Advertisement

Biological Control of Soft-Rot of Ginger: Current Trends and Future Prospects

  • Mahendra RaiEmail author
  • Patrycja Golińska
  • Sudhir Shende
  • Priti Paralikar
  • Pramod Ingle
  • Avinash P. Ingle
Chapter

Abstract

Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) is an important crop having various medicinal, nutritional, and ethnomedicinal properties cultivated all over the world. Pythium and Fusarium spp. are pathogens responsible for the deteriorating disease in ginger known as soft- or rhizome-rot, causing more than 50% loss of ginger crop worldwide. The application of chemical fungicides is a promising method for control of soft-rot in ginger. But use of such fungicides is harmful to both environment and human health. Thus, there is an obligatory need for the search of an eco-friendly and economic approach for the control of soft-rot in ginger. Various physical, chemical, and biological methods have already been in practice since many years for managing soft-rot in ginger. This chapter primarily focuses on the advantages of biological control over chemical methods of Pythium and Fusarium spp. management using antagonistic fungi, bacteria, actinomycetes, and plant extracts. These biocontrol agents offer the best opportunity in control of diseases and also help to maintain the quality and crop yield. Moreover, the emerging role of nanotechnology in the management of these pathogens is also briefly discussed.

Keywords

Pythium Fusarium Biocontrol Soft-rot Ginger Antagonistic 

Notes

Acknowledgement

MR is thankful to University Grants Commission, New Delhi for award of BSR faculty fellowship.

References

  1. Abbasi PA, Riga E, Conn KL, Lazarovits G (2005) Effect of neem cake soil amendment on reduction of damping-off severity and population densities of plant-parasitic nematodes and soil borne plant pathogens. Can J Plant Pathol 27:38e45Google Scholar
  2. Abd-Elsalam KA, Prasad R (2018) Nanobiotechnology applications in plant protection. Springer, Cham, (ISBN 978-3-319-91161-8)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrios GN (2005) Plant pathology, 5th edn. Elsevier\Academic, Burlington, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmed IS, Lee YS (2015) Nanoparticles as alternative pesticides: concept manufacturing and activities. Kor J Mycol 43:207–215Google Scholar
  5. Al-Ani RA, Adhab MA, Mahdi MH, Abood HM (2012) Rhizobium japonicum as a biocontrol agent of soybean root rot disease caused by Fusarium solani and Macrophomina phaseolina. Plant Protect Sci 48:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al-Mughrabi KI (2003) Antimicrobial activity of extracts from leaves, stems and flowers of Euphorbia macroclada against plant pathogenic fungi. Phytopathol Mediterr 42:245–250Google Scholar
  7. Ambikapathy V, Gomathi S, Panneerselva MA (2011) Effect of antifungal activity of some medicinal plants against Pythium debaryanum (Hesse). Asian J Plant Sci Res 1(3):131–134Google Scholar
  8. Anisha C, Radhakrishnan EK (2015) Gliotoxin-producing endophytic Acremonium sp. from Zingiber officinale found antagonistic to soft-rot pathogen Pythium myriotylum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 175:3458–3467Google Scholar
  9. Ashwini N, Srividya S (2012) Optimization of chitinase produced by a biocontrol strain of B. subtilis using Plackett-Burman design. Eur J Exp Biol 2:861–865Google Scholar
  10. Bahraminejad S (2012) In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of Iranian plant species against Pythium aphanidermatum. Ann Biol Res 3:2134–2145Google Scholar
  11. Banker S, Volova T, Prudnikova SV, Satish S, Prasad N (2017) Nanoagroparticles emerging trends and future prospect in modern agriculture system. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 53:10–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bardin SD, Huang HC, Pinto J, Amundsen EJ, Erickson RS (2004) Biological control of Pythium damping-off of pea and sugar beet by Rhizobium leguminosarum bv Viceae. Can J Bot 82:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35(4 Suppl):1044–1051PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Bennett MA, Callan NW, Fritz VA (1991) Seed treatments for disease control. Hortic Technol 1:84–87Google Scholar
  15. Bertus LS (1942) Plant pathology. Administration report, Directorate of Agriculture, Ceylon, 1941, p. 5Google Scholar
  16. Bhai RS, Kishore VK, Kumar A, Anandaraj M, Eapen SJ (2005) Screening of rhizobacterial isolates against soft-rot disease of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc). J Spices Aromat Crops 14:130–136Google Scholar
  17. Bhardwaj SS, Gupta PK, Dohroo NP, Shyam KR (1988) Biological control of rhizome rot of ginger in storage. Ind J Plant Pathol 6:56–58Google Scholar
  18. Bhattacharyya A, Duraisamy P, Govindarajan M, Buhroo AA, Prasad R (2016) Nano-biofungicides: emerging trend in insect pest control. In: Prasad R (ed) Advances and applications through fungal nanobiotechnology. Springer, Cham, pp 307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brahmanwade K, Shende S, Bonde S, Gade A, Rai M (2016) Fungicidal activity of cu nanoparticles against Fusarium causing crop disease. Environ Chem Lett 14:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Butler EJ (1907) An account of the genus Pythium and some Chytridiaceae. Memoirs of the Department of Agriculture, India. Bot Ser 1:1–162Google Scholar
  21. Callan NW, Mathre DE, Miller JB (1991) Field performance of sweet corn seed bio-primed and coated with Pseudomonas fluorescens AB254. Hotrscience 26(9):1163–1165Google Scholar
  22. Chairat Y, Pasura A (2013) Isolation and identification of rhizobacteria having inhibitory capability on pathogenic fungi, Pythium sp. J Sci Technol Human 11:117–127Google Scholar
  23. Chakraborty P, Adikary J, Chatterjee S, Biswas B, Chattopadhyay T (2016) Facile synthesis of copper nanoparticles antibacterial and antifungal activity study. Rasayan J Chem 9:77–83Google Scholar
  24. Chase AR, Brunk DD, Tepper BL (1985) Fosetyl aluminum fungicide for controlling Pythium root rot of foliage plants. Proc Florida State Hortic Soc 95:119–122Google Scholar
  25. Chérif M, Menzies JG, Ehret DL, Bogdanoff C (1994) Yield of cucumber infected with Pythium aphanidermatum when grown with soluble silicon. Hortic Sci 29:896–897Google Scholar
  26. Chin-A-Woeng TF, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJ (2003) Phenazines and their role in biocontrol by Pseudomonas bacteria. New Phytol 157:503–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dake GN (1995) Diseases of ginger (Zingiber officinale rose) and their management. J Spices Aromat Crops 4:40–48Google Scholar
  28. Dake GN, Edison S (1989) Association of pathogen with rhizome rot of ginger in Kerala. Indian Phytopath 42:116–119Google Scholar
  29. Das S, Biswapati M, Maity D, Raj SK (2002) Different techniques of seed treatment in the management of seedling disease of sugar beet. J Mycopathol Res 40:175–178Google Scholar
  30. Deshpande AS, Rhomane RB, Vaidya BK, JoshiRM HAS, Kulkarni BD (2008) Sulphur nanoparticles synthesis and characterization from H2S gas using novel biodegradable iron chelates in W/O micro emulsion. Nanoscale Res Lett 3:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dhanik J, Arya N, Nand V (2017) A review on Zingiber officinale. J Pharmacogn Phytother 6:174–184Google Scholar
  32. Dohroo NP (1987) Pythium ultimum on ginger. Indian Phytopath 40:275Google Scholar
  33. Dohroo NP (2005) Diseases of ginger. In: Ravindran PN, Babu KN (eds) Ginger, the genus Zingiber. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 305–340Google Scholar
  34. Dohroo NP, Gupta M (2014) Effect of bioagents on management of rhizome diseases, plant growth parameters and nematode population in ginger. Agric Sci Digest 34:41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dohroo NP, Sharma SL (1986) Evaluation of fungicides for the control of rhizome rot of ginger in storage. Indian Phytopath 36:691–693Google Scholar
  36. Dohroo NP, Sharma SL, Bhardwaj SS (1984) Efficacy of soil applied fungitoxicants against rhizome rot of ginger. Indian J Plant Prot 12:59–60Google Scholar
  37. Dohroo NP, Kansal S, Mehta P, Ahluwalia N (2012) Evaluation of eco-friendly disease management practices against soft-rot of ginger caused by Pythium aphanidermatum. Plant Dis Res 27:1e5Google Scholar
  38. Dohroo NP, Kansal S, Ahluwalia N (2015) Studies on eco-farmer-friendly practices for management of soft-rot of ginger (Zingiber officinale). Indian Phytopathol 68:93–96Google Scholar
  39. Doshi A, Mathur S (1987) Symptomatology, interaction and management of rhizome rot of ginger. Xenobiotics 26:261–265Google Scholar
  40. Drojee SL (1986) Studies on rhizome rot of ginger in Udaipur. M.Sc. thesis, Sukhadia University, Udaipur, p 98Google Scholar
  41. El-Argawy E, Rahhal M, El-Korany K, Elshabrawy E, Eitahan R (2017) Efficacy of some nanoparticles to control dampping off and root rot of sugar beet in El-Behiera. Asian J Plant Pathol 11:35–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. El-Katatny MH, Gudelj M, Robra KH, Elnaghy MA, Gubitz GM (2001) Characterization of a chitinase and an endo-b-1,3- glucanase from Trichoderma harzianum Rifai T24 involved in control of the phytopathogen Sclerotium rolfsii. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56:137–143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. El-Tarabily KA (2006) Rhizosphere-competent isolates of streptomycete and non-streptomycete actinomycetes capable of producing cell-wall degrading enzymes to control Pythium aphanidermatum damping-off disease of cucumber. Can J Bot 84:211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. El-Tarabily KA, St J, Hardy GE, Sivasithamparam K, Hussein AM, Kurtböke DI (1997) The potential for the biological control of cavity-spot disease of carrots, caused by Pythium coloratum, by streptomycete and non-streptomycete actinomycetes. New Phytol 137:495–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fenice M, Gooday GW (2006) Mycoparasitic actions against fungi and oomycetes by a strain (CCFEE 5003) of the fungus Lecanicillium muscarium isolated in Continental Antarctica. Ann Microbiol 56(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Fira D, Dimkić I, Berić T, Lozo J, Stanković S (2018) Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species. J Biotechnol 285:44–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fraceto LF, Grillo R, de Medeiros GA, Scognamiglio V (2016) Nanotechnology in agriculture: which innovation potential does it have? Front Environ Sci 4:20.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs2016000204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Fravel DR (2005) Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:337–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Fróes A, Macrae A, Rosa J, Franco M, Souza R, Soares R, Coelho R (2012) Selection of a Streptomyces strain able to produce cell wall degrading enzymes and active against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J Microbiol 50:798–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Gajera H, Domadiya R, Patel S, Kapopara M, Golakiya B (2013) Molecular mechanism of Trichoderma as bio-control agents against phytopathogen system – a review. Curr Res Microbiol Biotechnol 1:133–142Google Scholar
  51. Gautam J, Mainali RP (2016) Management of ginger rhizome fly (Calobata sp) and associated rhizome rot (Pythium sp.). World J Agric Res 4:128–131Google Scholar
  52. Gholve VM, Tatikundalwar VR, Suryawanshi AP, Dey U (2016) Effect of fungicides, plant extracts/botanicals and bioagents against damping off in brinjal. Afr J Microbiol Res 8:2835–2848Google Scholar
  53. Gogos A, Knauer K, Bucheli TD (2012) Nanomaterials in plant protection and fertilization: current state foreseen applications and research priorities. J Agric Food Chem 60:9781–9792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Gupta M, Kaushal M (2017) Diseases infecting ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe): a review. Agric Rev 38(1):15–28.  https://doi.org/10.18805/ag.v0iOF.7305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Gupta SL, Paijwar MS, Rizvi G (2013) Biological management of rot disease of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc). Trends Biosci 6:302Google Scholar
  56. Gupta N, Upadhyaya CP, Singh A, Abd-Elsalam KA, Prasad R (2018) Applications of silver nanoparticles in plant protection. In: Abd-Elsalam K, Prasad R (eds) Nanobiotechnology applications in plant protection. Springer, Cham, pp 247–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hagedorn C, Nelson N, Skwara JE (1990) Evaluation of a Pseudomonas fluorescens strain for repression of seedling disease. Virginia J Sci 41(4B):492–500Google Scholar
  58. Harman GE (2006) Overview of mechanisms and uses of Trichoderma spp. Phytopathology 96:190–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Haware MP, Joshi LK (1974) Studies on soft-rot of ginger from Madhya Pradesh. Indian Phytopathology 27:158–161Google Scholar
  60. Heydari A, Pessarakli M (2010) A review on biological control of fungal plant pathogens using microbial antagonists. J Biol Sci 10:273–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hoppe PE (1966) Pythium species still viable after 12 years in air-dried muck soil. Phytopathology 56:1411Google Scholar
  62. Howell CR, Stipanovic RD (1983) Gliovirin, a new antibiotic from Gliocladium virens and its role in the biological control of Pythium ultimum. Canadian J Micro 29:321–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Howie WJ, Suslow TV (1991) Role of antibiotic biosynthesis in the inhibition of Pythium ultimum in the cotton spermosphere and rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Mol Plant Microb Interact 4:393–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hudge BV (2015) Management of damping-off disease of soybean caused by Pythium ultimum Trow. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 4:799–808Google Scholar
  65. Hwang SF, Gossen BD, Chang KF, Turnbull GD, Howard RJ (2001) Effect of seed damage and metalaxyl seed treatment on Pythium seedling blight and seed yield of field pea. Can J Plant Sci 81:509–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ismail M, Prasad R, Ibrahim AIM, Ahmed ISA (2017) Modern prospects of nanotechnology in plant pathology. In: Prasad R, Kumar M, Kumar V (eds) Nanotechnology. Springer, Singapore, pp 305–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Jayaraj J, Radhakrishnan NV, Velazhahan R (2006) Development of formulations of Trichoderma harzianum strain M1 for control of damping-off of tomato caused by Pythium aphanidermatum. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot 39:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jo YK, Kim BH, Jung G (2009) Antifungal activity of silver ions and nanoparticles on phytopathogenic fungi. Plant Dis 93:1037–1043PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Kanhed P, Birla S, Gaikwad S, Gade A, Seabra AB, Rubilar O, Duran N, Rai M (2014) In vitro antifungal efficacy of copper nanoparticles against selected crop pathogenic fungi. Mater Lett 15:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kasprowicz MJ, Kozioł M, Gorczyca A (2010) The effect of silver nanoparticles on phytopathogenic spores of Fusarium culmorum. Can J Microbiol 56:247–253PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Kavita PG, Thomas G (2008) Population genetic structure of the clonal plant Zingiber zerumbet (L) smith (Zingiberaceae) a wild relative of cultivated ginger and its response to Pythium aphanidermatum. Euphytica 160:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Khatso K, Tiameren Ao N (2013) Biocontrol of rhizome rot disease of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Int J Bio-Resour Stress Manag 4:317–321Google Scholar
  73. Kim JS, Kwon CS, Son KH (2000) Inhibition of α-glucosidase and amylase by luteolin, a flavonoid. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 64:2458–2461PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Kipngeno P, Losenge T, Maina N, Kahangi E, Juma P (2015) Efficacy of Bacillus subtilis and Trichoderma asperellum against Pythium aphanidermatum in tomatoes. Biol Control 90:92–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Krishnaraj C, Ramachandran R, Mohan K, Kalaichelvan PT (2012) Optimization for rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles and its effect on phytopathogenic fungi. Spectrochim Acta A 93:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Kulkarni S, Hegde YR (2002) Diseases of plantation crops and their management. Agrotech Publishing Academy, Udaipur, p 131Google Scholar
  77. Le DP, Smith M, Hudler GW, Aitken E (2014) Pythium soft-rot of ginger: detection and identification of the causal pathogens and their control. Crop Prot 65:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Le DP, Smith MK, Aitken E (2016) An assessment of Pythium spp. associated with soft-rot disease of ginger (Zingiber officinale) in Queensland Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 45:377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lee WH, Cheong SS, So IY (1990) Properties of suppressive and conducive soils to ginger rhizome rot. Kor J Plant Pathol 6:338–342Google Scholar
  80. Lin LT, Chang SS, Leu LS (1971) Soft-rot of ginger. Plant Protect Bull Taiwan 13:54–67Google Scholar
  81. Llorens E, Agustí-Brisach C, González-Hernández AI, Troncho P, Vicedo B, Yuste T, Orero M, Ledó C, García-Agustín P, Lapeña L (2017) Bioassimilable sulphur provides effective control of Oidium neolycopersici in tomato enhancing the plant immune system. Pest Manag Sci 73(5):1017–1023PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Loliam B, Morinaga T, Chaiyanan S (2013) Biocontrol of Pythium aphanidermatum by the cellulolytic actinomycetes Streptomyces rubrolavendulae S4. Sci Asia 39:584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lumsden RD, Locke JC (1989) Biological control of damping-off caused by Pythium ultimum and Rhizoctonia solani with Gliocladium virens in soilless mix. Phytopathology 79:361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Luong TM, Huynh LMT, Hoang HMT, Tesoriero LA, Burgess LW, Phan GHT, Davies P (2010) First report of Pythium root rot of chrysanthemum in Vietnam and control with metalaxyl drench. Aust Plant Dis Notes 5:51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Manjuntha SB, Biradar DP, Alandkantti YR (2016) Nanotechnology and its applications in agriculture. J Pharmacol Sci 29:1–13Google Scholar
  86. Mathur S, Thakore BL, Singh RB (1984) Effect of different fungicides on ginger rhizome rot pathogen and their effect on germination and rotting of rhizome. Indian J Mycol Plant Path 14:155–157Google Scholar
  87. Mathur K, Ram D, Poonia J, Lodha BC (2002) Integration of soil solarization and pesticides for management of rhizome rot of ginger. Indian Phytopath 55:345–347Google Scholar
  88. Mbarga JB, Hoopen GMT, Kuate J, Adiobo A, Ngonkeu MEL, Ambang Z, Akoa A, Tondje PR, Begoude BAD (2012) Trichoderma asperellum: a potential biocontrol agent for Pythium myriotylum, causal agent of cocoyam (Xanthosoma sagittifolium) root rot disease in Cameroon. Crop Protect 36:18e22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Meena KR, Kanwar SS (2015) Lipopeptides as the antifungal and antibacterial agents: applications in food safety and therapeutics. BioMed Res Int 2015:473050.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/473050 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Menendez E, Garcia-Fraile P (2017) Plant probiotic bacteria: solutions to feed the world. AIMS Microbiol 3:502–524PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. Mishra VK (2010) In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against Pythium aphanidermatum. J Phytol 2:28–35Google Scholar
  92. Mishra S, Singh BR, Singh A, Keswani C, Naqvi AH, Singh HB (2014) Biofabricated silver nanoparticles act as a strong fungicide against Bipolaris sorokiniana causing spot blotch disease in wheat. PLoS One 9:978–981Google Scholar
  93. Mitra M, Subramaniam LS (1928) Fruit rot diseases of cultivated Cucurbitaceous caused by Pythium aphanidermatum (Eds.) Fitz. Memorial Department of Agriculture India Botany 15:79–84Google Scholar
  94. Mohammady A, Abbas A (2017) Biological control of Pythium ultimum and Fusarium solani by indigenous strains Bacillus subtilis. Boil J microorg. https://www.academia.edu/32658977/Biological_control_of_Pythium_ultimum_and_Fusarium_solani_by_indigenous_strains_Bacillus_subtilis
  95. Moreira SI, Dutra DC, Rodrigues AC, de Oliveira JR, Dhingra OD, Pereira OL (2013) Fungi and bacteria associated with post-harvest rot of ginger rhizomes in Espírito Santo Brazil. Trop Plant Pathol 38:218–226Google Scholar
  96. Mudyiwa RM, Chaibva P, Takawira M (2016) Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum in controlling damping-off (Pythium spp.) on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedling varieties. Ann Biol Res 7(6):6–11Google Scholar
  97. Muthukumar A, Eswaran A, Nakkeeran S, Sangeetha G (2010) Efficacy of plant extracts and biocontrol agents against Pythium aphanidermatum inciting chilli damping off. Crop Prot 29:1483–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Muthukumar A, Eswaran A, Sanjeevkumas K (2011) Exploitation of Trichoderma species on the growth of Pythium aphanidermatum in chilli. Braz J Microbiol 42:1598–1607PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Naseby DC, Way JA, Bainton NJ, Lynch JM (2001) Biocontrol of Pythium in the pea rhizosphere by antifungal metabolite producing and non-producing Pseudomonas strains. J App Micro 90(3):421–429.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01260.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Nayak SK, Nayak S, Mishra BB (2017) Antimycotic role of soil bacillus sp. against rice pathogens: a biocontrol prospective. In: Patra J, Vishnuprasad C, Das G (eds) Microbial biotechnology. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  101. Oh SD, Lee S, Choi SH, Lee IS, Lee YM, Chun JH, Park HJ (2006) Synthesis of Ag and Ag-SiO2 nanoparticles by γ-irradiation and their antibacterial and antifungal efficiency against Salmonella enteric serovar Typhimurium and Botrytis cinerea. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 275:228–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Palumbo JD, Yuen GY, Jochum CC, Tatum K, Kobayashi DY (2005) Mutagenesis of beta-1, 3-glucanase genes in Lysobacter enzymogenes strain C3 results in reduced biological control activity toward Bipolaris leaf spot of tall fescue and Pythium damping-off of sugar beet. Phytopathology 95:701–707PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. Pandey M, Ahmad S, Khan KZ (2016) In Vitro evaluation of some antagonists and plant extracts against Pythium Aphanidermatum causes damping off of Chilli. Bioscan 11:879–884Google Scholar
  104. Parham BEV (1935) Annual report of general mycological and botanical work for 1934. Annual Bulletin Department of Agriculture, Fiji, 1935, pp 55–56Google Scholar
  105. Parizi MA, Moradpour Y, Roostaei A, KhaniM NM, Rahimi G (2014) Evaluation of the antifungal effect of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici pathogenic agent of tomato. Eur J Expt Biol 4:151–156Google Scholar
  106. Park M (1934) Report of the work of the mycological division. Annual report of Director of Agriculture, Ceylon, pp 126–133Google Scholar
  107. Park M (1935) Report of the work of the mycological division. Annual report of Director of Agriculture, Ceylon, pp 124–131Google Scholar
  108. Park M (1937) Report of the work of the mycological division. Annual report of Director of Agriculture, Ceylon, pp 20–21Google Scholar
  109. Parveen T, Sharma K (2014) Management of “Soft-rot” of ginger by botanicals. Int J Pharm Life Sci 5:3478–3484Google Scholar
  110. Patel MK, Kamat MN, Bhide VP (1949) Fungi of Bombay. Indian Phytopath 2:142–155Google Scholar
  111. Patel N, Desai P, Patel N, Jha A, Gautam HK (2014) Agro nanotechnology for plant fungal disease management a review. Int J Microbiol Appl Sci 3:71–84Google Scholar
  112. Peng YH, Chou YJ, Liu YC et al (2017) Inhibition of cucumber Pythium damping-off pathogen with zoosporicidal biosurfactants produced by Bacillus mycoides. J Plant Dis Prot 124:481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-017-0110-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ponmurugan P, Manjukarunagmbika K, Elango V, Gnamamangai BM (2016) Antifungal activity of biosynthesized copper nanoparticles evaluated against red root rot disease in tea plants. J Exp Nanosci 11:1019–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Pordesimo AN, Raymundo SA (1963) Rhizome rot of ginger and its control. Coffee Cocoa Res J 5:240Google Scholar
  115. Prasad R, Kumar V, Prasad KS (2014) Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: present concerns and future aspects. Afr J Biotechnol 13:705–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Prasad R, Bhattacharyya A, Nguyen QD (2017) Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: recent developments challenges and perspectives. Front Microbiol 8:1014.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb201701014 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. Quimio AJ, Chan HH (1979) Survival of Pseudomonas solanacearum in the rhizosphere of some weed and economic plant species. Philipp Phytopathol 15:108–121Google Scholar
  118. Rai M, Ingle A (2012) Role of nanotechnology in agriculture with special reference to management of insect’s pests. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94:287–293PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. Rai M, Ingle A, Paralikar P, Anasane N, Gade R, Ingle P (2018) Effective management of soft-rot of ginger caused by Pythium spp. and Fusarium spp.: emerging role of nanotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9145-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rajan PP, Gupta SR, Sarma YR, Jackson GVH (2002) Diseases of ginger and their control with Trichoderma harzianum. Indian Phytopathol 55:173–177Google Scholar
  121. Ram D, Mathur K, Lodha BC, Webster J (2000) Evaluation of resident biocontrol agents as seed treatments against ginger rhizome rot. Indian Phytopathol 53:450–454Google Scholar
  122. Ramachandran N, Dake GN, Sarma YR (1989) Effect of systemic fungicides on in vitro growth of Pythium aphanidermatum, the rhizome rot pathogen of ginger. Indian Phytopathol 42:463–465Google Scholar
  123. Ramy SY, Osama FA (2013) In vitro study of the antifungal efficacy of zinc oxide nanoparticles against Fusarium oxysporum and Penicillium expansum. Afr J Microbiol Res 7:1917–1923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Rao KJ, Paria S (2013) Use of sulfur nanoparticles as a green pesticide on Fusarium solani and Venturina equalis. Phytopathogens 3:10471–10478Google Scholar
  125. Rathaiah Y (1987) Control of soft-rot of ginger with Ridomil. Pesticides 21:29–30Google Scholar
  126. Ravi A, Varghese S, Krishnankutty RE (2017) Biocontrol activity of the extract prepared from Zingiber zerumbet for the management of rhizome rot in Zingiber officinale caused by Pythium myriotylum. Arch Phytopathol Plant Protect 50:555–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Ravindran PN, Babu N (eds) (2005) Ginger—the genus Zingiber. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 310Google Scholar
  128. Reddy MN, Charitha Devi M, Sreedevi NV (2003) Biological control of rhizome rot of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) caused by Fusarium solani. J Biol Control 17:193–195Google Scholar
  129. Sabir S, Arshad M, Chaudhari SK (2014) Zinc oxide nanoparticles for revolutionizing agriculture synthesis and applications. Sci World J 2014:925494.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/925494 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Sabu R, Soumya KR, Radhakrishnan EK (2017) Endophytic Nocardiopsis sp. from Zingiber officinale with both antiphytopathogenic mechanisms and antibiofilm activity against clinical isolates. 3 Biotech 7(2).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0735-4
  131. Sahare KC, Asthana RP (1962) Rhizome rot of ginger and its control. Indian Phytopathol 15:77–78Google Scholar
  132. Sarma YR, Nambiar KKN, Brahma RN (1979) Studies on rhizome rot of ginger and its control. In Venkataram CS (ed) Proceedings of PLACROSYM_II. 1979, Indian Society of Plantation Crops, Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasargod, Kerala, pp 386–397Google Scholar
  133. Sathiyabama M, Parthsarthy R (2016) Biological preparation of chitosan nanoparticale and its in vitro antifungal efficacy against some phytopathogenic fungi. Carbohydr Polym 151:321–325PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. Sekhon BP (2014) Nanotechnology in agri-food production: an overview. Nanotechnol Sci Appl 7:31–53PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  135. Sellem I, Triki MA, Elleuch L, Cheffi M, Chakchouk A, Smaoui S, Mellouli L (2017) The use of newly isolated Streptomyces strain TN258 as potential biocontrol agent of potato tubers leak caused by Pythium ultimum. J Basic Microbiol 57:393–401PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  136. Selvakumar R, Singh AK, Raja P (2013) Identification of potential Trichoderma sp. for management of rhizome rot of ginger in Arunachal Pradesh. Environ Ecol 31:67–70Google Scholar
  137. Sen TN (1930) Appendix I: IV Mycology: annual report of the Department of Agriculture. Assam 1929–39:57–59Google Scholar
  138. Shanmugam V, Gupta S, Dohroo NP (2013a) Selection of a compatible biocontrol strain mixture based on co-cultivation to control rhizome rot of ginger. Crop Prot 43:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Shanmugam V, Thakur H, Kaur J, Gupta S, Rajkumar S, Dohroo NP (2013b) Genetic diversity of Fusarium spp. inciting rhizome rot of ginger and its management by PGPR consortium in the western Himalayas. Biol Conl 66:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Sharan V, Sharma G, Yadav M, Choudhary MK, Shrma SS, Pal A, Raliya R, Biswas P (2015) Synthesis and in vitro antifungal efficacy of Cu-chitosan nanoparticles against pathogenic fungi of tomato. Int J Biol Macromol 75:346–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Sharma SL, Dohroo NP (1982) Efficacy of chemicals in controlling rhizome rot of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). In: Nair MK, Premkumar T, Ravindran PN, Sarma YR (eds) Proceedings of national seminar on Ginger and Turmeric Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasargod, Kerala, 8–9 April 1980, Calicut, pp 120–122Google Scholar
  142. Shende SS, Gaikwad ND, Bansod SD (2016) Synthesis and evaluation of antimicrobial potential of copper nanoparticle against agriculturally important phytopathogens. Int J Biol Res 1(4):41–47Google Scholar
  143. Singh AK (2011) Management of rhizome rot caused by Pythium fusarium and Ralstonia spp. in ginger (Zingiber officinale) under natural field conditions. Indian J Agric Sci 81:268–270Google Scholar
  144. Sivasakthi S, Usharani G, Saranraj P (2014) Biocontrol potentiality of plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPR)-Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis: A Review. Afr J Agric Res 9:1265–1277Google Scholar
  145. Smith M, Abbas R (2011) Controlling Pythium and associated pests in ginger. RIRDC publication No. 11/128, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  146. Smitha M, Singh R (2014) Biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi using mycolytic enzymes produced by rhizospheric bacteria of Cicer arietinum. Indian J Agric Biochem 27:215–218Google Scholar
  147. Srivastava LS (1994) Management of soft-rot of ginger in Sikkim. Plant Dis Res 9:146–149Google Scholar
  148. Stapleton JJ, Devay JE (1986) Soil solarization: a non-chemical approach for management of plant pathogens and pests. Crop Prot 5:190–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Stirling GR, Turaganivalu U, Stirling AM, Lomavatu MF, Smith MK (2009) Rhizome rot of ginger (Zingiber officinale) caused by Pythium myriotylum in Fiji and Australia. Australas Plant Pathol 38:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Suleiman M, Al Ali A, Hussein A, Hammouti B, Hadda TB, Warad I (2013) Sulfur nanoparticles: synthesis characterizations and their applications. J Mater Environ Sci 4:1029–1033Google Scholar
  151. Tahira P, Sharma K (2014) Phytochemical profiling of leaves and stem bark of Terminalia arjuna and Tecomella undulata. Int J Pharma Biosci 1:1–7Google Scholar
  152. Takahashi (1954) Pythium zingiberum. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 18:115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Thakore BBL, Mathur S, Singh RB (1988) Effect of rhizome treatment with fungicides for economic control of rot. J Phytol Res 1:83–84Google Scholar
  154. Thakur M, Sohal BS (2013) Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: a review. ISRN Biochem 2013:762412.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/762412 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. Thomas KM (1938) Administration report of the government mycologist, Madras, 1937-38Google Scholar
  156. Thomashow L, Weller DM (1996) Current concepts in the use of introduced bacteria for biological disease control: mechanisms and antifungal metabolites. In: Plant-microbe interactions. Springer, Boston, pp 187–235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1213-0_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Uma T, Mannam S, Lahoti J, Devi K, Kale RD, Bagyaraj DJ (2012) Biocidal activity of seed extracts of fruits against soil borne bacterial and fungal plant pathogens. J Biopest 5:103–105Google Scholar
  158. Uppal BN (1940) Report of the department of agriculture. Bombay 1938–39:203–211Google Scholar
  159. Viet PV, Nguyen HT, Cao TM, Hieu LV (2016) Fusarium antifungal activities of copper nanoparticles synthesized by a chemical reduction method. J Nanomater 2016:1957612.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1957612 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. Vinayaka KS, Prashitha Kekuda TR, Noor Nawaz AS, Junaid S, Dileep N, Rakesh KN (2014) Inhibitory Activity of Usnea pictoides G.Awasthi (Parmeliaceae) Against Fusarium oxysporum F. Sp. Zingiberi and Pythium aphanidermatum isolated from Rhizome Rot of Ginger. Life Sci Leafl 49:17–22Google Scholar
  161. Vinayarani G, Prakash HS (2018) Fungal endophytes of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and their biocontrol potential against pathogens Pythium aphanidermatum and Rhizoctonia solani. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34:49.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-018-2431-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  162. Wang PH, Chung CY, Lin YS, Yeh Y (2003) Use of polymerase chain reaction to detect the soft-rot pathogen Pythium myriotylum in infected ginger rhizomes. Lett Appl Microbiol 36:116–120PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  163. Wani AH, Shah MA (2012) A unique and profound effect of MgO and ZnO nanoparticles on some plant pathogenic fungi. J Appl Pharm Sci 02:40–44Google Scholar
  164. Whipps JM, Lumsden R (1991) Biological control of Pythium species. Biocontrol Sci Technol 1:75–90.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09583159109355188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Woo KS, Kim KS, Lamsal K, Kim YJ, Kim SB, Jung M, Sim SJ, Kim HS, Chang SJ, Kim JK, Lee YS (2009) An in vitro study of the antifungal effect of silver nanoparticles on oak wilt pathogen Raffaelea sp. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:760–764Google Scholar
  166. Yacoub A, Gerbore J, Magnin N, Haidar R, Compant S, Rey P (2017) Transcriptional analysis of the interaction between the oomycete biocontrol agent, Pythium oligandrum, and the roots of Vitis vinifera L. Biol Control 120:26–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Yang KD, Kim HM, Lee WH, So IN (1988) Studies on rhizome rot of ginger caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. zingiberi and Pythium zingiberum. Korean J Plant Pathol 4:271–277Google Scholar
  168. Zheng XY, Sinclair JB (2000) The effects of traits of Bacillus megaterium on seed and root colonization and their correlation with the suppression of Rhizoctonia root rot of soybean. BioControl 45:223.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009998304177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. Zouari I, Jlaiel L, Tounsi S, Trigui M (2016) Biocontrol activity of the endophytic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain CEIZ-11 against Pythium aphanidermatum and purification of its bioactive compounds. Biol Control 100:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahendra Rai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Patrycja Golińska
    • 2
  • Sudhir Shende
    • 1
  • Priti Paralikar
    • 1
  • Pramod Ingle
    • 1
  • Avinash P. Ingle
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologySGB Amravati UniversityAmravatiIndia
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyNicolaus Copernicus UniversityTorunPoland
  3. 3.Department of Biotechnology, Engineering School of LorenaUniversity of Sao PauloLorenaBrazil

Personalised recommendations