scholar
  17. Caldwell, P. H., Hamilton, S., Tan, A., & Craig, J. C. (2010). Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(11), e1000368.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Carey, B. (2011). Fraud case seen as a red flag for psychology research. N. Y. Times. Available online at http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html.
  19. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed).Google Scholar
  20. Conner, K. O., Copeland, V. C., Grote, N. K., Koeske, G., Rosen, D., Reynolds, C. F., III, et al. (2010). Mental health treatment seeking among older adults with depression: The impact of stigma and race. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(6), 531–543.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  22. Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Bethesda (Maryland): National Institutes of Health, 2013, 541–545.Google Scholar
  23. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12(11), 671–684.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043943.Google Scholar
  24. Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  25. Curry, L., & Nunez-Smith, M. (2014). Mixed methods in health sciences research: A practical primer (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. de Salis, I., Tomlin, Z., Toerien, M., & Donovan, J. (2008). Qualitative research to improve RCT recruitment: Issues arising in establishing research collaborations. Contemporary clinical trials, 29(5), 663–670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dickersin, K., & Rennie, D. (2003). Registering clinical trials. Jama, 290(4), 516–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 621.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Eglmeier, W. (2015). Is social media suitable for patient recruitment? Clinical Investigation, 5(6), 573–583.Google Scholar
  31. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods, 41(4), 1149–1160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Feifer, C., Fifield, J., Ornstein, S., Karson, A. S., Bates, D. W., Jones, K. R., et al. (2004). From research to daily clinical practice: What are the challenges in “translation”? The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 30(5), 235–245.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo cult science. Engineering and Science, 37(7), 10–13.Google Scholar
  34. Fiedler, K., Harris, C., & Schott, M. (2018). Unwarranted inferences from statistical mediation tests—An analysis of articles published in 2015. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 75, 95–102.Google Scholar
  35. Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15(5), 451–474.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367.Google Scholar
  37. Freedland, K. E., Mohr, D. C., Davidson, K. W., & Schwartz, J. E. (2011). Usual and unusual care: Existing practice control groups in randomized controlled trials of behavioral interventions. Gastroenterology, 126, S159–S163.Google Scholar
  38. Friedman, H. L., & Brown, N. J. (2018). Implications of debunking the “critical positivity ratio” for humanistic psychology: Introduction to special issue. Journal of humanistic psychology, 58(3), 239–261.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Friedman, H. L., & Robbins, B. D. (2017). The unavoidable role of values in positive psychology: Reflections in light of psychology’s replicability crisis. In The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Positive Psychology (pp. 15–25). Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Gelinas, L., Pierce, R., Winkler, S., Cohen, I. G., Lynch, H. F., & Bierer, B. E. (2017). Using social media as a research recruitment tool: Ethical issues and recommendations. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(3), 3–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014). A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to minority research participation among African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders. American Journal of Public Health, 104(2), e16–e31.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Giarelli, E., Bruner, D. W., Nguyen, E., Basham, S., Marathe, P., Dao, D. … Nguyen, G. (2011). Research participation among Asian American women at risk for cervical cancer: Exploratory pilot of barriers and enhancers. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 13(6), 1055–1068.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Gitlin, L., & Czaja, S. (2015). Behavioral intervention research: Designing, evaluating, and implementing. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Glasgow, R. E., McKay, H. G., Piette, J. D., & Reynolds, K. D. (2001). The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient education and counseling, 44(2), 119–127.Google Scholar
  45. Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Glasgow, R. E., Magid, D. J., Beck, A., Ritzwoller, D., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2005). Practical clinical trials for translating research to practice: Design and measurement recommendations. Medical care, 43, 551–557.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: The process and practice of mindful change (2e ed.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  48. Huntington, C., Newton, J. T., Donaldson, N., Liossi, C., Reynolds, P. A., Alharatani, R., et al. (2017). Lessons learned on recruitment and retention in hard-to-reach families in a phase III randomised controlled trial of preparatory information for children undergoing general anaesthesia. BMC oral health, 17(1), 122.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Ivtzan, I., Lomas, T., Hefferon, K., & Worth, P. (2015). Second wave positive psychology: Embracing the dark side of life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Jimanez, E. D., & Czaja, J. S. (2016). Recruitment and retention: Two of the most important, yet challenging, tasks in behavioral intervention research. In Behavioral intervention research: Designing, evaluating, and implementing. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  52. John, L. K., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2012). Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science, 23(5), 524–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of Mindfulness meditation: Theoretical considerations preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4, 33–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Karras-Jean Gilles, J., Astuto, J., Gjicali, K., & Allen, L. (2017). Sample retention in an urban context: Exploring influential factors within a longitudinal randomized evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation. 1098214017742719.Google Scholar
  55. Kazdin, A. E. (1992). Research design in clinical psychology. Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  56. Kelley, K. (2007). Methods for the behavioral, educational, and social sciences (MBESS) [Computer software and manual]. Retrievable from www.cran.r-project.org.
  57. Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Simultaneous comparisons and the control of type I errors (pp. 111–130). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  58. Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Jr., Alper, S., … Nosek, B. A. (2018, November 21). Many labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across sample and setting.  https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9654g.
  59. La Vaque, T. J. L., Hammond, D. C., Trudeau, D., Monastra, V., Perry, J., Lehrer, P. … Sherman, R. (2002). Template for developing guidelines for the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of psychophysiological interventions. Journal of Neurotherapy, 6(4), 11–23.Google Scholar
  60. Lazic, S. E. (2018). Four simple ways to increase power without increasing the sample size. Laboratory Animals 0023677218767478.Google Scholar
  61. Leisen-Pollack, B., & Alexandrov, A. (2013). Nomological validity of the Net Promoter Index question. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(2), 118–129.Google Scholar
  62. Lenth, R. V. (2001). Some practical guidelines for effective sample size determination. The American Statistician, 55(3), 187–193.Google Scholar
  63. Lloyd, A., White, R., Eames, C., & Crane, R. (2018). The utility of home-practice in mindfulness-based group interventions: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 9(3), 673–692.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0813-z.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Loerinc, A. G., Meuret, A. E., Twohig, M. P., Rosenfield, D., Bluett, E. J., & Craske, M. G. (2015). Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: Need for standardized criteria. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 72–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.08.004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Love, M. M., Pearce, K. A., Williamson, M. A., Barron, M. A., & Shelton, B. J. (2006). Patients, practices, and relationships: Challenges and lessons learned from the Kentucky Ambulatory Network (KAN) CaRESS clinical trial. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 19(1), 75–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Mauss, I. B., Tamir, M., Anderson, C. L., & Savino, N. S. (2011). Can seeking happiness make people happy? Paradoxical effects of valuing happiness. Emotion, 11(4), 807–815.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Mohr, D. C., Spring, B., Freedland, K. E., Beckner, V., Arean, P., Hollon, S. D. … Kaplan, R. (2009). The selection and design of control conditions for randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78(5), 275–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Mongrain, M., & Anselmo-Matthews, T. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al. (2005). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Moras, K. (1998). Internal and external validity of intervention studies. In A. S. Bellack & M. Hersen (Eds.), Comprehensive clinical psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 201–224). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  70. Murillo, H., Reece, E. A., Snyderman, R., & Sung, N. S. (2006). Meeting the challenges facing clinical research: Solutions proposed by leaders of medical specialty and clinical research societies. Academic Medicine, 81, 107–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Daniel, L. G. (2003). Typology of analytical and interpretational errors in quantitative and qualitative educational research. Current Issues in Education, 6(2).Google Scholar
  72. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.Google Scholar
  73. Parks, A. C., & Layous, K. (2015). Positive psychological interventions. APA handbook of clinical psychology, 3, 438–449.Google Scholar
  74. Parks, A. C., & Schueller, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Wiley Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions. NY, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  75. Pashler, H., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Editors’ introduction to the special section on replicability in psychological science: A crisis of confidence? Perspective in Psychological Science, 7, 528–530.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253.Google Scholar
  76. Planas, L. G. (2008). Intervention design, implementation, and evaluation. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 65(19), 1854–1863.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Prescott, R. J., Counsell, C. E., Gillespie, W. J., Grant, A. M., Russell, I. T., Kiauka, S., et al. (1999). Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomized controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment, 3(20), 1–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Ramo, D. E., & Prochaska, J. J. (2012). Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(1), e28.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1878.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Rebok, W.G. (2016) Selecting control groups: To what should we compare behavioral interventions? In Behavioral Intervention research: Designing, Evaluating, and Implementing. Springer, NY.Google Scholar
  80. Richter, M. (2016). Residual tests in the analysis of planned contrasts: Problems and solutions. Psychological Methods, 21(1), 112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  82. Schisterman, E. F., Cole, S. R., & Platt, R. W. (2009). Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 20(4), 488–498.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  83. Schooler, J. W., Ariely, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). The pursuit and assessment of happiness may be self-defeating. In J. Carrillo & I. Brocas (Eds.), The psychology of economic decisions (pp. 41–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Schueller, S. M. (2014). Person-activity fit in positive psychological interventions. In A. C. Parks & S. M. Schueller (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of positive psychological interventions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  85. Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction (Vol. 55, No. 1, p. 5). American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  86. Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410–425.Google Scholar
  87. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Sin, N. L., Della Porta, M. D., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2011). Tailoring positive psychology interventions to treat depressed individuals. In S. I. Donaldson, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (Eds.), Applied positive psychology: Improving everyday life, health, schools, work, and society (pp. 79–96). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Sin, N. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: A practice-friendly meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 467–487.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Spilker, B., & Cramer, J. A. (1992). Patient recruitment in clinical trials (pp. 83–86). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  91. Taylor, C. T., Knapp, S. E., Bomyea, J. A., Ramsawh, H. J., Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2017). What good are positive emotions for treatment? Trait positive emotionality predicts response to cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 93, 6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2017.03.006.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. Tunis, S. R., Stryer, D. B., & Clancy, C. M. (2003). Practical clinical trials: Increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA, 290(12), 1624–1632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Vallerand, R. J. (1989). Vers une méthodologie de validation transculturelle de questionnaires psychologiques: Implications pour la recherche en langue française. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 30, 662–680.Google Scholar
  94. van Zyl, L. E., Motschnig-Pitrik, R., & Stander, M. W. (2016). Exploring positive psychology and person-centred psychology in multi-cultural coaching. Coaching psychology: Meta-theoretical perspectives and applications in multicultural contexts (pp. 315–355). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  95. van Zyl, L. E., Rothmann, S. (2012). Beyond smiling: The evaluation of a positive psychological intervention aimed at student happiness. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 22(3):369–384. http://goo.gl/ZLpLrY.Google Scholar
  96. van Zyl, L. E., & Rothmann, S. (2014). Towards happiness interventions: Construct clarification and intervention methodologies. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 24(2), 327–341.Google Scholar
  97. van’t Veer, A. E., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2016). Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 2–12.Google Scholar
  98. Wagenmakers, E. J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J. … Matzke, D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review25(1), 35–57.Google Scholar
  99. Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Wainberg, M. L., & Cournos, F. (2000). Adherence to treatment. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 2000(87), 85–93.Google Scholar
  101. Westfall, J., Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Replicating studies in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 390–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Weytens, F., Luminet, O., Verhofstadt, L., & Mikolajczak, M. (2014). An integrative theory-driven positive emotion regulation intervention. PLoS ONE, 9, e95677.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Whitehead, W. E. (2004). Control groups appropriate for behavioral interventions. Psychosomatic Medicine, 73, 323–335.Google Scholar
  104. Wong, P. T., Reker, G. T., & Peacock, E. J. (2006). A resource-congruence model of coping and the development of the coping schemas inventory. Handbook of multicultural perspectives on stress and coping (pp. 223–283). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
  105. Wong, P. T. P., & Roy, S. (2017). Critique of positive psychology and positive interventions. In N. J. L. Brown, T. Lomas, & F. J. Eiroa-Orosa (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of critical positive psychology. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  106. Zweben, A., Fucito, L. M., & O’Malley, S. S. (2009). Effective strategies for maintaining research participation in clinical trials. Drug Information Journal, 43(4), 459–467.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Llewellyn Ellardus Van Zyl
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Emir Efendic
    • 3
  • Sebastiaan RothmannSr.
    • 1
  • Rebecca Shankland
    • 4
  1. 1.Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University (VTC)VanderbijlparkSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Psychological Sciences Research Institute, University of LouvainLeuvenBelgium
  4. 4.University Grenoble AlpesGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations