What Happens When We Report Grammatical, Lexical and Morphological Errors?
In this chapter I expatiate on what happens when one has to indirectly report ungrammatical utterances. How can the issue of grammatical, lexical and morphological errors affect our understanding of the practice of indirect reporting? What kind of problems are generated by such issues? The general practice seems to be to ignore or edit errors, when indirectly reporting them, concentrating on content. However, there are cases in which this practice is unsatisfactory and in which reporting has to resort to mixed quotation. Grammatical and morphological errors lead us to some paradoxes about indirect reporting (one of these being that sometimes it is impossible to provide an indirect report without resorting to mixed quotation) and, furthermore, lead us to revise the general considerations concerning the praxis of indirect reporting.
- Bonami, Olivier, Godard, Daniele (2008). On the syntax of direct quotation in French. In R. Bauerle, U. Reyle, E. Zimmerman, eds. Presuppositions and discourse: essays offered to Hans Kamp. Oxford, Elsevier, 65–99.Google Scholar
- Capone, Alessandro (2010b). Between Scylla and Charibdis: The semantics and pragmatics of attitudes ‘de se’. Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (3):471–503.
- Capone, Alessandro (2013). The pragmatics of indirect reports and slurring. In A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, M. Carapezza, eds. Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics. Dordrecht, Springer, 152–184.Google Scholar
- Capone, Alessandro (2017). On the tension between semantics and pragmatics. In K. Allan, A. Capone, I. Kecskes, eds. Pragmemes and theories of language use. Dordrecht, Springer.Google Scholar
- Capone, Alessandro, Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan (2014). On indirect reports and language games: Evidence from Persian. RIFL (Rivista Italiana di Filosofia del Linguaggio) 2, 26–42.Google Scholar
- Cappelen, Herman, Lepore, Ernie (2005). Liberating content. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
- Castañeda, Hector-Neri (1966). “‘He’: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness”. Ratio 8: pp. 130–157.Google Scholar
- Cummings, Louise (2016). Reported speech: a clinical pragmatic perspectives. In A. Capone, F. Kiefer, F. Lo Piparo, eds. Indirect reports and pragmatics. Cham, Springer.Google Scholar
- Devitt, Michael (1996). Coming to our senses. Cambridge, CUP.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, Raymond (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge, CUP.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
- Goldberg, Sanford (2015). Assertion. On the philosophical significance of assertoric speech. Oxford, OUP.Google Scholar
- Higginbotham, James (2003). “Remembering, Imagining, and the First Person.” In Alex Barber (ed.), Epistemology of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 496–533.Google Scholar
- Mey, Jacob. 2001. Pragmatics. Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, D. (2003). Unity of consciousness and the self. Meeting of the Aristotelian Society, pp. 325-352.Google Scholar
- Volosinov, V. N. (1971). Reported speech. In L. Matejka & K. Promorska (Eds.), Readings in Russian poetry.Google Scholar
- Wong, Jock (2010). The triple articulation of language. In A. Capone, ed. Pragmemes. Journal of Pragmatics 42/11, 2932–2944.Google Scholar