Advertisement

Closing the Gap of Creating Design Concepts for DSS by Applying the Situation Awareness Oriented Design Principles

  • Elena DalingerEmail author
  • Daniel Feiser
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 972)

Abstract

Cognitive Systems Engineering (CSE) provides methods for system design, which base on the analysis of cognitive demands in the work domain. CSE methods are successfully used to design decision support for many domains, but they provide no guidance on how to develop design concepts after cognitive requirements are derived. By means of the Applied Cognitive Work Analysis (ACWA), a CSE methodology for the analysis and design of decision support systems, we show how Situation Awareness Oriented Design (SAOD) principles could support the definition of requirements for design. We applied the methodology to develop mobile systems for the support of fire brigade team leaders on board a vessel. The results show that using the guidance in form of SAOD principles can enrich the design process compared to the application of ACWA without this guidance.

Keywords

Cognitive systems engineering Situation Awareness Decision support systems Human-centered design Applied Cognitive Work Analysis Situation Awareness Oriented Design Human Machine Interface Maritime domain 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper describes the research that is a part of a project funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The authors would like to thank the staff members of the fire department of Wilhelmshaven (Germany) for their grateful assistance.

References

  1. 1.
    Rasmussen, J., Pejtersen, A.M., Goodstein, L.P.: Cognitive Systems Engineering. Wiley, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naikar, N., Hopcroft, R., Moylan, A.: Work domain analysis: theoretical concepts and methodology. Technical report (DSTO-TR-1665), Defence Science & Technology Organisation. Victoria, Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elm, W., Potter, S., Gualtieri, J., Roth, E., Easter, J.: Applied cognitive work analysis: a pragmatic methodology for designing revolutionary cognitive affordances. In: Hollnagel, E. (ed.) Handbook for Cognitive Task Design, pp. 357–382. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Endsley, M.R., Jones, D.G.: Designing for Situation Awareness: An Approach to Human-Centered Design. Taylor and Francis, London (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Potter, S., Gualtieri, J., Elm, W.: Case studies: applied cognitive work analysis in the design of innovative decision support. In: Hollnagel, E. (ed.) Handbook for Cognitive Task Design, pp. 653–678. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum. Factors 37(1), 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Endsley, M.R., Bolstad, C.A., Jones, D.G., Riley, J.M.: Situation awareness oriented design: from user’s cognitive requirements to creating effective supporting technologies. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 47, pp. 268–272 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dalinger, E., Ley, D.: A reference model for designing decision support systems in novel work domains. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2011, pp. 1615–1620 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dalinger, E.: A framework for design of an integrated system for decision support and training. In: Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, ECCE 2013. ACM, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vicente, K.J.: Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Hum. Factors 44, 62–78 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Woods, D.D.: Toward a theoretical base for representation design in the computer medium: ecological perception and aiding human cognition. In: Flach, J., Hancock, P., Caird, J., Vicente, K. (eds.) Global Perspectives on the Ecology of Human-Machine Systems, pp. 157–188. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roth, E.M., Malin, J.T., Schreckenghost, D.L.: Paradigms for intelligent interface design. In: Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K., Prabhu, P.V. (eds.) Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 1177–1201. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics FKIEWachtbergGermany

Personalised recommendations