Advertisement

Neuropathologies: Cognition, Technology, and the Network Paradigm in Scott Bakker’s Neuropath and Dave Eggers’s The Circle

  • Julius Greve
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

This chapter attempts to think the ways in which the strong tendency in literary production and criticism to analyze the human animal according to criteria dictated by the cognitive sciences and their technologies converges with a complementary discourse determined by the paradigmatic notion of “the network.” In order to explicate this discursive and, consequently, practical convergence of today’s technologies of cognition and the network paradigm, Greve offers a comparative reading of Scott Bakker’s Neuropath (2008) and Dave Eggers’s The Circle (2013). Along the lines of recent neurophilosophical developments, Greve demonstrates that, given the drastic changes of the scientifico-technological impact on human subjectivities, we might conceptualize Bakker’s and Eggers’s fictions as neuropathologies of everyday life.

Works Cited

  1. Atwood, Margaret (2014). “Circle dustjacket.” Dave Eggers. The Circle. 2013. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bakker, R. Scott (2008). “The End of the World as We Knew It: Neuroscience and the Semantic Apocalypse.” Three Pound Brain. Web. 5 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  3. ———. (2009). Neuropath. London: Orion Books.Google Scholar
  4. ———. (2012a). “How to Build a First-Person (Using Only Natural Materials).” Three Pound Brain. Web. 14 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  5. ———. (2012b). “The Last Magic Show: A Blind Brain Theory of the Appearance of Consciousness.” Web. 14 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Bargh, John A., and Ezequiel Morsella (2008). “The Unconscious Mind.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3.1: 73–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, M.R. and P.M.S. Hacker (2005). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Bermúdez, José Luis (2006). “Arguing for Eliminativism.” Paul Churchland. Ed. Brian L. Keeley. New York: Cambridge University Press. 32–65.Google Scholar
  9. Berressem, Hanjo (2015). “Déja Vu: Serres after Latour, Deleuze after Harman, ‘Nature Writing’ after ‘Network Theory’.” Amerikastudien/American Studies 60.1: 59–79.Google Scholar
  10. Brassier, Ray (2007). Nihil Unbound. Extinction and Enlightenment. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. (2009). “Genre is Obsolete.” Noise & Capitalism. Eds. Mattin Iles and Anthony Iles. Donostia-S. Sebastiá: Arteleku Audiolab. 60–71.Google Scholar
  12. ———. (2011a). “Concepts and Objects.” The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Eds. Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman. Melbourne: re.press. 47–65.Google Scholar
  13. ———. (2011b). “The View from Nowhere.” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture 8.2: 7–23.Google Scholar
  14. ———. (2012). “Interview with After Nature Blog.” After Nature Blog. 26 Aug. 2012. Web. 14 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  15. Churchland, Patricia S. (1996a). “Do We Propose to Eliminate Consciousness?” The Churchlands and Their Critics. Ed. Robert N. McCauley. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. 297–300.Google Scholar
  16. ———. (1996b). Neurophilosophy: Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Churchland, Paul M. (1989). A Neuromputational Perspective. The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Damasio, Antonio (2003). Looking for Spinoza. Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain. New York: Harcourt, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Debiec, Jacek and Joseph E. Ledoux (2003). “Conclusions: From Self-Knowledge to a Science of the Self.” Annals New York Academy of Sciences 1001: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eggers, Dave (2014). The Circle. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  21. Fisher, Mark (2012). “A Critique of Practical Nihilism: Agency in Scott Bakker’s ‘Neuropath.’” Incognitum Hactenus: Journal on Art, Horror, and Philosophy 2: 5–12.Google Scholar
  22. Freißmann, Stephan (2012). “Cognition—A Travelling Concept at the Interface between Cognitive Science and Literary Studies.” Travelling Concepts, Metaphors, and Narratives: Literary and Cultural Studies in an Age of Interdisciplinary Research. Eds. Sibylle Baumbach, Beatrice Michaelis, and Ansgar Nünning. Trier: WVT. 55–68.Google Scholar
  23. Galloway, Alexander R. (2014). “Network Pessimism.” 10 Nov. 2014. Web. 17 Apr. 2018.Google Scholar
  24. Galloway, Alexander R. and Eugene Thacker (2007). The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gibbons, Alison (2015). “Eyes of the World.” American Book Review 36.5: 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haggard, Patrick (2005). “Conscious Intention and Motor Cognition.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9.6: 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jameson, Fredric (1988). “Cognitive Mapping.” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Ed. Nelson, Cary and Lawrence Grossberg. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. 347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kelleter, Frank (2007). “A Tale of Two Natures: Worried Reflections on the Study of Literature and Culture in an Age of Neuroscience and Neo-Darwinism.” Journal of Literary Theory 1.1: 153–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koch, Christof and Giulio Tononi (2008). “Can Machines Be Conscious?” IEEE Spectrum 45.6: 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malabou, Catherine (2008). What Should We Do With Our Brain? Trans. Sebastian Rand. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Metzinger, Thomas (1993). Subjekt und Selbstmodell. Die Perspektivität phänomenalen Bewußtseins vor dem Hintergrund einer naturalistischen Theorie mentaler Repräsentation. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.Google Scholar
  32. ———. (2003). Being No-One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. (n.d.). “Blurbs.” R. Scott Bakker. Web. 28 Mar. 2018.Google Scholar
  34. Neurorelay: Thinking Through the Mind of the Consumer (2012). “Neuromarketing Companies Worldwide.” 8 May 2012. Web. 10 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  35. Noë, Alva, and Evan Thompson (2002). “Introduction.” Vision and Mind. Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception. Eds. Alva Noë and Evan Thompson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pradeep, A.K. (2010). The Buying Brain. Secrets for Selling to the Subconscious Mind. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  37. Roskies, Adina (2006). “Neuroscientific Challenges to Free Will and Responsibility.” Trends in Cognitive Science 10.9: 419–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schröder, Jürgen (1997). “Qualia und Physikalismus.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science/Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28.1: 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sellars, Wilfrid (1963). Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  40. Shaviro, Steven (2015). Discognition. London: Repeater Books.Google Scholar
  41. Singer, Natasha (2010). “Making Ads That Whisper to the Brain.” The New York Times. 13 Nov. 2010. Web. 20 Apr. 2013.Google Scholar
  42. Starre, Alexander (2015). Metamedia: American Book Fictions and Literary Print Culture after Digitization. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson, Evan, Adrian Palacios and Francisco J. Varela (2002). “Ways of Coloring: Comparative Color Vision as a Case Study for Cognitive Science.” Vision and Mind. Selected Readings in the Philosophy of Perception. Eds. Alva Noë and Evan Thompson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 351–418.Google Scholar
  44. Wegner, Daniel M. (2002). The Illusion of Conscious Will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. (2003). “The Mind’s Self-Portrait.” Annals New York Academy of Sciences 1001: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julius Greve
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OldenburgOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations