Advertisement

How Soil, Plant, and Atmosphere Properties Vary in Space and Time in the SPAS: An Approach to Geostatistics

  • Klaus Reichardt
  • Luís Carlos Timm
Chapter

Abstract

Spatial and temporal variability of attributes of the soil–plant–atmosphere system is analyzed in this chapter based on the classical statistics of Fisher and on geostatistics. Several specific concepts are introduced, like the sampling transects or grids. It is shown that the classical statistics and geostatistics complement each other. Mean or average, variance, standard deviation, quartiles, and moments of sampled populations are introduced in detail. Outliers of a set of collected data are defined and the criteria to eliminate them are presented. An introduction to the box plots technique, the normal frequency distribution, the lognormal distribution, covariance, autocorrelation, and semivariograms is also given. Finally, the concepts of kriging, pedotransfer functions, and neural networks are also introduced.

References

  1. Ahuja LR, Naney JW, Williams RD (1985) Estimating soil water characteristics from simpler properties or limited data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1100–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arruda FB, Zullo Junior J, Oliveira JB (1987) Parâmetros de solo para o cálculo da água disponível com base na textura do solo. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 11:11–15Google Scholar
  3. Arya LM, Paris JF (1981) A physico-empirical model to predict the soil moisture characteristic from particle-size distribution and bulk density data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:1023–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barros AHC, De Jong van Lier Q (2014) Pedotransfer functions for Brazilian soils. In: Teixeira WG, Ceddia MB, Ottoni MV, Donnagema GK (eds) Application of soil physics in environmental analysis: measuring, modeling and data integration. Springer, New York, NY, pp 131–162Google Scholar
  5. Baxt WG (1991) Use of an artificial neural network for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 115:843–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bitencourt DGB, Timm LC, Guimarães EC, Pinto LFS, Pauletto EA, Penning LH (2015) Spatial variability structure of the surface layer attributes of Gleysols from the Coastal Plain of Rio Grande do Sul. Biosci J 31:1711–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloemen GW (1980) Calculation of hydraulic conductivities from texture and organic matter content. Z Pflanz Bod 143:581–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Botula YD, Van Ranst E, Cornelis WM (2014) Pedotransfer functions to predict water retention for soils of the humid tropics: a review. Braz J Soil Sci 38:679–698Google Scholar
  9. Bouma J (1989) Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Adv Soil Sci 9:177–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brooks RH, Corey AT (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  11. Cambardella CA, Moorman TB, Novak JM, Parkin TB, Karlen DL, Turco RF, Konopka AE (1994) Field-scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:1501–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll ZL, Oliver MA (2005) Exploring the spatial relations between soil physical properties and apparent electrical conductivity. Geoderma 128:354–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassalho F, Beskow S, Mello CR, Moura MM, Kerstner L, Ávila LF (2018) At-site flood frequency analysis coupled with multiparameter probability distributions. Water Resour Manag 32:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark I (1979) Practical geostatistics. Applied Science Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Cornelis WM, Ronsyn J, Van Meirvenne M, Hartmann R (2001) Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for predicting the soil moisture retention curve. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:638–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cressie NAC, Hawkins DM (1980) Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Math Geol 12:115–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis JC (1986) Statistics and data analysis in geology, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  19. Duda RO, Hart PE (1973) Pattern classification and scene analysis. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  20. Eriksson M, Siska P (2000) Understanding anisotropy computations. Math Geol 326:683–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flury B, Riedwyl H (1990) Multivariate statistics: a practical approach. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Fujita H, Katafuchi T, Uehara T, Nishimura T (1992) Application of artificial neural network to computer aided diagnosis of coronary artery disease in myocardial spect bull’s-eye images. J Nucl Med 33:272–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Giarola NFB, Silva AP, Imhoff S (2002) Relações entre propriedades físicas e características de solos da região sul do Brasil. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 26:885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glaz B, Yeater KM (eds) (2018) Applied statistics in agricultural, biological, and environmental sciences. Am Soc Agron, Soil Sci Soc Am, Crop Sci Soc Am, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  25. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press Inc., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  26. Goovaerts P (1999) Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89:1–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gorman RP, Sejnowski TJ (1988) Analysis of hidden units in a layered network to classify sonar targets. Neural Netw 1:75–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gringarten E, Deutsch CV (2001) Teacher’s aide, variogram interpretation and modeling. Math Geol 33:507–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Guan Y, Sherman M, Calvin JA (2004) A nonparametric test for spatial isotropy using subsampling. J Am Stat Assoc 99:810–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guedes LPC, Uribe-Opazo MA, Johann JA, Souza EG (2008) Anisotropia no estudo da variabilidade espacial de algumas variáveis químicas do solo. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 32:2217–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guedes LPC, Uribe-Opazo MA, Ribeiro Junior PJ (2013) Influence of incorporating geometric anisotropy on the construction of thematic maps of simulated data and chemical attributes of soil. Chil J Agric Res 73:414–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta SC, Larson WE (1979) Estimating soil water characteristic from particle size distribution, organic matter percent, and bulk density. Water Resour Res 15:1633–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gusella V (1991) Estimation of extreme winds from short-term records. J Struct Eng 117:375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2016) The elements of statistical learning: data, mining, inference, and prediction, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  35. Haykin S (1999) Neural networks – a comprehensive foundation, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  36. Hodnett MG, Tomasella J (2002) Marked differences between van Genuchten soil water-retention parameters for temperate and tropical soils: a new water-retention pedotransfer function developed for tropical soils. Geoderma 108:155–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hui S, Wendroth O, Parlange MB, Nielsen DR (1998) Soil variability – infiltration relationships of agroecosystems. J Balkan Ecol 1:21–40Google Scholar
  38. Hutchinson JM (1994) A radial basis function approach to financial time series analysis. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  39. Imam B, Sorooshian S, Mayr T, Schaap MG, Wösten JHM, Scholes RJ (1999) Comparison of pedotransfer functions to compute water holding capacity using the van Genuchten model in inorganic soils. IGBP-DIS Report, ToulouseGoogle Scholar
  40. Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) Applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  41. Janik LJ, Skjemstad JO, Raven MD (1995) Characterization and analysis of soils using midinfrared partial least squares. I. Correlations with XRF-determined major element composition. Aust J Soil Res 33:621–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jeffrey A (2010) Matrix operations for engineers and scientists: an essential guide in linear algebra. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Journel AG, Huijbregts CHJ (1978) Mining geoestatistics. Academic Press Inc., New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  44. Journel AG, Rao SE (1996) Deriving conditional distributions from ordinary kriging. Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  45. Jury WA, Horton R (2004) Soil physics, 6th edn. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  46. Kern JS (1995) Evaluation of soil water retention models based on basic soil physical properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:1134–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leij FJ, Schaap MG, Arya MP (2002) Indirect methods. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis: Part 4, Physical methods, 3rd edn. Soil Science Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1009–1045Google Scholar
  48. Lippmann RP (1989) Review of neural networks for speech recognition. Neural Comput 1:1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marques RFPV, Mello CR, Silva AM, Franco CS, Oliveira AS (2014) Performance of the probability distribution models applied to heavy rainfall daily events. Cienc Agrotec 38:335–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matheron G (1963) Principles of geostatistics. Econ Geol 58:1246–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McBratney AB, Minasny B, Cattle SR, Vervoort RW (2002) From pedotransfer functions to soil inference systems. Geoderma 109:41–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Minasny B, McBratney AB, Mendonça-Santos ML, Santos HG (2003) Revisão sobre funções de pedotransferência (PTFs) e novos métodos de predição de classes e atributos do solo. Embrapa Solos, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  53. Montgomery DC, Runger GC (1994) Applied statistics and probability for engineers. John Wiley & Sons Inc., Crawfordsville, INGoogle Scholar
  54. Murshed MS, Seob YA, Parkc J-S, Lee Y (2018) Use of beta-P distribution for modeling hydrologic events. Commun Statist Appl Meth 25:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nebel ALC, Timm LC, Cornelis WM, Gabriels D, Reichardt K, Aquino LS, Pauletto EA, Reinert DJ (2010) Pedotransfer functions related to spatial variability of water retention attributes for lowland soils. Braz J Soil Sci 34:669–680Google Scholar
  56. Nemes A, Schaap MG, Wösten JHM (2003) Functional evaluation of pedotransfer functions derived from different scales of data collection. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1093–1102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner MH (1990) Applied linear statistical models, 3rd edn. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, ILGoogle Scholar
  58. Nielsen DR, Wendroth O (2003) Spatial and temporal statistics – sampling field soils and their vegetation. Catena Verlag, Cremlingen-DesdedtGoogle Scholar
  59. Oliveira LB, Ribeiro MR, Jacomine PKT, Rodrigues JVV, Marques FA (2002) Funções de Pedotransferência para predição da umidade retida a potenciais específicos em solos do Estado de Pernambuco. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 26:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ (eds) (2004) Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  61. Pachepsky Y, Timlin D, Varallyay G (1996) Artificial neural networks to estimate soil water retention from easily measurable data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:727–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pachepsky YA, Timlin DJ, Ahuja LR (1999a) The current status of pedotransfer functions: their accuracy, reliability and utility in field and regional scale modeling. In: Corwin DL, Loage K, Ells-Worth TR (eds) Assessment of non-point source pollution in vadose zone. American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp 223–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pachepsky YA, Timlin DJ, Ahuja LR (1999b) Estimated saturated soil hydraulic conductivity using water retention data and neural networks. Soil Sci 164:552–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ, Lin HS (2006) Hydropedology and pedotransfer functions. Geoderma 131:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Parfitt JMB, Timm LC, Pauletto EA, Sousa RO, Castilhos DD, Ávila CL, Reckziegel NL (2009) Spatial variability of the chemical, physical and biological properties in lowland cultivated with irrigated rice. Braz J Soil Sci 33:819–830Google Scholar
  66. Parfitt JMB, Timm LC, Reichardt K, Pinto LFS, Pauletto EA, Castilhos DD (2013) Chemical and biological attributes of a lowland soil affected by land leveling. Pesq Agropec Bras 48:1489–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Parfitt JMB, Timm LC, Reichardt K, Pauletto EA (2014) Impacts of land levelling on lowland soil physical properties. Braz J Soil Sci 38:315–326Google Scholar
  68. Radcliffe DE, Simunek J (2010) Soil physics with Hydrus: modeling and applications. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  69. Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Saxton KE (1982) Estimation of soil water properties. Trans ASAE 25:1316–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rawls WJ, Gish TJ, Brakensiek DL (1991) Estimating soil water retention from soil physical properties and characteristics. Adv Soil Sci 16:213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
  72. Reichardt K, Vieira SR, Libardi PL (1986) Variabilidade espacial de solos e experimentação de campo. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 10:1–6Google Scholar
  73. Robertson GP (2008) GS: geostatistics for the environmental sciences. Gamma Design Software, Plainwell, MIGoogle Scholar
  74. Schaap MG, Bouten W (1996) Modeling water retention curves of sandy soils using neural networks. Water Resour Res 32:3033–3040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schaap MG, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MT (1998) Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:847–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schaap MG, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MT (2001) ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. J Hydrol 251:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Shumway RH (1988) Applied statistical time series analyses. Prentice Halll, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar
  78. Shumway RH, Stoffer DS (2017) Time series analysis and its applications with R examples, 4th edn. Springer, New York, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Si BC (2008) Spatial scaling analyses of soil physical properties: a review of spectral and wavelet methods. Vadose Zone J 7:547–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Silva AP, Tormena CA, Fidalski J, Imhoff S (2008) Funções de pedotransferência para as curvas de retenção de água e de resistência do solo à penetração. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo 32:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Silva AC, Armindo RA, Brito AS, Schaap MG (2017) An assessment of pedotransfer function performance for the estimation of spatial variability of key soil hydraulic properties. Vadose Zone J 16:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Studenmund AH (1992) Using econometrics: a practical guide. Harper Collins, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  83. Tamari S, Wösten JHM, Ruiz-Suárez JC (1996) Testing an artificial neural network for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60:771–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tietje O, Hennings V (1996) Accuracy of the saturated hydraulic conductivity prediction by pedotransfer functions compared to the variability within FAO textural classes. Geoderma 69:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tietje O, Tapkenhinrichs M (1993) Evaluation of pedotransfer functions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1088–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Timm LC, Gomes DT, Barbosa EP, Reichardt K, Souza MD, Dynia JF (2006) Neural network and state-space models for studying relationships among soil properties. Sci Agric 63:386–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tomasella J, Hodnett MG (1998) Estimating soil water characteristics from limited data in Brazilian Amazonia. Soil Sci 163:190–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Tomasella J, Hodnett MG (2004) Pedotransfer functions for tropical soils. In: Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ (eds) Development of pedotransfer functions in soil hydrology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 415–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Tomasella J, Hodnett MG, Rossato L (2000) Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of soil water retention in Brazilian soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Trangmar BB, Yost RS, Uehara G (1985) Application of geostatistics to spatial studies of soil properties. Adv Agron 38:45–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van Den Berg M, Klamt E, Van Reeuwijk LP, Sombroek WG (1997) Pedotransfer functions for the estimation of moisture retention characteristics of Ferralsols and related soils. Geoderma 78:161–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the conductivity of un-saturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Van Looy K, Bouma J, Herbst M et al (2017) Pedotransfer functions in Earth system science: challenges and perspectives. Rev Geophys 55:1199–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vereecken H, Weynants M, Javaux M, Pachepsky Y, Schaap MG, Van Genuchten MT (2010) Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem soil hydraulic properties: a review. Vadose Zone J 9:795–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Vieira SR, Hatfield JL, Nielsen DR, Biggar JW (1983) Geostatistical theory and application to variability of some agronomical properties. Hilgardia 51:1–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vieira SR, Tillotson PM, Biggar JW, Nielsen DR (1997) Scaling of semivariograms and the kriging estimation of field-measured properties. Braz J Soil Sci 21:525–533Google Scholar
  97. Vieira SR, Grego CR, Topp GC, Reynolds WD (2014) Spatial relationships between soil water content and hydraulic conductivity in a highly structured clay soils. In: Teixeira WG, Ceddia MB, Ottoni MV, Donnagema GK (eds) Application of Soil Physics in Environmental Analysis: measuring, modeling and data integration. Springer, New York, NY, pp 75–90Google Scholar
  98. Wagner B, Tarnawski VR, Hennings V, Müller U, Wessolek G, Plagge R (2001) Evaluation of pedotransfer functions for unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity using an independent data set. Geoderma 102:275–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Warner B, Misra M (1996) Understanding neural networks as statistical tools. Am Statist 50:284–293Google Scholar
  100. Webster R (2001) Statistics to support soil research and their presentation. Eur J Soil Sci 52:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wendroth O, Reynolds WD, Vieira SR, Reichardt K, Wirth S (1997) Statistical approaches to the analysis of soil quality data. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil quality for crop production and ecosystem health. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 247–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. West M, Harrison J (1997) Bayesian forecasting and dynamic models, 2nd edn. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  104. Wilding LP, Drees LR (1983) Spatial variability and pedology. In: Wilding LP, Smeck NE, Hall GF (eds) Pedogenesis and soil taxonomy: concepts and interactions. Elsevier, New York, NY, pp 83–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wösten JHM (1997) Pedotransfer functions to evaluate soil quality. In: Gregorich EG, Carter MR (eds) Soil quality for crop production and ecosystem health. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 221–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wösten JHM, Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ (2001) Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. J Hydrol 251:123–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zimmerman D (1993) Another look at anisotropy in geostatistics. Math Geol 25:453–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Reichardt
    • 1
  • Luís Carlos Timm
    • 2
  1. 1.Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura and Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiróz”University of Sao PauloPiracicabaBrazil
  2. 2.Rural Engineering Department, Faculty of AgronomyFederal University of PelotasCapão do LeãoBrazil

Personalised recommendations