Towards a Posthumanist Conceptualization of Society: Biotechnology in Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam Trilogy and Ruth Ozeki’s All Over Creation
This chapter investigates how current controversial biotechnological advancements, particularly regarding genetically modified food, enable conceptual as well as ontological changes of humanity and the human. Drawing on debates in the field of posthumanism in my analysis of Margaret Atwood’s MaddAddam trilogy and Ruth Ozeki’s novel All Over Creation, I demonstrate the significance of literary contributions to the topic. From an ethical vantage point grounded in critical posthumanism, I explore how imaginations of biotechnology impact on concepts of posthuman society. Ultimately, I argue, anthropocentric and essentialist views on identity, race, gender, and family can be overcome by more valuable connectivities based on elective affiliations offered in the texts.
- Abrams, M.H. (1999). “Utopias and Dystopias.” A Glossary of Literary Terms. Seventh Edition. Heinle & Heinle. 327–328.Google Scholar
- Atwood, Margaret (2003). Oryx and Crake. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
- ——— (2009). The Year of the Flood. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
- ——— (2010). “Atwood on Science, Fiction and ‘The Flood.’” Author Interviews. By Jane Ciabattari. Heard on Talk of the Nation, 20 Aug. 2010. Web.Google Scholar
- ——— (2013). MaddAddam. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
- Bartosch, Roman (2012). “Literary Quality and the Ethics of Reading: Some Thoughts on Literary Evolution and the Fiction of Margaret Atwood, Ilija Trojanow, and Ian McEwan.” Literature, Ecology, Ethics: Recent Trends in Ecocriticism. Eds. Timo Müller and Michael Sauter. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter. 113–128.Google Scholar
- Borrell, Sally (2009). Challenging Humanism: Human-Animal Relations in Recent Postcolonial Novels. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Middlesex University. Web. 5 Feb. 2018. <http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6520/>.
- ——— (2015). “A ‘Joke-Filled Romp’ through End Rimes: Radical Environmentalism, Deep Ecology, and Human Extinction in Margaret Atwood’s Eco-Apocalyptic MaddAddam Trilogy.” The Journal of Commonwealth Literature 51.3: 1–17.Google Scholar
- Cardozo, Karen and Banu Subramaniam (2011). “Truth is Stranger: The Postnational ‘Aliens’ of Biofiction.” The Postnational Fantasy: Essays on Postcolonialism, Cosmopolitics and Science Fiction. Eds. Masood A. Raja, Jason W. Ellis, and Swaralipi Nandi. Jefferson and London: McFarland & Company. 30–45.Google Scholar
- DiNovella, Elizabeth (2003). “No Small Potatoes.” The Progressive 41: 41–43.Google Scholar
- “Dystopia.” Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, no date. Web. 17 May 2018.
- Fukuyama, Francis (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
- Garrigós, Cristina (2010). “Mixed and Proud of it: Women and Meat in Ruth Ozeki’s Fiction.” Diferencia, (Des)igualdad Y Justicia/Differences, (In)Equality and Justice. Eds. Ana Antón-Pachecco Bravo, et al. Madrid: Editorial Fundamentos. 65–77.Google Scholar
- Haraway, Donna J. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
- Herbrechter, Stefan (2013). Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis. Trans. Stefan Herbrechter. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
- Hoban, Thomas J. (1995). “The Construction of Food Biotechnology as a Social Issue.” Eating Agendas. Food and Nutrition as Social Problems. Eds. Donna Maurer and Jeffery Sobal. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. 189–209.Google Scholar
- Höpker, Karin (2014). “A Sense of an Ending—Risk, Catastrophe and Precarious Humanity in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” The Anticipation of Catastrophe: Environmental Risk in North American Literature and Culture. Eds. Sylvia Mayer and Alexa Weik von Mossner. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter. 161–180.Google Scholar
- Ladino, Jennifer K. (2008). “Unlikely Alliances: Notes on a Green Culture of Life.” Journal of Religion and Society, Supplement Series 3: 146–158.Google Scholar
- Mosca, Valeria (2013). “Crossing Human Boundaries: Apocalypse and Posthumanism in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood.” Altre Modernità 9: 38–52.Google Scholar
- Nayar, Pramod K. (2014). Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Ozeki, Ruth (2004). “A Conversation with Ruth Ozeki.” Interview. Web. 5 Feb. 2018. <http://www.ruthozeki.com/writing-film/creation/read/>.
- ——— (2006). All Over Creation. London: Picador.Google Scholar
- Philbeck, Thomas D. (2014). “Ontology.” Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction. Eds. Robert Ranisch and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 173–184.Google Scholar
- Pollack, Andrew (2015). “Genetically Engineered Salmon Approved for Consumption.” The New York Times. 19 Nov. 2015. Web. 5 Feb. 2018.Google Scholar
- Ranisch, Robert and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner (2014). “Introducing Post- and Transhumanism.” Post- and Transhumanism: An Introduction. Eds. Robert Ranisch and Stefan Lorenz Sorgner. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 7–27.Google Scholar
- Roddis, Melissa (2013). “‘Someone Else’s Utopia’: The Eco-Posthuman ‘Utopia’ of Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Writing Technologies 5: 19–35.Google Scholar
- Roden, David (2015). Posthuman Life: Philosophy at the Edge of the Human. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rozelle, Lee (2010). “Liminal Ecologies in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake.” Canadian Literature 206: 61–72.Google Scholar
- Stein, Karen F. (2010). “Problematic Paradice in Oryx and Crake.” Margaret Atwood: The Robber Bride, The Blind Assassin, Oryx and Crake. Ed. J.B. Bouson. London and New York: Continuum. 141–155.Google Scholar
- Tiffin, Helen (2007). “Pigs, People and Pigoons.” Knowing Animals. Eds. Laurence Simmons and Philip Armstrong. Leiden: Brill. 244–265.Google Scholar
- Wolfe, Cary (2010). What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar