Advertisement

A Disengaged Society?

  • Jean-Hervé LorenziEmail author
  • Mickaël Berrebi
Chapter

Abstract

Faced with sociological upheavals unknown since the second industrial revolution, society is sustaining two opposing visions of the coming months and years. One is rigid and closed: populism. The other is committed to redefining a modern humanism which is respectful to humans, their liberty and their dignity. Never, since the nineteenth century, have human societies, whether in developed or emerging countries, been so divided, nor the labour markets so polarised, and the middle classes produced by Fordism so fragile. For the first time in a long time, the spread of technology is playing a part in the gradual disappearance of politics and the emergence of a rejection of our democratic society.

References

  1. Balibar, E. (2017). ‘Populism’ and ‘Counter-Populism’ in the Atlantic Mirror. Open Democracy. Available via https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/can-europe-make-it/populism-and-counter-populism-in-atlantic-mirror/.
  2. Cowen, T. (2013). Average Is Over, Powering America Beyond the Age of the Great Stagnation. Boston: Dutton.Google Scholar
  3. Di Tella, R., & Rotemberg, J. J. (2016). Populism and the Return of the “Paranoid Style”: Some Evidence and a Simple Model of Demand for Incompetence as Insurance Against Elite Betrayal (Working Paper 17-056). Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  4. Freeland, C. (2013). The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich. Ted Conference. Available via https://www.ted.com/talks/chrystia_freeland_the_rise_of_the_new_global_super_rich.
  5. Garton Ash, T. (2016). Populists Are Out to Divide Us. They Must Be Stopped. The Guardian. Available via https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/11/populists-us.
  6. Lipietz, A. (1998). La Société en sablier – Le partage du travail contre la déchirure sociale [Society in an Hourglass—The Sharing of Work Versus Tearing the Social Fabric]. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  7. L’Observatoire des inégalités. (2018, March). Riches, pauvres et classes moyennes: comment se situer? [Rich, Poor and Middle Class—Where Do We Fit In?]. Available via https://www.inegalites.fr/Riches-pauvres-et-classes-moyennes-comment-se-situer.
  8. Marivaux. (1731–1742). La Vie de Marianne [The Life of Marianne]. Paris: Le Livre de poche, 2007.Google Scholar
  9. McKinsey. (2016, July). Poorer Than Their Parents? Flat or Falling Incomes in Advanced Economies. Available via https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/employment-and-growth/poorer-than-their-parents-a-new-perspective-on-income-inequality.
  10. OECD Focus. (2014). Top Incomes and Taxation in OECD Countries: Was the Crisis a Game Changer? Available via http://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2014-FocusOnTopIncomes.pdf.
  11. Oxfam. (2017). Just Eight Men Own Same Wealth as Half the World. Press Release. Available via https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2017-01-16/just-8-men-own-same-wealth-half-world.
  12. Pisani-Ferry, J. (2017). Le renoncement au progrès. Project Syndicate. English version available via https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/populism-and-abandonment-of-progress-by-jean-pisani-ferry-2017-01?barrier=accesspaylog.
  13. Stiglitz, J. E. (2016, March). The New Generation Gap. Project Syndicate. Available via https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/new-generation-gap-social-injustice-by-joseph-e–stiglitz-2016-03?barrier=accesspaylog.
  14. Tawney, R. H. (1964). Equality (1931). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. The World Bank. (2016). Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2016—Taking on Inequality. Available via http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity-2016.
  16. Zakaria, F. (1997, November–December). The Rise of Illiberal Democracy. Foreign Affairs, 76(6), 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paris Dauphine UniversityParisFrance
  2. 2.ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations