Clinical Outcomes of Outpatient Spine Surgery
Spine surgery has been successfully performed in the outpatient setting for the past 30 years. An overwhelming number of reports indicate performing select spine procedures, on appropriate patients, in the outpatient setting is as safe and effective as performing them in the hospital setting.
The rapid adaptation of minimally invasive techniques has significantly contributed to this paradigm shift and has been repeatedly shown to be associated with decreased bleeding, pain, and infection rates while maintaining equivalent outcomes when compared to traditional techniques.
Careful patient selection has been paramount to this transition, and those with significant cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities are typically unfit for outpatient spine surgery. Outpatient surgery candidacy can be further limited based on age, BMI, and opioid dependency.
In addition to being safe and effective, ambulatory spine surgery is also associated with improved patient and physician satisfaction. Furthermore, its cost benefits are robustly documented resulting in a progressively increasing number of spine surgery CPT codes being approved for the outpatient setting and an associated increase in reimbursement rates.
KeywordsAmbulatory surgery Minimally invasive Outpatient surgery Disc replacement Spine cost-effective
- 2.Ambulatory Surgery Center Association. ASCs: a positive trend in health care. http://www.ascassociation.org/advancingsurgicalcare/aboutascs/industryoverview/apositivetrendinhealthcare. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
- 10.Khanna R, Kim RB, Lam SK, Cybulski GR, Smith ZA, Dahdaleh NS. Comparing short-term complications of inpatient versus outpatient single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: an analysis of 6,940 patients using the ACS-NSQIP database. Clin Spine Surg. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.McClelland S, Passias P, Errico TJ, Protopsaltis TS. Inpatient versus outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a perioperative complication analysis of 259,414 patients from the healthcare cost and utilization project databases. Int J Spine Surg. 2017;11 https://doi.org/10.14444/4011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hospital for Special Surgery. High-volume hospitals improve orthopedic outcomes; 2011. https://www.hss.edu/newsroom_high-volume-hospitals-improve-Orthopedic-outcomes.asp. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
- 14.Hospital Compare. Ambulatory surgical center quality reporting program. https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/asc-ambulatory-surgical-measures.html. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
- 15.Hospital Compare. Ambulatory surgical center quality reporting program; 2015. https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/asc-ambulatory-surgical-measures.html. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.
- 22.Adamson T, Godil S, Mehrlich M, Mendenhall S, Asher A, McGirt M. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases. J Neurol Spine. 2016;24:878–84. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.8.SPINE14284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lorio M, Polly D, Ninkovic I, Ledonio C, Hallas K, Andersson G. Utilization of minimally invasive surgical approach for sacroiliac joint fusion in surgeon population of ISASS and SMISS membership. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:1–6. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 28.Becker’s ASC Review. Outpatient spine surgery anesthesia—Key thoughts from Dr. David Paly; 2015. http://www.beckersasc.com/uncategorized/outpatient-spine-surgery-anesthesia-key-thoughts-from-dr-david-paly.html. Accessed 23 Sept 2017.