Advertisement

Assistive Technologies for Elderly – Review on Recent Developments in Lower Limb and Back Pain Management

  • Murali SubramaniyamEmail author
  • Kishore Kumar
  • Dinesh Shanmugam
  • Dong Joon Kim
  • Kyung-Sun Lee
  • Se Jin Park
  • Seung Nam MinEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 972)

Abstract

Population aging is inevitable in India that results in an overall increase in the ageing society. The number of elderly in India is projected to reach 173 million in 2026. It is projected that the proportion of Indians aged 60 and older will rise from 8.6% in 2011 to 11.1% in 2025. Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common problems in the elderly population. Ageing also leads to numerous problems like disabilities in the lower limb, back pain, arthritis, stroke, brain injury, muscular dystrophy, and so on. Muscular dystrophy is the main reason for old age disability caused by more than 30 muscle disorders where loss of muscular strength, and fat redistribution decreasing the ability of the tissues to carry out their normal functions. Many treatments methods have been deployed to help them in which rehabilitation plays a significant role. In spite of the benefits derived from the use of assistive technologies, some parts of the world have insignificant or no access to these technologies. This study purpose is to briefly review recent progress in assistive technologies, more specifically on recent development in lower limbs and back pain management. Multiple databases were searched for English literature and limiting to last ten years. The keywords selected for the search were a combination of the elderly, exoskeleton, lower limb, back pain, arthritis, and assistive technologies. The search results suggested that assistive technologies for the elderly population have received some attention from researchers also indicate the need for a comprehensive and low-cost approach to increase the availability of assistive technologies for the elderly community.

Keywords

Assistive technology Exoskeleton Lower limb Pain management 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by the National Research Foundation of South Korea, Project No. NRF2017R1D1A3B03034037.

References

  1. 1.
    Park, S.J., Subramaniyam, M., Kim, S.E., Hong, S., Lee, J.H., Jo, C.M.: Older driver’s physiological response under risky driving conditions—overtaking, unprotected left turn. In: Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling and Simulation, pp. 107–114. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    United National Population Fund: Caring for Our Elders: Early Responses – India Ageing Report. UNFPA, New Delhi, India (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Census of India, Office of the Registrar General and the Census Commissioner of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India (2011). http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-common/census_2011.html
  4. 4.
    Velayutham, B., Kangusamy, B., Joshua, V., Mehendale, S.: The prevalence of disability in elderly in India-Analysis of 2011 census data. Disabil. Health J. 9, 584–592 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Majumder, S., Aghayi, E., Noferesti, M., Memarzadeh-Tehran, H., Mondal, T., Pang, Z., Deen, M.: Smart homes for elderly healthcare—recent advances and research challenges. Sensors 17, 2496 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baek, E., Song, S.K., Oh, S., Mohammed, S., Jeon, D., Kong, K.: A generalized control framework of assistive controllers for lower limb exoskeletons. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1505–1509 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murray, S.A., Ha, K.H., Hartigan, C., Goldfarb, M.: An assistive control approach for a lower-limb exoskeleton to facilitate recovery of walking following stroke. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 23, 441–449 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ortlieb, A., Bouri, M., Baud, R., Bleuler, H.: An assistive lower limb exoskeleton for people with neurological gait disorders. In: IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 441–446 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banchadit, W., Temram, A., Sukwan, T., Owatchaiyapong, P., Suthakorn, J.: Design and implementation of a new motorized-mechanical exoskeleton based on CGA Patternized Control. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2012 - Conference Digest, vol. 2, pp. 1668–1673 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shen, B., Wang, S.: An independent life support robot for the lower-limb handicapped and elderly: task-intention-identification and assistive-motion-planning algorithms. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, IEEE-ROBIO 2015, pp. 1169–1176 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chugo, D., Yamada, T., Muramatsu, S., Yokota, S., Hashimoto, H.: Assistive robot for standing with physical activity estimation based on muscle arrangements of human legs overview of proposed estimation. In: 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO), vol. 02, pp. 35–43 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ciuccarelli, L., Freddi, A., Longhi, S., Monteriu, A., Ortenzi, D., Pagnotta, D.P.: Cooperative robots architecture for an assistive scenario. In: 2018 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC), pp. 128–129 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yue, C., Cheng, H., Chen, Y., Deng, Q., Lin, X.: Design of a wearable sensing system for a lower extremity exoskeleton. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, ICMA 2017, pp. 464–468 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yu, Y., Liang, W.: Design optimization for lower limb assistive mechanism based on Manipulability Inclusive Principle. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, ROBIO 2012 - Conference Digest, pp. 174–180 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hari Krishnan, R., Pugazhenthi, S.: Development of a self-transfer robotic facility for elderly and disabled. In: Proceedings of 2015 International Conference on Robotics, Automation, Control and Embedded Systems, RACE 2015, pp. 1–4 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rathore, A., Wilcox, M., Ramirez, D.Z.M., Loureiro, R., Carlson, T.: Quantifying the human-robot interaction forces between a lower limb exoskeleton and healthy users. In: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS, pp. 586–589 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Garate, V.R., Parri, A., Yan, T., Munih, M., Lova, R.M., Vitiello, N., Ronsse, R.: Motor primitive-based control for lower-limb exoskeletons. In: 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob), 26 June 2016, pp. 655–661. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di, P., Huang, J., Sekiyama, K., He, S., Nakagawa, S., Chen, F., Fukuda, T.: Optimal posture control for stability of intelligent cane robot. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 725–730 (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen, Y.F., Napoli, D., Agrawal, S.K., Zanotto, D.: Smart crutches: towards instrumented crutches for rehabilitation and exoskeletons-assisted walking. In: Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 193–198 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thakur, C., Ogawa, K., Tsuji, T., Kurita, Y.: Soft wearable augmented walking suit with pneumatic gel muscles and stance phase detection system to assist gait. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 3, 1 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ikeya, Y., Nakakuki, T.: A study on a waist power assist suit for a caregiver to prevent lower back pain. In: 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 20 October 2013, pp. 1455–1458. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bramhapurikar, K., Prabhune, A., Chavan, S., Chandra, G., Sengupta, J.: A wearable posture corrector device. In: 9th IEEE International Conference on Computing, Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), 10 July 2018, pp. 1–5, IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nguyen, S.M., Tanguy, P., Rémy-Néris, O.: Computational architecture of a robot coach for physical exercises in kinaesthetic rehabilitation. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 26 August 2016, pp. 1138–1143. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohno, A., Nabae, H., Suzumori K.: Static analysis of powered low-back orthosis driven by thin pneumatic artificial muscles considering body surface deformation. In: IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 11 December 2015, pp. 39–44. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Murali Subramaniyam
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kishore Kumar
    • 1
  • Dinesh Shanmugam
    • 1
  • Dong Joon Kim
    • 2
  • Kyung-Sun Lee
    • 3
  • Se Jin Park
    • 4
  • Seung Nam Min
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSRM Institute of Science and TechnologyKattankulathurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Management EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of Industrial HealthCatholic University of PusanBusanSouth Korea
  4. 4.Division of Convergence TechnologyKorea Research Institute of Standards and ScienceDaejeonSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of Drone and Industrial Safety EngineeringShinsung UniversityDangjinSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations