Advertisement

Mobility, Identity, and Complexity: Iranian Azerbaijanis in the U.S.

  • Farzad Karimzad
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, I draw on my ethnographic study of Iranian Azerbaijanis in the U.S. to illustrate how participants simultaneously draw on multiple scaled chronotopes (Bakhtin, 1981) to position themselves relative to notions of ethnicity, identity, and language. At times, the scope of the chronotopes participants invoke is so broad as to include all Turks beyond the limits of nation-states, while at times it is narrowed down to address local differences. Additionally, the invocation of certain chronotopes sometimes make ethnic and/or national identities salient centers of orientation, and some other times, the chronotopes they invoke lead to the construction of transnational and in-between identities. In re-conceptualizing diasporic identities, I argue for a focus on the multiple co-present dimensions of these identities and their interaction with individuals’ life trajectories and socialization histories.

Keywords

Mobility Polycentricity Chronotope Transnationalism Identity Azerbaijani/Azeri 

References

  1. Agha, A. (2007a). Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication, 27, 320–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agha, A. (2007b). Language and social relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bani-Shoraka, H. (2003). A revitalization of the Azerbaijani language and identity? Orientalia Suecana, 51–52, 17–24.Google Scholar
  6. Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blommaert, J. (2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blommaert, J. (2016). From mobility to complexity in sociolinguistic theory and method. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 242–259). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blommaert, J. (2017). Commentary: Mobility, contexts, and the chronotope. Language in Society, 46(1), 95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blommaert, J. (2018a, March 18). Chronotopes, synchronization and formats. CTRL + ALT + DEM. Available online https://alternative-democracy-research.org/2018/03/18/chronotopes-synchronization-and-formats/.
  11. Blommaert, J. (2018b). Durkheim and the Internet: Sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Blommaert, J., & De Fina, A. (2017). Chronotopic identities: On the timespace organization of who we are. In A. De Fina & J. Wegner (Eds.), Diversity and super-diversity (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Blommaert, J., & Rampton, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, 13(2), 3–21.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bozorgmehr, M., & Moeini Meybodi, M. (2016). The Persian paradox: Language use and maintenance among Iranian Americans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2016(237), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canagarajah, S., & De Costa, P. I. (2016). Introduction: Scales analysis, and its uses and prospects in educational linguistics. Linguistics and Education, 34, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carr, E. S., & Lempert, M. (2016). Introduction: Pragmatics of scale. In E. Sumerson Carr & M. Lempert (Eds.), Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life (pp. 1–21). Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Catedral, L. (2018). Discursive scaling: Moral stability and neoliberal dominance in the narratives of transnational migrant women. Discourse & Society, 29(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gal, S. (2016). Scale-making: Comparison and perspective as ideological projects. In E. Sumerson Carr & M. Lempert (Eds.), Scale: Discourse and dimensions of social life (pp. 91–111). Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gal, S. (2018). Discursive struggles about migration: A commentary. Language & Communication, 59, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goebel, Z. (2018). Transnationalism, globalisation, and superdiversity. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies 205. Available online https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/research/institutes-and-research-groups/babylon/tpcs/item-paper-205-tpcs/.
  22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gumperz, J. (1992). Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (Vol. 22, pp. 39–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, K. (2014). Hypersubjectivity: Language, anxiety, and indexical dissonance in globalization. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 24(2), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, K., & Nilep, C. (2015). Code switching, identity, and globalization. In D. Tannen, H. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), Handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Irvine, J., & Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In P. Kroskrity (Ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities and identities (pp. 35–83). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  27. Jacquemet, M. (2005). Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language & Communication, 25, 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacquemet, M. (2016). Language in the age of globalization. In N. Bonvillain (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic anthropology (pp. 329–347). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  29. Karimzad, F. (2016). Life here beyond now: Chronotopes of the ideal life among Iranian transnationals. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(5), 607–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karimzad, F. (2018). Language ideologies and the politics of language: The case of Azerbaijanis in Iran. In M. Djuraeva & F. V. Tochon (Eds.), Language policy or the politics of language: Re-imagining the role of language in a neoliberal society (pp. 53–75). Blue Mounds, WI: Deep University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Karimzad, F. (2019). Metapragmatics of normalcy: Mobility, context, and language choice. Language & Communication.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.02.001.
  32. Karimzad, F., & Catedral, L. (2018a). ‘No, we don’t mix languages’: Ideological power and the chronotopic organization of ethnolinguistic identities. Language in Society, 47(1), 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Karimzad, F., & Catedral, L. (2018b). Mobile (dis)connection: New technology and rechronotopized images of the homeland. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 28(3), 293–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Karimzad, F., & Sibgatullina, G. (2018). Replacing “them” with “us”: Language ideologies and practices of “purification” on Facebook. International Multilingual Research Journal, 12(2), 124–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lempert, M., & Perrino, S. (2007). Editorial: Entextualization and the end of temporality. Language & Communication, 27, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lo, A., & Park, J. (2017). Metapragmatics of mobility. Language in Society, 46(1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mirshahidi, S. (2017). I find you attractive but I don’t trust you: The case of language attitudes in Iran. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(2), 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mirvahedi, S. H. (2012). The role of satellite channels in language shift/maintenance: The case of Tabriz, Iran. In Proceedings of FEL XIV (pp. 36–41). Auckland: Foundation for Endangered Languages.Google Scholar
  39. Perrino, S., & Wortham, S. (2018). Discursive struggles over migration. Language & Communication, 59, 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Silverstein, M. (1992). The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough? In P. Auer & A. Di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (vol. 22, pp. 55–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  41. Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and meta-pragmatic function. In J. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language (pp. 32–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of social life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silverstein, M. (2005). Axes of evals: Token vs. type interdiscursivity. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 15(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Woolard, K. A. (1992). Language ideology: Issues and approaches. Pragmatics, 2(3), 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Woolard, K. A. (2013). Is the personal political? Chronotopes and changing stances toward Catalan language and identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(2), 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wortham, S., & Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse analysis beyond the speech event. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Farzad Karimzad
    • 1
  1. 1.Salisbury UniversitySalisburyUSA

Personalised recommendations