Aesthetic Criticism

  • Andrew Klevan


This chapter explains the characteristics and components of aesthetic criticism.


Criticism Aesthetic Evaluation 


  1. Arnheim, Rudolph. 1957. Film as Art. Berkeley/Los Angeles/California: California University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barthes, Roland. 2004 [1966]. Criticism and Truth. Trans. K. Pilcher Keuneman. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  3. Beardsley, Monroe C. 1981 [1958]. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 1981. The Name and Nature of Criticism. In What Is Criticism? ed. Paul Hernadi, 151–161. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, Michael. 1988. F.R. Leavis. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Black, Max. 1966. ‘Perfection’ as a Term in Aesthetics. In Art and Philosophy: A Symposium, ed. Sidney Hook, 32–35. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blandford, Steve, Barry Keith Grant, and Jim Hillier. 2001. The Film Studies Dictionary. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  8. Booth, Wayne C. 1975. A Rhetoric of Irony. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1988. The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Berkeley/Los Angeles: California University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Britton, Andrew. 2009. In Britton on Film: The Complete Film Criticism of Andrew Britton, ed. Barry K. Grant. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cardullo, Bert. 1997. Introduction. In Bazin at Work: Major Essays and Reviews from the Forties and Fifties, ed. Bert Cardullo, ix–xvi. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, Noël. 2002. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2009. On Criticism. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Casey, John. 2011 [1966. The Language of Criticism. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  15. Cavell, Stanley. 1981. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1996. Contesting Tears: The Hollywood Melodrama of the Unknown Woman. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2005. Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge/London: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  18. Clayton, Alex. 2015. V.F. Perkins: Aesthetic Suspense. In Thinking in the Dark: Cinema, Theory, Practice, ed. Murray Pomerance and R. Barton Palmer, 208–216. New Brunswick/London: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Daiches, David. 1969. Literary Evaluation. In Problems of Literary Evaluation, ed. Joseph P. Strelka, 163–181. University Park/London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Davidson, Hugh M. 1968. The Critical Position of Roland Barthes. In Criticism: Speculative and Analytical Essays, ed. L.S. Dembo, 93–102. Wisconsin/London: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  21. Day, Gary. 2010. Literary Criticism: A New History. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dhir, Meraj. 2011. A Gestalt Approach to Film Analysis. In Arnheim for Film and Media Studies, ed. Scott Higgins, 89–106. New York/Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Doorly, Patrick. 2013. The Truth About Art: Reclaiming Quality. Winchester/Washington: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  24. Dziemidok, Bohdan. 1983. Aesthetic Experience and Evaluation. In Essays on Aesthetics: Perspectives on the Work of Monroe Beardsley, ed. John Fisher, 53–68. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ellis, John M. 1981. The Logic of the Question “What Is Criticism?”. In What Is Criticism? ed. Pual Hernadi, 15–29. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fuller, David. 2006. William Empson: From Verbal Analysis to Cultural Criticism. In Literary Theory and Criticism: An Oxford Guide, ed. Patricia Waugh, 152–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fuller, Graham, and Terry Eagleton. 1983. The Question of Value: A Discussion. New Left Review I/142: 76–90.Google Scholar
  28. Gibbs, John. 2006. Filmmakers’ Choices. In Close-up 01, ed. John Gibbs and Douglas Pye, 1–87. London/New York: Wallflower.Google Scholar
  29. ———. 2013. The Life of Mise-en-Scène: Visual Style and British Film Criticism, 1946–78. Manchester/London: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gibbs, John, and Douglas Pye. 2005. Introduction. In Style and Meaning: Studies in the detailed analysis of film, ed. John Gibbs and Douglas Pye, 1–15. Manchester/New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Goldman, Alan H. 2004. Evaluating Art. In The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics, ed. Peter Kivy, 93–108. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Gombrich, E.H. 1978. A Historical Hypothesis. In History as a Tool in Critical Interpretation, ed. Thomas F. Rugh and Erin R. Silva, 39–42. Utah: Brigham Young University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Grant, James. 2013. The Critical Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Guyer, Paul. 2014. A History of Modern Aesthetics Volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Herrnstein Smith, Barbara. 1983. Contingencies of Value. Critical Inquiry 10 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. Cultural Evaluation. In Encyclopaedia of Aesthetics (Oxford Art Online), ed. Michael Kelly. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed 19 Apr 2017.
  37. Hinderer, Walter. 1969. Literary Value Judgments and Value Cognition. In Problems of Literary Evaluation, ed. Joseph P. Strelka, 54–79. University Park/London: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hough, Graham. 1966. An Essay on Criticism. London: Duckworth & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hume, David. 2008 [1757. Of the Standard of Taste. In Aesthetics: A Comprehensive Anthology, ed. Steven M. Cahn and Aaron Meskin, 103–112. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Isenberg, Arnold. 1973. In Aesthetics and the Theory of Criticism, ed. William Callaghan, Leigh Cauman, Carl Hempel, Sidney Morgenbesser, Mary Mothersill, Ernest Nagel, and Theodore Norman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kant, Immanuel. 1987 [1790]. Critique of Judgment. Trans. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
  42. Klevan, Andrew. 2011. Notes on Stanley Cavell and Philosophical Criticism. In New Takes in Film-Philosophy, ed. Havi Carel and Greg Tuck, 48–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 2012. Living Meaning: The Fluency of Film Performance. In Theorizing Film Acting, ed. Aaron Taylor, 33–46. New York/Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Krieger, Murray. 1968. Literary Analysis and Evaluation – And the Ambidextrous Critic. In Criticism: Speculative and Analytical Essays, ed. L.S. Dembo, 16–36. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  45. Kupperman, Joel J. 1966. Reasons in Support of Evaluations of Works of Art. The Monist 50 (2): 222–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leavis, F.R. 1972 [1936]. Revaluation. Middlesex: Penguin/Pelican.Google Scholar
  47. ———. 1984 [1952. The Common Pursuit. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
  48. Logan, William. 2008. Forward into the Past: Reading the New Critics. In Praising It New: The Best of the New Criticism, ed. Garrick Davis, ix–xvi. Athens: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Lyas, Colin. 2002. The Evaluation of Art. In Philosophical Aesthetics: An Introduction, ed. Oswald Hanfling, 349–380. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Macdonald, Margaret. 1965 [1949. Some Distinctive Features of Arguments Used in Criticism of the Arts. In Aesthetics, ed. Jerome Stolnitz, 98–112. New York/London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  51. McFee, Graham. 2011. Artistic Judgement: A Framework for Philosophical Aesthetics. Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Olsen, Stein H. 1987. The End of Literary Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. ———. Appreciation. In Encyclopaedia of Aesthetics (Oxford Art Online), ed. Michael Kelly. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed 30 Mar 2017.
  54. Osborne, Harold. 1955. Aesthetics and Criticism. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
  55. Pearsall, Judy, ed. 1998. The New Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  56. Perkins, V.F. 1990. Must We Say What They Mean? Film Criticism and Interpretation. Movie 34: 1–6.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 1991 [1972. Film as Film. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  58. Richards, I.A. 2001 [1924. Principles of Literary Criticism. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Schapiro, Meyer. 1966. On Perfection, Coherence, and Unity of Form and Content. In Art and Philosophy: A Symposium, ed. Sidney Hook, 3–15. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Scruton, Roger. 1974. Art and Imagination. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  61. ———. 1999. The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seamon, Roger. 2005. Criticism. In The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, ed. Berys Gaut and Dominic M. Lopes, 2nd ed., 401–415. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  63. Shusterman, Richard. 1984. The Object of Literary Criticism (Elementa 29). Amsterdam: K&N Kindle Edition.Google Scholar
  64. Sibley, Frank. 2006 [1950–93]. Approach to Aesthetics, ed. John Bensen, Betty Redfern, and Jeremy Roxbee Cox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smallwood, Philip. 2003. Reconstructing Criticism: Pope’s Essay on Criticism and the Logic of Definition. Lewisburg/London: Bucknell University Press/Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  66. Sontag, Susan. 2009 [1961. Against Interpretation and Other Essays. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  67. Sparshott, F.E. 1967. The Concept of Criticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  68. Steiner, George. 1995 [1962. F.R. Leavis. In 20th Century Literary Criticism: A Reader, ed. David Lodge, 622–635. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  69. Vendler, Helen. 1988. The Music of What Happens: Poems, Poets, Critics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Walton, Kendall L. 2008 [1970. Categories of Art. In Marvelous Images: On Values and the Arts, 195–219. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wellek, René. 1981. Literary Criticism. In What is Criticism? ed. Paul Hernadi, 297–321. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wimsatt, William K., Jr., and Monroe C. Beardsley. 1946. The Intentional Fallacy. Sewanee Review 54 (3): 468–488.Google Scholar
  73. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1989 [1966. Lectures and Conversations on Aesthetics, Psychology and Religious Belief. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  74. ———. 2006 [1953]. Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  75. Wollheim, Richard. 1987. Painting as an Art. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  76. Wood, Robin. 2006. Personal Views: Explorations in Film (Revised Edition). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Zangwill, Nick. Aesthetic Judgment. In Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Accessed 19 Apr 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Klevan
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations