Despite its popularity as a research topic, student and graduate mobility remains relatively undertheorized, especially in regard to explaining how and why certain individuals move abroad for work and study. Acknowledging this deficit, in this chapter we continue development of a line of inquiry introduced in our prior work: the idea that mobility decision-making can be conceptualized as a reflexive process. Rather than being passive or involuntary, it is hypothesized that outward mobility involves the use of agency and social networks as practical and imaginative resources. Building on ideas introduced by previous authors (e.g. the work of Margaret Archer), we also acknowledge the importance of the ‘internal conversation’ dimension of life planning and the significance of externalized dialogues taking place in education and the workplace. Echoing Anglophone youth sociology, mobility choices are thus viewed as individualized, albeit bounded by positive and negative factors relating to obstacles and opportunities.
KeywordsArmenia Mobility Reflexivity Margaret Archer
- Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Mkrtichyan, A., Vermishyan, H., and Balasanyan, S. (2016). Independence Generation Youth Study 2016—Armenia. Yerevan: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
- Moskal, M. (2018). ‘Gendered differences in international graduates’ mobility, identity and career development’, Social & Cultural Geography, https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2018.1499039.
- Saar, M. (2018). ‘Using reflexivity to explain variations in migration among the highly-skilled’, Identities, https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2017.1412179.