Advertisement

Sustainable Citizenship and the Prospect of Participation and Governance in the Digital Era

  • Valesca Lima
Chapter
Part of the Governance, Development, and Social Inclusion in Latin America book series (GDSILA)

Abstract

In this chapter, I reflect on the opportunities and challenges for the understanding of the relationship between political crisis and democratic innovations. I turn first to the challenge of exploring the alternative responses to constrained spaces of participation and for strengthening democratic innovations. I examine the incentives and mechanisms at play within governance structures, especially those that can be further explored by citizens, such as access to accurate information in the era of social media and fake news. Finally, I discuss some alternatives for citizen engagement by looking at the new conditions for participation. These alternatives involve the reframing of the political debate with popular mobilization and techno-democratic qualification. These elements combined might help citizens to engage in the defense of spaces of popular participation and collaborate to maintain the structures of participatory citizenship.

Keywords

Social media Resistance Social movements Citizen participation Technodemocracy 

Bibliography

  1. Abers, R. (2000). Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. The Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association, 31, 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre (1st ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bastos, M. T., & Mercea, D. (2017). The Brexit Botnet and User-Generated Hyperpartisan News. Social Science Computer Review.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439317734157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blasio, E. D., & Sorice, M. (2018). Populism Between Direct Democracy and the Technological Myth. Palgrave Communications, 4, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 29.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, J., Coll, K., Dagnino, E., & Neveu, C. (2014). Disputing Citizenship. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornwall, A. (2013). Spaces for Transformation? Reflections on Issues of Power and Difference in Participation in Development. In Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation (pp. 75–91). London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  9. Dalea, R., & Robertson, S. (2010). Interview with Boaventura de Sousa Santos. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2, 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1991). Governability. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality (pp. 73–102). UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  11. Fung, A. (2003). Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11, 338–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. Verso.Google Scholar
  13. Fung, A., Gilman, H. R., & Shkabatur, J. (2013). Six Models for the Internet + Politics. International Studies Review, 15, 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerbaudo, P. (2017). From Cyber-Autonomism to Cyber-Populism: An Ideological Analysis of the Evolution of Digital Activism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism and Critique, 1(15), 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giroux, H. A. (2010). Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy. Policy Futures in Education, 8, 715–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heller, P. (2001). Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre. Politics and Society, 29, 131–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2005). Relocating Participation Within a Radical Politics of Development. Development and Change, 36, 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Holston, J. (1999). Cities and Citizenship. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hsieh, J. (2013). Collective Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Identity-Based Movement of Plain Indigenous in Taiwan. Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hsieh, J. (2015). The Unseen Effectiveness of Social Movements and Protests. Mobilizing Ideas.Google Scholar
  22. Irazábal, C. (2008). Ordinary Places/Extraordinary Events: Citizenship, Democracy and Public Space in Latin America. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Katzenstein, D. S. (1998). Stepsisters: Feminist Movement Activist in Different Institutional Spaces. In The Social Movement Society: Contentious Politics for a New Century. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Mohan, G. (2006). Beyond Participation: Strategies for Deeper Empowerment. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? (pp. 153–167). London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  25. Morgan, S. (2018). Fake News, Disinformation, Manipulation and Online Tactics to Undermine Democracy. Journal of Cyber Policy, 3, 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peters, M. A. (2017). Education in a Post-Truth World. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 49, 563–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pew Research Center. (2018). News Use Across Social Media Platforms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  28. Pogrebinschi, T., & Tanscheit, T. (2017). Moving Backwards – What Happened to Citizen Participation. OpenDemocracy.Google Scholar
  29. Reuters Institute. (2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report. Reuters Institute.Google Scholar
  30. Rodota, S. (1997). Tecnopolitica (1st ed.). Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
  31. Shao, C., Ciampaglia, G. L., Varol, O., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2017). The Spread of Fake News by Social Bots. CoRR abs/1707.07592. [Manuscript].Google Scholar
  32. Susskind, J. (2018). Future Politics: Living Together in a World Transformed by Tech. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Viana, N. (2015). Foreword – O WikiLeaks e as batalhas digitais de Julian Assange [WikiLeaks and the Digital Battles of Julian Assange]. In Cypherpunks: Liberdade e o futuro da internet (pp. 9–18). Sao Paulo, Brazil: Boitempo Editorial.Google Scholar
  34. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 359, 1146–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Willians, G. (2004). Towards a Repoliticization of Participatory Development: Political Capabilities and Spaces of Empowerment. In Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? (pp. 92–107). London, UK: Zed Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Zaremberg, G. (2013). Political Citizenship and Gender, in: Shifting Frontiers of Citizenship: The Latin American Experience (pp. 1–24). BRILL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valesca Lima
    • 1
  1. 1.Maynooth UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations