Advertisement

Mobility in Transition

  • David CairnsEmail author
  • Marine Sargsyan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter acknowledges the potential significance of recent political change in Armenia, specifically the impact of the Velvet Revolution of Spring 2018 on the lives of students and graduates. Considering the timeframe in which our fieldwork was conducted, July–September 2018, we were able to obtain some insight into the near immediate reactions of our interviewees, including the prospects for an enhancement of labour market chances at home. While some degree of hope has been generated, there are no definite signs of change in career direction being initiated at this stage, and while there is some optimism on display, more caution is in evidence, especially in regard to anticipated labour market reform.

Keywords

Armenia Velvet Revolution Political change Labour market reform 

References

  1. Ademmer, E., Delcourc, L., and Wolczuk, K. (2016). ‘Beyond geopolitics: Exploring the impact of the EU and Russia in the “contested neighborhood”’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 57, 1, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allaste, A.-A., and Cairns, D. (2016). ‘Youth political participation in a transition society’, Studies of Transition States and Societies, 8, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Bakker, T. P., and de Vreese, C. H. (2011). ‘Good news for the future? Young people, internet use, and political participation’, Communication Research, 38, 1, 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cairns, D., Alves, N. A., Alexandre, A., and Correia, A. (2016). Youth Unemployment and Job Precariousness: Political Participation in the Austerity Era. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Côté, J. E., and Bynner, J. (2008). ‘Changes in the transition to adulthood in the UK and Canada: The role of structure and agency in emerging adulthood’, Journal of Youth Studies, 11, 3, 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalton, R. J. (2008). ‘Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation’, Political Studies, 56, 1, 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delcour, L., and Wolczuk, K. (2015). ‘The EU’s unexpected “ideal neighbor”? The perplexing case of Armenia’s Europeanisation’, Journal of European Integration, 37, 4, 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fominaya, C. F. (2014). Social Movements and Globalization. How Protests, Occupations and Uprisings are Changing the World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Friere, M. R., and Simão, L. (2013). ‘“From words to deeds”: European Union democracy promotion in Armenia’, East European Politics, 29, 2, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Furlong, A., and Cartmel, F. (2007). Young People and Social Change. New Perspectives. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kalfayan, R. (2018, August 23). ‘Pashinyan needs to succeed, but questions remain about methods’, The Armenian Mirror-Spectator. Accessed at: https://mirrorspectator.com/2018/08/23/pashinyan-needs-to-succeed-but-questions-remain-about-methods/.
  13. Loda, C. (2017). ‘The European Union as a normative power: The case of Armenia’, East European Politics, 33, 2, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts, K., Clark, S. C., and Wallace, C. (1994). ‘Flexibility and individualisation: A comparison of transitions into employment in England and Germany’, Sociology, 28, 1, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stark, D., and Bruszt, L. (1998). Postsocialist Pathways. Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ter-Matevosyan, V., Drnoianb, A., Mkrtchyanc, N., and Yepremyan, T. (2017). ‘Armenia in the Eurasian Economic Union: Reasons for joining and its consequences’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 58, 3, 340–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vasilyan, S. (2017). ‘“Swinging on a pendulum”: Armenia in the Eurasian Economic Union and with the European Union’, Problems of Post-Communism, 64, 1, 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Veebel, V., Namm, A., and Tillmann, T. (2014). ‘Testing the myths of transition: Was Estonia following the shock therapy model and Slovenia following the gradualist model in 1991–2000?’ Studies of Transition States and Societies, 6, 2, 5–21.Google Scholar
  19. Verba, S., and Norman, N. (1972). Participation in America: Social Equality and Political Participation. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research and Studies in SociologyISCTE-University Institute of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Roma Tre UniversityRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations