Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Daniel Stoecklin
  • Riccardo Lucchini
Chapter
Part of the Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research book series (CHIR, volume 21)

Abstract

With the concept of Children in Streets Situations as a heuristic device to illuminate a particular object, we started to search for an object. We have reconstructed different objects: the child as an object of representations (Chap.  1), the social process linking the child to society making “street children” an abstract concept separate of the self (Chap.  2), the child’s own meaning making and reconstructions (Chap.  3), relationships (Chap.  4), survival strategies (Chap.  5), the street career (Chap.  6), peer-group sociability (Chap.  7), girls as potential sexual ‘objects’ and the multifunctionality of drug use (Chap.  8), agency and modes of action (Chap.  9), and children’s rights (Chap.  10). There is no single object that would subsume all others but rather a multiplicity of dimensions of a very complex phenomenon. The reduction of the situations experienced by children marginalised in the streets to a subtantialist approach of « street children » is another intolerable violence.

Keywords

Representations Meaning Relationships Survival strategies Career Sexual objects Drugs Agency Rights 

References

  1. Aptekar, L., & Stoecklin, D. (2014). Street children and homeless youth: A cross-cultural perspective. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Questions de sociologie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, F. (2009a). The efficiency of Chinese welfare policy for street children: A perspective of the street children. Journal of Social Sciences, 4, 11.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng, F. (2009b). Failure of the traditional childcare model and the causes of street children: An ethnographic study of the street children in the Shanghai Railway Station neighborhood. Society, 5, 8.Google Scholar
  7. Cusson, M. (1981). Délinquants, pourquoi? Paris: Colin.Google Scholar
  8. Elias, N. (1991). The symbol theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Fanon, F. (1961). The wretched of the earth. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (2012). Du gouvernement des vivants – Cours au Collège de France. 1979–1980 (Edition établie par M. Senellart, sous la direction de F. Ewald et A. Fontana). Paris: EHESS – Gallimard-Seuil.Google Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: The Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hanson, K., & Nieuwenhuys, O. (2013). Reconceptualizing children’s rights in international development. Living rights, social justice, translations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens. A brief history of humankind. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  15. Honneth, A. (1995). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Houchon, G. (1990). Pratiques et réseau: éloge de l’ambiguïté. Déviance et société, 14(2), 213–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jacquard, A. (1997). La légende de demain. Paris: Flammarion.Google Scholar
  18. Lucchini, R. (1993). Enfant de la rue. Identité, sociabilité, drogue. Genève/Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
  19. Marshall, T. (1963). Citizenship and social class. In T. Marshall (Ed.), Sociology at the crossroads and other essays. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  20. Mead, G. H. (1963). L’esprit, le soi et la société. Paris: PUF (translation from the 1934 original version in English).Google Scholar
  21. Quennerstedt, A. (2013). Children’s rights research moving into the future – Challenges on the way forward. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 21, 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rizzini, I. (1996). Street children. An excluded generation in Latin America. Childhood: A Journal of Global Child Research, 3(2), 215–233.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568296003002008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rizzini, I. (2010). Direitos humanos de crianças e adolescentes: 20 anos do Estatuto. Brasília: Secretaria de Direitos Humanos.Google Scholar
  24. Rizzini, I., & Bush, M. (2013). Affirming the young democracy: Youth engagement in Rio de Janeiro. In M. de los Ángeles Torres, I. Rizzini, & N. del Rio (Eds.), Citizens in the present. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  25. Rizzini, I., & Strickland, D. (2014). Growing up in contexts of vulnerability: The challenges in changing paradigms and practices for children’s and adolescent’s rights in Brazil and Mexico. In D. Stoecklin & J.-M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children’s rights and the capability approach. Challenges and prospects (Children’s well-being: Indicators and research 8) (pp. 253–272). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rizzini, I., Princeswal, M., Caldeira, P., & Bush, M. (2012). A efetivação de políticas públicas no Brasil. O caso das políticas para crianças e adolescentes em situação de rua. Rio de Janeiro: CIESPI-PUC-Rio.Google Scholar
  27. Samusocial International. (2014). La Suradaptation paradoxale. Une notion clé dans l’abord clinique et psychopathologique des enfants et jeunes de la rue. Cahier thématique. Paris: Agence française de développement.Google Scholar
  28. Stoecklin, D. (2014). Transformation of children’s lives through their rights. A new approach to agency. In L. Chisholm & V. Deliyanni-Kouimtzis (Eds.), Changing landscapes of childhood and youth in Europe (pp. 328–349). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Stoecklin, D. (2017). The general comment on children in street situations: Insights into the institutionalisation of children’s rights. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 25(4), 817–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stoecklin, D. (2018a). Freely expressed views: methodological challenges for the right of the child to be heard. Child Indicators Research: The official Journal of the International Society for Child Indicators, Springer. Article first published online: February 5, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9527-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stoecklin, D. (2018b). Institutionalisation of children’s rights: Transformability and situated agency. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 26(3), 548–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stoecklin, D., & Bonvin, J.-M. (2014a). The capability approach and children’s rights. In C. S. Hart, M. Biggeri, & B. Babic (Eds.), Agency and participation in childhood and youth. International applications of the capability approach in schools and beyond (pp. 63–82). London/New Delhi/New York/Sidney: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  33. Stoecklin, D., & Bonvin, J.-M. (2014b). Cross-fertilizing children’s rights and the capability approach. The example of the right to be heard in organized leisure. In D. Stoecklin & J.-M. Bonvin (Eds.), Children’s rights and the capability approach. Challenges and prospects (Children’s well-being: Indicators and research 8) (pp. 131–152). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stoecklin, D., & Fattore, T. (2018). Children’s multidimensional agency: Insights into the structuration of choice. Childhood: A Journal of Global Child Research, 25(1), 47–62. Article first published online: November 29, 2017; Issue published: February 1, 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568217743557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas, N., & Stoecklin, D. (2018). Recognition and capability: A new way to understand how children can achieve their rights? In C. Baraldi & T. Cockburn (Eds.), Theorising childhood. Citizenship, rights, and participation (Studies in childhood and youth) (pp. 73–94. Palgrave Macmillan. (ISBN 978-3-319-72672-4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72673-1).Google Scholar
  37. UNCRC. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child (UN, 1989). https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Accessed 27 Oct 2018
  38. UNCRC. (2017). General Comment No. 21 (2017) on Children in Street Situations. CRC/C/GC/21. https://www.crcasia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/G1717034.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2018.
  39. Weber, M. (1978). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Weber, M. (2013). La domination. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Stoecklin
    • 1
  • Riccardo Lucchini
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Children’s Right StudiesUniversity of GenevaBramois/SionSwitzerland
  2. 2.Professor EmeritusUniversity of Fribourg Professor EmeritusCorminboeufSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations