Advertisement

Humanized Design of Interaction Interfaces for Small Screen Devices: Take Intelligent Lock as an Example

  • Na Lin
  • Zhongting Wang
  • Chaoyi ZhaoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 972)

Abstract

This paper summarizes the results of preliminary user tests with 3 intelligent lock interfaces as an example for application of small screens. 12 Volunteers (6 males and 6 females) from 20 to 60 years old (M = 35.00, SD = 10.45) were recruited to complete typical tasks of intelligent lock. The difference of subjective satisfaction scores were compared and analyzed. We concluded that the comprehensibility of terminologies and icons of function buttons presented on the interface, learnability of manipulation programs, and the accessibility and effectiveness of help and documentation all affected the results.

Keywords

Humanized interface design Intelligent lock Small screen devices 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the participants who took part in the experiment. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFF0206601, 2017YFF0206602) and China National Institute of Standardization’s President Fund Program (522018Y-5984).

References

  1. 1.
    Dunlop, M., Brewster, S.: The challenge of mobile devices for human computer interaction. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 6, 235–236 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nielsen, J.: Ten Usability Heuristics. [WWW]. http://useit.com/papers/heuristic. Accessed 25 Oct 2003
  3. 3.
    Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface, 3rd edn. Addison Wesley, Menlo Park (1998). 7(4), 1–1 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, X.: The Analysis of Usability in Interaction Design of Smart TV. Shandong Polytechnic University (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shneiderman, B.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th edn. Pearson, London (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Michalski, R., Grobelny, J., Karwowski, W.: The effects of graphical interface design characteristics on human–computer interaction task efficiency. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 36(11), 959–977 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, Q., Cui, L.X.: Reach of concreteness effects in semantic processing. J. Beijing Normal Univ. (Soc. Sci.) 4, 28–34 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J.: Event-related potentials and language comprehension. Electrophysiol. Mind 6, 171–220 (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nielsen, J.: Designing User Interfaces for International Use. Elsevier Publishing, Amsterdam (1990)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Bruijn, O., Spence, R., Chong, M.Y.: RSVP browser: web browsing on small screen devices. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 6(4), 245–252 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kantowitz, B., Sorkin, R.: Human Factors: Understanding People-System Relationships. Wiley, Hoboken (1983)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wickens, C.: Engineering Psychology and Human Performance, 2nd edn. HarperCollins, New York (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SAMR Key Laboratory of Human Factors and ErgonomicsBeijingChina
  2. 2.China National Institute of StandardizationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations