Re-programming the Present: The Dynamism of Black Futurity in Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robber

  • Cienna Davis


This chapter investigates the tangibility and productiveness of Afrofuturism as an aesthetic mode and genre invested in utopia. It argues that Hopkinson’s Midnight Robber exemplifies the potency of Afrofuturism as a tool of political intervention that merges mythology and technology to create a critical utopia that confirms the ingenuity of the Black technological imagination while resisting the institutionalization of essentialist visions of Black futurity. It argues that the significance of Afrofuturism lies in its encouragement of dynamic and flexible imaginings of Black futurity that draw upon the counter-memories of the past to reprogram the present. The chapter concludes by demonstrating the implications of Hopkinson’s fictitious, utopian interventions upon Black-led resistance movements of today’s digital age.


  1. Adorno, Theodor W and Max Horkheimer. “The Concept of Enlightenment.” In Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments, 3–42. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. Anatol, Giselle L. “Maternal Discourses in Nalo Hopkinson’s ‘Midnight Robber’.” African American Review 40, no. 1 (2006): 111–124.Google Scholar
  3. Bould, Mark. “The Ships Landed Long Ago: Afrofuturism and Black SF.” Science Fiction Studies 34, no. 2 (2007): 177–186.Google Scholar
  4. The British Library Board. “Utopia.” The British Library. Accessed 20 April 2018.
  5. Dery, Mark. “Black to the Future: Interviews with Samuel R. Delany, Greg Tate, and Tricia Rose.” In Flame Wars: Discourse of Cyberculture, 179–222. Durham: Duke University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  6. Dubey, Madhu. “Becoming Animal in Black Women’s Science Fiction.” In Afro-Future Females: Black Writers Chart Science Fiction’s Newest New-Wave Trajectory, 31–51. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Edwards, Elisa. Race, Aliens, and the U.S. Government in African American Science Fiction. Berlin: LIT, 2011.Google Scholar
  8. Eshun, Kodwo. “Further Considerations of Afrofuturism.” CR: The New Centennial Review 3, no. 2 (2003): 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferns, C. S. Narrating Utopia: Ideology, Gender, Form in Utopian Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Fitting, Peter. “The Concept of Utopia in the Work of Fredric Jameson.” Utopian Studies 9, no. 2 (1998), 8–17.Google Scholar
  11. Ghee, Kenneth. “Will the ‘Real’ Black Superheroes Please Stand Up?!” In Black Comics: Politics of Race and Representation, edited by Sheena C. Howard and Ronald L. Jackson, 223–238. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Glave, Dianne D., and Nalo Hopkinson. “An Interview with Nalo Hopkinson.” Callaloo 26, no. 1 (2003): 146–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobson, Janell. “Digital Whiteness, Primitive Blackness.” Feminist Media Studies 8, no. 2 (2008): 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hopkinson, Nalo. Midnight Robber. New York: Aspect, 2000. Kindle.Google Scholar
  15. Hopkinson, Nalo. “A Conversation with Nalo Hopkinson.” SF Site. Last modified 2000.
  16. Hopkinson, Nalo. “A Dialogue on SF and Utopian Fiction, Between Nalo Hopkinson and Elisabeth Vonaburg.” Foundation 30, no. 81 (2001): 40–47.Google Scholar
  17. Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  18. Khan-Cullors, Patrisse. “We Didn’t Start a Movement. We Started a Network.” Medium. Last modified 23 February 2016.
  19. Lavendar III, Isiah. “Critical Race Theory.” In The Routledge Companion to Science Fiction, edited by Mark Bould, Andrew M. Butler, Adam Roberts, and Sherryl Vint, 185–193. London: Routledge, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. Moylan, Tom. Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination. New York: Methuen, 1986.Google Scholar
  21. Mukherjee, Paromita. “Creolizing Nation Language, Folklore and Science Fiction: Nalo Hopkinson’s Rhetorical Strategy in Midnight Robber.” Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 4, no. 2 (2012).Google Scholar
  22. Nelson, Alondra, Thuy Linh N. Tu, and Alicia Headlam Hines. “Introduction.” In Technicolor: Race, Technology, and Everyday Life, 1–12. New York: New York University, 2001.Google Scholar
  23. Nichols, William, and Henry P. Charles. “Imagining a Future in America: A Racial Perspective.” Alternative Futures: Journal of Utopian Studies 1, no. 1 (1978): 39–50.Google Scholar
  24. Serruys, Nicholas. “Review of Utopia Method Vision: The Use Value of Social Dreaming, by Tom Moylan and Raffaella Baccolini, ed.” Utopian Studies 19, no. 2 (2008): 343–439.Google Scholar
  25. Shaw, Heather. “Under the Daddy Tree: Family Relations in Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robber.” Strange Horizons, August 2001.
  26. Sisson, Patrick. “Space Is the Place: The Architecture of Afrofuturism.” Curbed. Last modified 22 February 2016.
  27. Smith, Aaron. “African Americans and Technology Use: A Demographic Portrait.” Pew Research Center. Last modified 6 January 2014.
  28. Smith, Barbara. “Toward a Black Feminist Criticism.” Radical Teacher, no. 7 (March 1978): 20–27.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, Eric D. “‘The Only Way Out Is Through’: Space, Narrative, and Utopia in Nalo Hopkinson’s Midnight Robber.Genre XLII (Spring 2009): 135–163.Google Scholar
  30. Tvochannel. “Nalo Hopkinson on Utopian Literature.” YouTube, 24 April 2009.
  31. Veselá, Pavla. “Neither Black nor White: The Critical Utopias of Sutton E. Griggs and George S. Schuyler.” Science Fiction Studies 38, no. 2 (2011): 270–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cienna Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.John F. Kennedy Institute for North American StudiesFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations