Advertisement

Ethnicity and Other Demographics Associated with Perceived Police Fairness

  • S. Hakan Can
Chapter

Abstract

Past research suggests that ethnicity influences perceptions of the fairness and legality of police action. However, most studies focused on Black and White individuals with less attention to Hispanics, most studies did not control for other demographics, and most studies gave no consideration for differences according to region of the United States. The present study examines how perceptions of police fairness in home and vehicle searches differ according to ethnicity (Black, White, Hispanic), while controlling for other demographics (gender, age, income, prior legal experience), with separate analyses for individuals from the Southwest (Texas) and the Northwest (Pennsylvania). Participants included 334 Texas university students and 643 Pennsylvania university students who completed anonymous surveys to provide demographics and to rate how “reasonable and therefore legal” were eight home search cases and seven vehicle search cases reviewed by the Supreme Court. T-tests revealed that the two regions were similar in perceived police fairness for home searches, but Texas individuals perceived more police fairness in vehicle searches. ANCOVAs conducted separately by region revealed that White individuals perceived more police fairness in both home and vehicle searches than did Black or Hispanic individuals, but only in Pennsylvania. Additionally, more police fairness was reported by individuals who were older (in Pennsylvania), with more income (in Pennsylvania), and with more prior legal experience (in Texas). Present results suggest that ethnicity may not be the primary demographic associated with perceptions of police fairness, with learned personal and regional experiences just as important as predictors.

Keywords

Perceptions of police Police fairness Police-community relations Search legality 

References

  1. Alpert, G. P., MacDonald, J., & Dunham, R. G. (2005). Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology, 43(2), 407–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayley, D., & Mendelsohn, H. (1969). Minorities and the police: Confrontation in America. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. (1958). Ethnicity prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borooah, V. K. (2011). Racial disparity in police stop and searches in England and Whales. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunson, R. K., & Miller, J. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 613–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckler, K., Unnever, J. D., & Cohen, F. T. (2008). Perceptions of injustice revisited: A test of Hagan et al.’s comparative conflict theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 31(1), 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao, L., & Garcia, V. (2005). Ethnicity and satisfaction with the police in a small city. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durán, R. J. (2009). Legitimated oppression: Inner-city Mexican American experiences with police gang enforcement. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38(2), 143–168.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241607313057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engel, R. S. (2008). A critique of the outcome test in racial profiling research. Justice Quarterly, 25(136), 22.Google Scholar
  10. Engel, R. S., & Calnon, J. M. (2004). Comparing benchmark technologies for policecitizen contacts: Traffic stop data collection for the Pennsylvania state police. Police Quarterly, 7, 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engel, R. S., & Johnson, R. (2006). Toward a better understanding of racial and ethnic disparities in search and seizure rates. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Franklin, T. W. (2010). The intersection of defendants’ ethnicity, gender, and age in prosecutorial decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(2), 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagan, J., Payne, M. R., & Shedd, C. (2005). Ethnicity, ethnicity, and youth perceptions of injustice. American Sociological Review, 70, 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Howell, S., Perry, H., & Vile, M. (2004). Black cities, white cities: Evaluating the police. Political Behavior, 26, 4568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huddleston, K. (2016). Border checkpoints and substantive due process: Abortion rights in the border zone. Yale Law Journal, 125(6), 1744–1756.Google Scholar
  16. Hurst, Y., Frank, J., & Browning, S. (2000). The attitudes of juveniles toward the police. Policing, 23, 3753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kent, S. L., & Jacobs, D. (2005). Minority threat and police strength from 1980 to 2000: A fixedeffects analysis of nonlinear and interactive effects in large cities. Criminology, 43(3), 731–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kessler, D. K. (2009). Free to leave? An empirical look at the fourth Amendment’s seizure standard. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99(1), 51–87.Google Scholar
  19. Klahm, C. F., Papp, J., & Rubino, L. (2016). Police shootings in black and white: Exploring newspaper coverage of officer-involved shootings. Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, 21, 197–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mast, M. S. (2004). Men are hierarchal, women are egalitarian: An implicit gender stereotype. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murty, K., Roebuck, J., & Smith, J. (1990). The image of the police in black Atlanta communities. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 250–257.Google Scholar
  22. Nicholson-Crotty, S., Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Fernandez, S. (2017). Will more black cops matter? Officer race and police-involved homicides of black citizens. Public Administration Review, 77(2), 206–216.  https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017). A bird’s eye view of civilians killed by police in 2015. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 309–340.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Piquero, N. L. (2012). The only thing we have to fear is fear itself: Investigating the relationship between fear of falling and white collar crime. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Task force report: The police. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  26. Rojek, J., Rosenfeld, R., & Decker, S. (2012). Policing ethnicity: The racial stratification of searches in police traffic stops. Criminology, 50(4), 993–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossi, P. H., & Anderson, A. B. (1982). The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgments (p. 1567). Beverly Hills: SAGE.Google Scholar
  28. Sadler, M. S., Correll, J., Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (2012). The world is not black and white: Racial bias in the decision to shoot in a multiethnic context. Journal of Social Issues, 68(2), 286–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01749.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schuck, A. M., & Rosenbaum, D. P. (2005). Global and neighborhood attitudes toward the police: Differentiation by ethnicity and type of contact. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(4), 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, B. W., & Holmes, M. (2003). Community accountability, minority threat, and police brutality: An examination of civil rights criminal complaints. Criminology, 41(4), 1035–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Ethnicity, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40(2), 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Weitzer, R., Tuch, S. A., & Skogan, W. A. (2008). Police-community relations in a majority black city. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(4), 398–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Hakan Can
    • 1
  1. 1.Penn State UniversitySchuylkillUSA

Personalised recommendations