Advertisement

Building a House with a Limited Tool Set: Overcoming the Challenge of Incorporating Usability in the Acquisition Process

  • Jade DriggsEmail author
  • Alice Diggs
  • Dick Steinberg
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 972)

Abstract

Building software can be compared to building a house. The software product must start with defining requirements prior to writing the first line of code. Likewise, with building a home, a home buyer must approve a design with the architect, and work to establish the requirements before laying the first brick. Unfortunately, in the Department of Defense (DoD) acquisition process, the Government procurement organization is often limited in its ability to be an architect to promote a more usable product. The ability to influence design is often diminished to DoD standard compliance requirements, limiting the tools available to promote usability. To overcome this, we developed a process to better understand derived system requirements for a space asset command and control contract. We implemented a collaborative process between the Government and Developer teams, including the operational user to promote system usability. Positive design outcomes suggest utility in the process.

Keywords

Space Usability Design 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Department of Defense: Better buying power (acquisition, technology, and logistics). https://www.ustranscom.mil/dbw/docs/BBP_Fact_Sheet.pdf
  3. 3.
    Department of Defense: Defense standardization program – making systems work together (frequently asked questions). http://www.dsp.dla.mil/Policy-Guidance/FAQs/Data-Item-Descriptions/
  4. 4.
    Department of Defense: Implementation directive for better buying power 3.0 – achieving dominant capabilities through technical excellence and innovation. https://www.acq.osd.mil/fo/docs/betterBuyingPower3.0(9Apr15).pdf
  5. 5.
    Gawron, V.: Human Performance, Workload, and Situational Awareness Measures Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., McClelland, I.L., Weerdmeester, B.: Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, Bristol (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shackel, B., Richardson, S.J.: Usability-context, framework, definition, design and evaluation. In: Human Factors for Informatics Usability New York (1991)Google Scholar
  9. 9.

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.United States Air ForceColorado SpringsUSA
  2. 2.Raytheon IISSterlingUSA
  3. 3.Raytheon IDSHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations