Advertisement

Life on Earth and Beyond: Producing the Wildlife Blockbuster

  • Jean-Baptiste GouyonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Science and Popular Culture book series (PSSPC)

Abstract

Life on Earth was a milestone in the production of wildlife television. It opened a new epoch, characterised by the production of large-scale, ambitious series which rested on the creation of a new public figure for wildlife television: the telenaturalist, as embodied in David Attenborough. In turn, the appearance of this new figure rendered the MOD necessary, for it established the claim that the telenaturalist could be trusted to produce objective knowledge of nature in front of the camera for the benefit of the watching public. The model instituted with Life on Earth was perfected with the next two series, The Living Planet (1979) and The Trials of Life (1990).

References

  1. Barnes, B. (1978). Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Boon, T. (2017). ‘Programmes of real cultural significance’: BBC2, the sciences and the arts in the mid-1960s. Journal of British Cinema and Television, 14(3), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bousé, D. (2000). Wildlife films. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgess, J., & Unwin, D. (1984). Exploring the living planet with David Attenborough. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 8(2), 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Callon, M. (1986). Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: la domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc. L’Année Sociologique, 36, 169–208.Google Scholar
  6. Caro, T. M. (1998). Behavioural ecology and conservation biology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cottle, S. (2004). Producing nature(s): On the changing production ecology of natural history TV. Media, Culture and Society, 26(1), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gouyon, J.-B. (2011). From Kearton to Attenborough: Fashioning the telenaturalist’s identity. History of Science, 49(1), 25–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gouyon, J.-B. (2016). ‘You can’t make a film about mice just by going out into a meadow and looking at mice’: Staging as knowledge production in Natural History Film-making. In M. Willis (Ed.), Staging science (pp. 83–103). London: Palgrave Pivot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimaud, E. (2006). Têtes multiples et jeux d’optique: Ou l’art de truquer les dieux hindous. Terrain, 46, 85–106.Google Scholar
  11. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Monod, J. (1970). Le Hasard et la Nécessité. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  13. Morus, I. R. (2006). Seeing and believing science. Isis, 97(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Outram, D. (1996). New spaces in natural history. In N. Jardine et al. (Eds.), Cultures of natural history (pp. 249–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Parsons, C. (1971). Making wildlife movies, an introduction. Newton Abbot: David & Charles Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Parsons, C. (1982). True to nature. Cambridge: Patrick Stephens.Google Scholar
  17. Richards, M. (2013). Global nature, global brand: BBC Earth and David Attenborough’s landmark wildlife series. Media International Australia, 146(1), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shapin, S. (2010). Never pure: Historical studies of science as if it was produced by people with bodies, situated in time, space, culture, and society, and struggling for credibility and authority. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Tudor, A. (1981). The Panels. In T. Bennet et al. (Eds.), Popular television and film (pp. 150–158). London: BFI, The Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science and Technology StudiesUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations