Advertisement

Universities as Contested Civic Spaces

  • Thomas Andrew BryerEmail author
  • Cristian Pliscoff
  • Ashley Wilt Connors
Chapter
Part of the Rethinking University-Community Policy Connections book series (REUNCOPOCO)

Abstract

Whereas we focus on civic risk taking in Chap.  6, including research, teaching, and other activities that might occur off campus or in partnership with community groups, in this chapter, we consider civic action on the university campus itself. Specifically, we consider the geographic space of the university campus as a contested civic space. We examine different ways in which individuals living or working on a university campus might be alternatively empowered or manipulated, or some of both, depending on the political sensitivity of an issue. We outline four strategies potentially employed by university leadership to either allow for or mitigate against certain kinds of participation of professors, staff, and students in civic and political activities: (1) controlled participation, (2) tokenistic participation, (3) symbolic or fake participation, and (4) authentic participation.

Keywords

Civic contestation Civic engagement Political engagement Forms of participation 

References

  1. Arnstein, S. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4): 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bryer, T.A. 2012. “Identity Crisis: Searching for Personal Responsibility, Justice, and Community in the Real Estate Market Crash.” Public Integrity, 14 (3): 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2014. “Together for Tomorrow: Improving Title I Education through Inter-Sectoral and Governmental Collaboration.” Journal of Public Management and Social Policy, 20 (1). https://digitalscholarship.tsu.edu/jpmsp/vol20/iss1/2.
  4. Bryer, T.A. and T.L. Cooper. 2012. “George Frederickson and the Dialogue on Citizenship in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review, 72: s108–s115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryer, T.A. and S. Prysmakova-Rivera. 2018. Poor Participation: Fighting the Wars on Poverty and Impoverished Citizenship. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, T.L. and T.A. Bryer. 2007. “William Robertson: Exemplar of Politics and Public Management Rightly Understood.” Public Administration Review, 67 (5): 816–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahl, R. 2005. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Frederickson, H.G. 1982. “The Recovery of Civism in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review, 42 (6): 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galea, S. 2018. “Free Speech Review Unnecessary, Australian Universities Say.” https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/free-speech-review-unnecessary-australian-universities-say
  10. Gillette, H. Jr. 2010. Civitas by Design: Building Better Communities, from the Garden City to the New Urbanism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goldstraw, K. and J. Diamond. 2017. “Civil Society and a Good Society: Conclusions from Our Collaborative Conversations.” I4P, Edge Hill University.Google Scholar
  12. Hollander, E.L. 2012. “De Tocqueville Rediscovered: Community-based Civic Engagement.” In The Engaged Campus, edited by D.W. Butin and S. Seider, 187–194. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hou, J. 2010. Insurgent Public Space: Guerrilla Urbanism and the Remaking of Contemporary Cities. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marcus, J. 2018. “Porn Start Talk Exposes Role of Funding in Free Speech Debate.” https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/porn-star-talk-exposes-role-funding-free-speech-debate
  15. Mehta, V. 2013. The Street: A Quintessential Social Public Space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Melish, T.J. 2010. “Maximum Feasible Participation of the Poor: New Governance, New Accountability, and a 21st Century War on the Sources of Poverty.” Yale Human Rights and Development Journal, 13 (1): 1–134.Google Scholar
  17. van der Merwe, S. 2007. “Failure to Discharge. A Discussion of the Insufficient Legal Recourse Afforded to Judgment Debtors in the South African Context.” Working paper.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2017. “A Case Study in Advocating for Expanded Clinical Legal Education: The University of Stellenbosch Module.” Stellenbosch Law Review, 28: 679–701.Google Scholar
  19. National Association of Scholars. 2017. Making Citizens: How American Universities Teach Civics. https://www.nas.org/projects/making_citizens_report
  20. Rech, C.S. 2015. A Murder in the Park. Sutton: Severn House.Google Scholar
  21. Turnage, C. 2017. “Most Republicans Think Colleges are Bad for the Country. Why?” The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Most-Republicans-Think/240587
  22. White, B.T. 2009. “Underwater and Not Walking Away: Shame, Fear and the Social Management of the Housing Crisis.” Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 09-35. James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Andrew Bryer
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Cristian Pliscoff
    • 3
  • Ashley Wilt Connors
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.Kaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania
  3. 3.Institute of Public AffairsUniversity of ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations