Advertisement

Clinical and Economic Advantages of Out-Patient Spine Surgery

  • Neil M. Badlani
  • Joel Lehr
  • Frank M. Phillips
Chapter

Abstract

Outpatient spine surgery has grown dramatically over the last decade because of significant clinical and economic advantages to patients, physicians, and the healthcare industry. Improving technology, increased patient and physician satisfaction, as well as a desire to control healthcare costs are key drivers of this growth. Patients prefer outpatient procedures because of the increased convenience and quality of care. Physicians benefit from the efficiencies of the outpatient setting and potential profit from ownership. The healthcare market continues to evolve because of ambulatory surgery centers providing a disruptive innovation to the existing industry structure. Shifting site of surgery to the outpatient setting leads to an overall decentralization of heathcare and significant cost saving opportunities. The trend toward moving spine surgery to the outpatient setting will continue as patients and physicians become more comfortable with the process and evidence continues to show excellent outcomes, low complications, and economic efficiencies.

Keywords

Outpatient Economic Advantages Spine surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Orszag PR, Ellis P. The challenge of rising health care costs—a view from the Congressional Budget Office. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1793–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Orszag PR, Ellis P. Addressing rising health care costs—a view from the Congressional Budget Office. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(19):1885–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Martin BI, et al. Trends in health care expenditures, utilization, and health status among US adults with spine problems, 1997–2006. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(19):2077–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bodenheimer T. High and rising health care costs. Part 1: seeking an explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142(10):847–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thorpe KE, Florence CS, Joski P. Which medical conditions account for the rise in health care spending? Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:W4–437–45.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Squires D, Anderson C. U.S. health care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015;15:1–15.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leader S, Moon M. Medicare trends in ambulatory surgery. Health Aff (Millwood). 1989;8(1):158–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    America Hospital Association. Trendwatch chartbook: trends affecting hospital and health systems; 2015.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ambulatory Surgery Center Association. ASCs: a positive trend in health care; 2012.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Healio. With the growth of outpatient orthopedic spine surgery, more research is warranted. In Orthopedics Today; 2015. Healio.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Blue Cross Blue Shield. How consumers are saving with the shift to outpatient care; 2016.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    An HS, Simpson JM, Stein R. Outpatient laminotomy and discectomy. J Spinal Disord. 1999;12(3):192–6.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baird EO, et al. National trends in outpatient surgical treatment of degenerative cervical spine disease. Global Spine J. 2014;4(3):143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zahrawi F. Microlumbar discectomy. Is it safe as an outpatient procedure? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19(9):1070–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stieber JR, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with plate fixation as an outpatient procedure. Spine J. 2005;5(5):503–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Erickson M, et al. Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007;36(8):429–32.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silvers HR, et al. Day surgery for cervical microdiscectomy: is it safe and effective? J Spinal Disord. 1996;9(4):287–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chin KR, Coombs AV, Seale JA. Feasibility and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient single-level instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a surgery center: preliminary results in 16 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(1):E36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Emami A, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the outpatient setting. Orthopedics. 2016;39(6):e1218–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chin KR, et al. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in ambulatory surgery centers: patient selection and outcome measures compared with an inhospital cohort. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(8):686–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frack B, Grabenstatter K, Williamson J. Ambulatory surgery centers: becoming big business: L.E.K. Consulting/Executive Insights; 2017.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Network, S.C. Hospital or ASC . . . What’s the difference? 2016.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Press-Ganey Associates. Outpatient pulse report; 2008.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pugely AJ, et al. Outpatient surgery reduces short-term complications in lumbar discectomy: an analysis of 4310 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):264–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Best NM, Sasso RC. Success and safety in outpatient microlumbar discectomy. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(5):334–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ban D, et al. Safety of outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Med Res. 2016;21(1):34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McClelland S, et al. Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;34:166–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adamson T, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient ambulatory surgery setting compared with the inpatient hospital setting: analysis of 1000 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(6):878–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fu MC, et al. Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with fewer short-term complications inOne-and two-level cases: a propensity-adjusted analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;42(14):1044–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McGirt MJ, et al. Quality analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in the outpatient versus inpatient setting: analysis of 7288 patients from the NSQIP database. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(6):E9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Silva PS, et al. Learning curve and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2013;35(2):E7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee KH, et al. Learning curve of a complex surgical technique: minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014;27(7):E234–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schneider JE, et al. The economics of specialty hospitals. Med Care Res Rev. 2008;65(5):531–53; discussion 554–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith A. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Dublin: Whitestone; 1776.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eastaugh SR. Hospital costs and specialization: benefits of trimming product lines. J Health Care Finance. 2001;28(1):61–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baird EO, et al. Ambulatory spine surgery: a survey study. Global Spine J. 2014;4(3):157–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ambulatory Surgery Center Association. The ASC cost differential; 2016.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ambulatory Surgery Center Association Healthcare Bluebook. Commercial insurance cost savings in ambulatory surgery centers; 2016.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bekelis K, et al. Selection of patients for ambulatory lumbar discectomy: results from four US states. Spine J. 2014;14(9):1944–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Christensen C. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hansen E, Bozic KJ. The impact of disruptive innovations in orthopaedics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(10):2512–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Christensen CM, Bohmer R, Kenagy J. Will disruptive innovations cure health care? Harv Bus Rev. 2000;78(5):102–12, 199.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil M. Badlani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joel Lehr
    • 3
  • Frank M. Phillips
    • 4
  1. 1.The Orthopedic Sports ClinicHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Nobilis Health CorporationHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Nobilis Health Corporation, Investor RelationsHoustonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryRush University Medical CenterChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations