Advertisement

The Impact of Binaural Beats on User Performance and Emotions Using a BCI for Robot Control

  • Lizette de WetEmail author
  • Louwrens Potgieter
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 972)

Abstract

This research was prompted by claims that certain sounds or music could increase learning abilities and performance. Binaural beating takes place when separate frequencies are introduced into each ear. The brain then strives to bridge the gap by creating a third tone. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of binaural beats on participants’ performance, excitement, engagement, meditation, and frustration while manipulating a robot with a brain-computer interface. Fifty participants were exposed to Alpha, Beta, Delta and Theta binaural tones that changed their dominant brainwaves while they were engaged in the task. A control (no tones) was also established. A mixed methods research design was applied using physiological testing, questionnaires, interviews and observation. The results indicated that different sound frequencies did indeed affect user performance. Sessions where no frequencies were applied (control) were associated with more errors and longer time durations compared to all the other frequencies.

Keywords

Usability User experience UX Binaural beats User emotions Brain-computer interface BCI 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G.: EEG-based communication: presence of an error potential. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111(12), 2138–2144 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wahbeh, H., Calabrese, C., Zwickey, H., Zajdel, D.: Binaural beat technology in humans: a pilot study to assess neuropsychologic, physiologic, and electroencephalographic effects. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 13(2), 199–206 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Olmstead, R.: Use of auditory and visual stimulation to improve cognitive abilities in learning-disabled children. J Neurother. 9(2), 49–61 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Budzynski, T., Jordy, J., Budzynski, H.K., Tang, H., Claypoole, K.: Academic performance enhancement with photic stimulation and EDR feedback. J. Neurother. 3(3–4), 11–21 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Le Scouarnec, R.P., Poirier, R.M., Owens, J.E., Gauthier, J., Taylor, A.G., Foresman, P.A.: Use of binaural beat tapes for treatment of anxiety: a pilot study of tape preference and outcomes. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 7(1), 58–63 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nomura, T., Higuchi, K., Yu, H.: Slow-wave photic stimulation relieves patient discomfort during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 21(1 Pt 1), 54–58 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noton, D.: Migraine and photic stimulation: report on a survey of migraineurs using flickering light therapy. Complement. Ther. Nurs. Midwifery 6(3), 138–142 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Galitz, W.O.: The Essential Guide to User Interface Design. Wiley, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Tan, D.S., Nijholt, A.: A Brain-Computer Interface (Applying our Minds to Human-Computer Interaction). Springer, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tractinsky, N.: The usability construct: a dead end? Hum.-Comput. Interact. 33(2), 1–47 (2017)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9241-11. https://www.iso.org/standard/16883.html
  19. 19.
    Tullis, T., Albert, B.: Measuring the User Experience. Elsevier/Morgan Kaufman, Burlington/Massachusetts (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 4th edn. Wiley, West Sussex (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    Gentle Awakening Program (GAP). http://www.gentleawakening.com/
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Keeley, P.: Stress-Proof Your Life. Infinity Publishing, United States (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
  32. 32.
    Gaus, W., Högel, J.: Balanced designs for multiple crossover studies. Arzneimittelforschung 42(2), 163–172 (1992)Google Scholar
  33. 33.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the Free StateBloemfonteinSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations