Advertisement

Leveraging Social Media to Track Urban Park Quality for Improved Citizen Health

  • Coline C. DonyEmail author
  • Emily Fekete
Chapter
Part of the Global Perspectives on Health Geography book series (GPHG)

Abstract

In this chapter, we showcase the use of qualitative data available on two “geobrowsers” (i.e., Google Maps and Foursquare) and of a data-mining technique to quantify the sentiment of online reviews about parks. The underlying interest for this study comes from the growing literature suggesting that living near parks or other open spaces contributes to higher levels of physical activity and to lower levels of stress and fewer mental health problems. Mecklenburg County (North Carolina), which encompasses the City of Charlotte, is used as a case study. In a comparison among 97 cities in the USA, The Trust for Public Land ranks Charlotte’s park system at the very bottom and reports their spending per resident on their park system among the lowest 20% of these cities. Considering their lower spending, the city government may be particularly interested to leverage publicly available data from social media to complement the assessments they already perform about their park system, such as satisfaction surveys or quality assessments. Nevertheless, Charlotte’s low ranking – although unfortunate – indicates an opportunity for the city to improve its park system, which in turn could engage residents in more physical activity and, in doing so, create positive community health outcomes.

Keywords

Parks Social media Charlotte NC Sentiment analysis Online reviews Urban health 

References

  1. Afzalan, N., & Muller, B. (2014). The role of social media in green infrastructure planning: A case study of neighborhood participation in park siting. Journal of Urban Technology, 21(3), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, S. J. (2014). Using social media to discover public values, interests, and perceptions about cattle grazing on park lands. Environmental Management, 53(2), 454–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, A., & Craig, C. L. (2005). The place of physical activity in the WHO Global Strategy on Diet and Physical Activity. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2(10), 10.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-2-10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bedimo-Rung, A. L., Mowen, A. J., & Cohen, D. A. (2005). The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 159–168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ampre.2004.10.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciuccarelli, P., Lupi, G., & Simeone, L. (2014). Visualizing the data city: Social media as a source of knowledge for urban planning and management. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crampton, J., & others. (2013). Beyond the Geotag: Situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the GeoWeb. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 40(2), 130–139.Google Scholar
  8. Crooks, A., Croitoru, A., Stefanidis, A., & Radzikowski, J. (2013). Earthquake: Twitter as a distributed sensor system. Transactions in GIS, 17(1), 124–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curran, W., & Hamilton, T. (2012). Just green enough: Contesting environmental gentrification in Greenpoint, Brooklyn. Local Environment, 17(9), 1027–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dai, D. (2011). Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in urban green space accessibility: Where to intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102(4), 234–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DHHS, United States. Department of Health. (2008). Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans: Be Active, Healthy, and Happy! (Vol. 36). Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Dony, C. C., Delmelle, E. M., & Delmelle, E. C. (2015). Re-conceptualizing accessibility to parks in multi-modal cities: A Variable-width Floating Catchment Area (VFCA) method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 143, 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fekete, E. (2015). Race and (online) sites of consumption. Geographical Review, 105(4), 472–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fekete, E. (2017). Foursquare in the city of fountains: Using Kansas City as a case study for combining demographic and social media data. In Thatcher, J., Eckert J., and A. Shears (Eds.), Thinking big data in geography: New regimes, new research,  (pp. 165–88). University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Fekete, E., & Warf, B. (2013). Information technology and the “Arab Spring”. The Arab World Geographer, 16(2), 210–227.Google Scholar
  16. Frieden, T. R. (2010). A framework for public health action: The health impact pyramid. American Journal of Public Health, 100(4), 590–595.  https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.185652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia Esparza, S., O’Mahony, M. P., & Smyth, B. (2010, September). On the real-time web as a source of recommendation knowledge. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on recommender systems (RecSys '10), Barcelona, Spain (pp.305-308). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1864708.1864773.
  18. Hill, J. O., Wyatt, H. R., Reed, G. W., & Peters, J. C. (2003). Obesity and the environment: Where do we go from here? Science, 299(5608), 853–855.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Boston, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koohsari, M. J., Kaczynski, A. T., Giles-Corti, B., & Karakiewicz, J. A. (2013). Effects of access to public open spaces on walking: Is proximity enough? Landscape and Urban Planning, 117, 92–99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leszczynski, A. (2012). Situating the GeoWeb in Political Economy. Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 7289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopez, R. P., & Hynes, H. P. (2006). Obesity, physical activity, and the urban environment: Public health research needs. Environmental Health, 5(25).  https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-5-25.
  23. MCDH, Mecklenburg County Department of Health. (2016) 2015 Mecklenburg County State of the Country Health Report, Mecklenburg County Department of Health, Health Statistics and Epidemiology. Available at: charmeck.org/mecklenburg/county/HealthDepartment/HealthStatistics
  24. McGinnis, J. M., & Foege, W. H. (1993). Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA, 270(18), 2207–2212.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510180077038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McGinnis, J. M., Williams-Russo, P., & Knickman, J. R. (2002). The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Affairs, 21(2), 78–93.  https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moon, G., & Gillespie, R. (1995). Society and health: An introduction to social science for health professionals. Routledge, London, UK. ISBN-13: 978-0415110228.Google Scholar
  27. Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H., & Carley, K. M. (2013, July). Is the sample good enough? comparing data from twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s Firehose. In Seventh international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Cambridge, MA, USA (pp. 400-408). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA, USA. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM13/paper/view/6071/6379.
  28. Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Basagaña, X., Cirach, M., Cole-Hunter, T., Dadvand, P., et al. (2016). Urban and transport planning related exposures and mortality: A health impact assessment for cities. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125, 89–96.  https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nielsen, F. A. (2011). A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. In Proceedings of the EWSC2011 workshop on ‘Making Sense of Microposts’: Big things come in small packages, Heraklion, Greece. (pp. 93–98). https://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2903.
  30. Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008). Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 2(1–2), 1–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parks, S. E., Housemann, R. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2003). Differential correlates of physical activity in urban and rural adults of various socioeconomic backgrounds in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.1.29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paul, M. J., & Dredze, M. (2011, July). You are what you Tweet: Analyzing Twitter for public health. In The Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM-11), Barcelona, Spain, (pp. 265–272). Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, CA, USA. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM11/paper/view/2880/3264.
  33. Peuquet, D. J., & Kraak, M. J. (2002). Geobrowsing: Creative thinking and knowledge discovery using geographic visualization. Information Visualization, 1(1), 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pew Internet Research. (2018). Social media fact sheet. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/social-media/. Accessed 31 July 2018.
  35. Physical Activity Council. (2016). 2016 participation report. Available at: physicalactivitycouncil.com. Accessed 20 May 2016.
  36. Rainie, L. (2018). Americans’ complicated feelings about social media in an era of privacy concerns. Pew Internet Research. Available at: http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/27/americans-complicated-feelings-about-social-media-in-an-era-of-privacy-concerns/. Accessed 31 July 2018.
  37. Rosenberger, R. S., Sneh, Y., Phipps, T. T., & Gurvitch, R. (2005). A spatial analysis of linkages between health care expenditures, physical inactivity, obesity and recreation supply. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salathé, M., & Khandelwal, S. (2011). Assessing vaccination sentiments with online social media: Implications for infectious disease dynamics and control. PLoS Computer Biology, 7(10), e1002199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., Graham, M., & Zook, M. (2014). Mapping the data shadows of Hurricane Sandy: Uncovering the sociospatial dimensions of big data. Geoforum, 52, 167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., & Zook, M. (2015). Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 198–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. TPL, Trust for Public Land. (2010). The economic benefits of the park and recreation system of Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. Available at: tpl.org/charlottemecklenburg-county-park-value-report. Accessed 15 Mar 2014.
  42. TPL, Trust for Public Land. (2016). ParkScore index. Available at: parkscore.tpl.org. Accessed 16 May 2016.
  43. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005, October). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the conference on human language technology and empirical methods in natural language processing (HLT'05), Vancouver, Canada (pp. 347–354). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA.  https://doi.org/10.3115/1220575.1220619.
  44. Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wong, C. A., Sap, M., Schwartz, A., Town, R., Baker, T., Ungar, L., & Merchant, R. M. (2015). Twitter sentiment predicts affordable care act marketplace enrollment. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(2), e51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American Association of GeographersWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations