Advertisement

Quotation With and Without Quotation Marks

  • Alessandro Capone
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology book series (PEPRPHPS, volume 22)

Abstract

This chapter presents a purely pragmatic account of quotation and argues that it is able to accommodate all relevant linguistic phenomena. Given that it is more parsimonious to explain the data only by reference to pragmatic principles than to explain them by reference to both pragmatic and semantic principles, as is common in the literature, I conclude that the account of quotation I present is preferrable to the more standard accounts. Alternative theories of quotation are treated in an intellectually honest way.

Keywords

Theories of quotation Pragmatics Explicatures Cancellability of explicatures Modularity of mind Modularity and pragmatics Language games 

References

  1. Bennett, Jonathan (1988). Quotation. Noûs 22/3, 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burton-Roberts, Noel (2005). Robyn Carston on semantics, pragmatics, and ‘encoding’. Journal of Linguistics 41, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton-Roberts, N. (2006).“Cancellation and intention”. Newcastle University, School of English, Mn. Newcastle working papers in linguistics. To appear in E. Romero & B. Soria (eds.).2010. Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Capone, Alessandro. 2003. On Grice’s circle. RASK: International Journal of Language and Communication 19: 3–32.Google Scholar
  5. Capone, Alessandro (2005). Pragmemes. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1355–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capone, Alessandro (2006). On Grice’s circle. Journal of Pragmatics 38, 645–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Capone, Alessandro (2009). Are explicatures cancellable? Intercultural Pragmatics 6/1, 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Capone, Alessandro (2010a). “Between Scylla and Charybdis”: The semantics and pragmatics of attitudes “de se”. Intercultural Pragmatics 7/3 (2010), 471–503.Google Scholar
  9. Capone, Alessandro (2010b). What can modularity of mind tell us about the semantics/pragmatics debate. Australian Journal of Linguistics 30/4, 497–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capone, Alessandro (Ed.) (2010c). Pragmemes. Special issue, Journal of Pragmatics 42.Google Scholar
  11. Capone, A. (2011a). Default semantics and the architecture of the mind. Journal of Pragmatics 43, 1741–1754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Capone, A. (2011b). The attributive/referential distinction, pragmatics, modularity of mind and modularization. Australian Journal of Linguistics 31/2, 153–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie (1997). Varieties of quotation. Mind 106/423, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie (1999). Reply to Saka. Mind 108, 741–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie (2005). Varieties of quotation revisited. Belgian Journal of Philosophy 17, 51–76.Google Scholar
  16. Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie (2007). Language turned on itself. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cappelen, Herman & Lepore, Ernie (2009). Quotation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/quotation/
  18. Carston, Robyn (1996). The architecture of the mind: modularity and modularization. In: Green, D. (Ed.), Cognitive Science: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell. 58–83.Google Scholar
  19. Carston, Robyn (2010). Explicit communication and ‘free’ pragmatic enrichment. In: Soria, B., Romero, E. (eds.). Explicit communication. Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  20. Church, Alonso (1956). Introduction to mathematical logic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cummings, Louise (2009). Clinical Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davidson, David (1984). Quotation. In: Davidson, D. (ed). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 79–92.Google Scholar
  23. Douven, Igor. 2010. The pragmatics of belief. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (1):35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frege, Gottlob (1892). On sense and reference. In: Black, M. and Geach, P. (eds), Philosophical Writings. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel (1994). Ostensive signs: against the identity theory of quotation. The Journal of Philosophy 91/5, 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geach, P.T. (1950). On names of expressions. Mind 59/235, 388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geurts, Bart and Maier, Emar (2005). Quotation in context. In: Philippe de Brabanter (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. Benjamins, Amsterdam. 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goddard, L. & Routley, R. (1966). Use, mention and quotation. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 44/1, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of Talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Gómez-Torrente, Mario (2001). Quotation revisited. Philosophical Studies 102, 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Ma, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Huang, Yan (2007). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jaszczolt, Katarzyna (2005). Default semantics. Foundations of a compositional theory of acts of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/default-semantics-9780199261987?cc=it&lang=en&#
  34. Kasher, Asa (1991). On the pragmatic modules. Journal of Pragmatics 16, 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levinson, Stephen (2000). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nunberg, Geoff (1993). Indexicality and deixis. Linguistics & Philosophy 16, 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parsons, Terence (1982). What do quotation marks name? Frege’s theories of quotations and that-clauses. Philosophical Studies 42, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Predelli, Stefano (2003). Scare quotes and their relation to other semantic issues. Linguistics & Philosophy 26, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quine, Willard Van Orman (1940). Mathematical Logic, 3d ed. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Quine, Willard Van Orman (1964). Word and object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Recanati, F. (2001). Open quotation. Mind 110, 637–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Recanati, F. (2008). Open quotation revisited. Philosophical Perspectives 22, 443–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Recanati, F. (2010). Truth-conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reimer, Marga (1996). Quotation marks: demonstratives or demonstrations? Analysis 56, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richard, Mark (1986). Quotation, grammar, and opacity. Linguistics & Philosophy 9, 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saka, Paul (1998). Quotation and the use-mention distinction. Mind 107/425, 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saka, Paul (1999). Quotation: a reply to Cappelen and Lepore. Mind 108, 751–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saka, Paul (2005). Quotational constructions. In: P. De Brabanter (ed.), Hybrid Quotations. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 187–212.Google Scholar
  50. Saka, Paul (2006). The demonstrative and identity theories of quotation. Journal of Philosophy 103 (9), 452–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saka, Paul (2011). The act of quotation. In: E. Brendal, J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach (Eds.), Understanding quotation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 303–22.Google Scholar
  52. Sorensen, Roy (2008). Empty quotation. Analysis 68/297, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre (1981). Irony and the use-mention distinction. In: Cole, P. (Ed). Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic, 295–318.Google Scholar
  54. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. (2nd edn. reprinted in 1995). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language 17, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tarski, Alfred (1933). The concept of truth in formalized languages. In Tarski, A., Woodger, J.H. (Eds), Logic, semantics and metamathematics, New York: Oxford, OUP, 152–278.Google Scholar
  57. Washington, Corey (1992). The identity theory of quotation. Journal of Philosophy 89/11, 582–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilson, Deirdre (2000). Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In Sperber, D. (Ed.). Metarepresentations: a multidisciplinary perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 411–448.Google Scholar
  59. Wilson, Deirdre (2005). New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 105, 1129–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson, Deirdre, Sperber, Dan (1992). On verbal irony. Lingua 87, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Capone
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations