A Preliminary Exploration of the Professional Support Networks the EDGE Program Creates

  • Candice R. PriceEmail author
  • Nina H. Fefferman
Part of the Association for Women in Mathematics Series book series (AWMS, volume 18)


Programs such as the Enhancing Diversity in Graduate Education (EDGE) Program for women focus on improving outcomes for women and minorities in postgraduate degree programs in mathematics. One of the functions of these programs is increasing the size and reach of professional networks, including both mentors and peers. This is, in part, based on research showing a direct correlation between the strength of professional networks and individual professional success. However, little work has been done to analyze networks created by such programs. We extracted the network connections between EDGE participants from their undergraduate and graduate training in addition to their EDGE co-participants. We then examined these connections according to some frequently explored metrics of network organization to ascertain whether features of participation within the EDGE network were critical to individual success. Unfortunately, for the purpose of this work, EDGE was a victim of its own success: nearly all the past participants of the program were successfully employed in roles that utilized their postgraduate degrees in mathematics! We subsequently chose a more restrictive definition for success and explored factors within the available EDGE network that might predict the completion of a doctoral degree in mathematics. Our preliminary study lays the groundwork for future efforts to understand the true impact of EDGE-like programs and how to design purposefully targeted, efficient, and effective interventions.



The authors both wish to thank the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) for visitor support to CRP.


  1. 1.
    Addressing stem culture and climate to increase diversity in stem disciplines. Higher Education Today, May 2018.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Mathematical Society. The American Mathematical Society, Annual Survey. [Online; accessed 27-July-2018].
  3. 3.
    T. T. Baldwin, M. D. Bedell, and J. L. Johnson. The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of management journal, 40(6):1369–1397, 1997.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. C. Freeman. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3):215–239, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    L. C. Freeman, D. Roeder, and R. R. Mulholland. Centrality in social networks: ii. experimental results. Social networks, 2(2):119–141, 1979.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. M. Merolla and R. T. Serpe. Stem enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: the role of science identity salience. Social Psychology of Education, 16(4):575–597, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. W.-L. Packard and N. L. Fortenberry. Successful STEM mentoring initiatives for underrepresented students: a research-based guide for faculty and administrators. Stylus, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. T. Palmer, D. C. Maramba, and T. E. Dancy. A qualitative investigation of factors promoting the retention and persistence of students of color in stem. The Journal of Negro Education, pages 491–504, 2011.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    The EDGE Program for women. EDGE Awards., 1998. [Online; accessed 27-July-2018].
  10. 10.
    The Mathematical Association of America. A graduate school primer. [Online; accessed 27-July-2018].
  11. 11.
    S. Weerahandi. ANOVA under unequal error variances. Biometrics, pages 589–599, 1995.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wikimedia Foundation. Erds number., 1998. [Online; accessed 2-July-2018].
  13. 13. The EDGE program for women., 1998. [Online; accessed 27-July-2018].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) and the Association for Women in Mathematics 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of San DiegoSan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations