Advertisement

The Design of Walking Sticks: Use, Manufacturing and Abandonment

  • Rebeca Coutinho CabralEmail author
  • João Carlos Lutz Barbosa
  • Luiza Helena Boueri Rebello
  • Renata Vilanova
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 972)

Abstract

This article studies the history of walking sticks, the consequences of the negative stigma around it and explores how it can be redesign to serve people nowadays and help them to have a better posture, movement and occupy the space that belongs to them too. In order to develop a product better for their users, ergonomic problem were used in order to find the gap the products available leaves and to notice how the users handle the product. Meanwhile a investigation is made with the user, family and a team of physiotherapist focusing on how the user feels about the product and about being seen using it. With those points considered it was created an alternative for a new design that reduces the double gait support during the swing phase. It is also aesthetically pleasing, drawing attention to it by the design making the owner feels proud of using it.

Keywords

Assistive technology Aging and gerontology Walking sticks Emotional design 

References

  1. 1.
    Dias, RBM.: Avaliação dos fatores de riscos intrínsecos de quedas em idosos institucionalizados. UPF, Passo Fundo (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Perracini, M.R., Ramos, L.R.: Fatores associados a quedas em uma coorte de idosos residentes na comunidade. Revista de Saúde Pública. 36, 709–716 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tinetti, M.E.: Preventing falls in elderly persons. New Engl. J. Med. 348, 42–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glisoi, S.F.N., Ansai, J.H., Silva, T.O.D., Ferreira, F.P.C., Soares, A.T., Cabral, K.D.N., Sera, C.T.N., Paschoal, Sérgio: Dispositivos auxiliares de marcha: orientação quanto ao uso, adequação e prevenção de quedas em idosos. Geriatr. Gerontol. Aging 6, 261–272 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zaina, G.A.: Muleta Instrumentada com sistema de biofeedback para treinamento de pacientes. USP, São Carlos (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Goffman, E.: Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Prentice-Hill, Upper Saddle River (1963)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Phillips, B., Zhao, H.: Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technol. 5, 36–45 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Norman, D.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moraes, A.D., Mont’Alvão, C.: Ergonomia: conceitos e aplicações. 2AB, Rio de Janeiro (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panero, J., Zelnik, M.: Dimensionamento humano para espaços interiores: um livro de consulta e referência para projetos. Gustavo Gili, São Paulo (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boiani, J.A.M., Ferreira, A.C.M., Junior, G.B., Paschoarelli, L.C., Medola, F.O.: Prescrição e uso de andadores para idosos: Uma demanda para o design ergonômico. In: Anais do 15o ERGODESIGN USIHC, pp. 585–597. Editora Edgard Blücher, Recife, Brasil (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebeca Coutinho Cabral
    • 1
    Email author
  • João Carlos Lutz Barbosa
    • 1
  • Luiza Helena Boueri Rebello
    • 1
  • Renata Vilanova
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFFNiteróiBrazil

Personalised recommendations