Longitudinal Collision Risk Assessment of Closely Spaced Parallel Runways Paired Approach

  • Jingjie TengEmail author
  • Zhaoning Zhang
  • Wenya Li
  • Kexuan Liu
  • Yan Kang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 279)


Studying the paired approach of closely spaced parallel runways is of great significance for improving airport capacity and reducing flight delays, and has important theoretical and practical value. In order to study the longitudinal collision risk in the paired approach process, a kinematics equation is established to describe its motion process. Considering the influence of positional positioning error and aircraft wake motion, a longitudinal collision risk assessment model is established, and the calculation formula of relevant parameters in the model is given. Finally, the model is calculated by Matlab software, and the curve of collision risk with related parameters is given, and the rationality of the model is verified.


Paired approach Collision risk Wake motion Standard normal distribution 



The authors were supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71701202).


  1. 1.
    Mundra, A.: A paired approach procedure for closely spaced parallel runways: issues and simulation results. In: 18th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 4.C.4_1––4.C.4_1. IEEE (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Landry, S., Prichett, A.R.: The safe zone for paired closely spaced parallel approaches: implications for procedures and automation. In: The 19th Digital Avionics Systems Conference, DASC, Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 3E3/1–3E3/8. IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teo, R., Tomlin, C.J.: Provably safe evasive maneuvers against blunders in closely spaced parallel approaches. In: Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teo, R., Tomlin, C.J.: Computing danger zones for provably safe closely spaced parallel approaches. J. Guid. Control Dyn. 26(3), 434–442 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mc Kissick, B.T., Rico-Cusi, F.J., Murdoch, J.L., et al.: Wake encounter analysis for a closely spaced parallel runway paired approach simulation. In: 9th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference (ATIO), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, Z.N., Zhang, X., Li, D.-b.: Computation model of lateral collision rate on parallel routes based on VOR navigation. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 7(3), 21–24 (2007)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang, Z., Shen, J., Liu, J.: Lateral collision risk model based on CNS position error. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 9(6), 110–113 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, Z., Zuo, J.: Study on free flight collision risk based on brownian motion. China Saf. Sci. J. 22(8), 43–47 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, Z., Wang, Y.: Research on collision risk in free flight based on fuzzy stochastic differential equations. China Saf. Sci. J. 22(10), 14–18 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, Z., Liang, Y.: Bayesian network-based study on collision risk in free flight. China Saf. Sci. J. 24(9), 40–45 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, Z., Shi, R.: Study on free flight collision risk based on improved event model. China Saf. Sci. J. 25(7), 35–40 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Minghua, H.U., Yong, T.I.A.N., Kai, L.I.: Study of approach procedure to closely spaced parallel runways. J. Transp. Eng. Inf. 1(1), 64–69 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yong, T.I.A.N., Jia, S.U.N., Lili, W.A.N., et al.: Separation determining method of closely spaced parallel runways. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 13(1), 70–76 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu, F., Zhang, Z., Wei, Z., et al.: The longitudinal collision risk safety assessment of closed spaced parallel runways paired approach. China Saf. Sci. J. 23(8), 108–113 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhang, Z., Wang, L., Li, D.: Flight Separation in Safety Assessment, pp. 98–105. Science Press, Beijing (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jia, S., Yong, T.: Collision risk analysis of closed parallel runway pairing approach. Harbin Univ. Commer. J. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2, 241–245 (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Niu, X., Lyu, Z., Zhang, Z.: Minimum in-trail distance for paired closely spaced parallel. Aeronaut. Comput. Tech. 45(4), 46–48 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu, Z., Zhang, Z., Niu, X.: Collision risk safety assessment of paired approach based on velocity error and positioning error. Aeronaut. Comput. Tech. 45(6), 36–40 (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Civil Aviation Administration of China’s Decree No. 190. Rules for China Civil Aviation Air Traffic Management, pp. 11–22 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, Y.: Analysis of wake spacing reduction and collision safety. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Jiangsu, p. 26 (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jingjie Teng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Zhaoning Zhang
    • 1
  • Wenya Li
    • 1
  • Kexuan Liu
    • 1
  • Yan Kang
    • 2
  1. 1.Civil Aviation University of ChinaTianjinChina
  2. 2.China Cargo AirlinesShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations