Advertisement

Application of Universal Design for Design Improvement of Hangers

  • Peng-Jyun LiuEmail author
  • Ching-yi Wang
  • Yi-Chun Hshieh
  • Lin-Chu Su
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 972)

Abstract

This study used the Universal Design method to explore the use of hangers and improve the design of hangers. The study was conducted in two phases. First, investigated the habits and problems of the use of hangers, as well as the situation of the force when using the hangers. Two new types of hangers were designed based on the survey results. Second, the new type of hangers designed as the stimulus samples were used to investigate the five senses of the user’s visual perception and post-use operational feelings. The design of the new-style hangers was adjusted according to the survey results, and a new type of hanger products was proposed. A product is based on user experience and general design principles.

Keywords

Universal design Hanger PPP evaluation questionnaire User experience 

References

  1. 1.
    Yu, H.-Y.: Love Universal Design - Design Concept Full of Love and Care. Block Culture Publishing Co., Ltd., Taipei (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu, H.-Y.: Research on the current situation of general design at home and abroad and the study of case application (unpublished master thesis). Practice University Design Institute, Taipei City (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zeng, S.-Y.: From “accessible design” to “universal design” - the change and development process of the barrier-free environment concept in the United States and Japan. Des. J. 8(2), 57–76 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakagawa, S.: Universal Design Textbook <Supplement Revised Edition> (trans: S.-C. Jhang). Longxi International Book Co. Ltd., Taipei (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norman, D.A.: Cognitive engineering. In: Norman, D.A., Draper, S.W. (eds.) User Centered System Design: New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norman, D.A., Lindsay, P.H.: Human information processing: an introduction to psychology. Am. J. Psychol. 110(4), 635–641 (1997, Winter).  https://doi.org/10.2307/1423414. JSTOR, an online journal archive made available to researchers through participating libraries and institutions. Subscription (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mirnig, A.G., Meschtscherjakov, A., Wurhofer, D., Meneweger, T., Tscheligi, M.: A formal analysis of the ISO 9241-210 definition of user experience. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2015, pp. 437–450 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2732511
  8. 8.
    Fukusawa, N.: Design in balance with environment and behavior. AXIS, Tok (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fukasawa, N.: Phaidon Press, U.S (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ashcraft, B.: Without Thought (2007). http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20070518/without-thought. Accessed 22 Dec 2011
  11. 11.
    Fang, J.-N.: Naoto: use it with intuition. Artist 371, 208–213 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books Inc., New York (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peng-Jyun Liu
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ching-yi Wang
    • 1
  • Yi-Chun Hshieh
    • 1
  • Lin-Chu Su
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Creative Product DesignAsia UniversityTaichungTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Institute of Applied ArtsNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations